Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2019; 25(43): 6430-6439
Published online Nov 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i43.6430
Table 1 Patient demographics and clinical data of retrospectively screened cohort
CharacteristicValue
Age155 (19, 54, 84)
Female28 (20.7)
Male107 (79.3)
Etiology of cirrhosis
Alcoholic114 (84.4)
NASH7 (5.2)
BCS4 (3.0)
Kryptogenic3 (2.2)
HCV2 (1.5)
PBC1 (0.7)
Autoimmune1 (0.7)
Hemochromatosis1 (0.7)
HBV1 (0.7)
Toxic1 (0.7)
Indications for TIPS
RA83 (61.5)
RVB38 (28.4)
HRS10 (7.5)
BCS3 (2.2)
Others1 (0.7)
Technique
MHV-RPV107 (79.3)
RHV-RPV15 (11.1)
LHV-LPV2 (1.5)
MHV-LPV1 (0.7)
Unknown10 (7.4)
Time with TIPS27 (0, 19, 148)
Revision
No revision105 (77.8)
1 revision28 (20.7)
More than 1 revision2 (1.5)
Indications for revision
Encephalopathy8 (26.7)
Low shunt flow8 (26.7)
Thrombosis14 (46.7)
End of follow-up
Loss to follow-up99 (73.3)
Death with TIPS20 (14.8)
Consecutive LTx17 (12.6)
Table 2 Characteristics of patients presenting with segmental intrahepatic cholestasis after intervention
PatientAge1SexAetiolog-y of cirrhosisIndicati-on for TIPSTIPS-typeTIPS Localisa-tionCongest-ed segment-sSIC-T free intervall with TIPS2Time from last imaging without SIC-T suspi-cion2MELD before SIC-T diagno-sisMELD at SIC-T diagno-sisRelevant complica-tions
151MAlcoholicRA & HRSPTFE-coveredRHV-RPVVII72391112None
255MAlcoholicRAPTFE-coveredRHV-RPVVII83261916None
349FalcoholicRA & HRSPTFE-coveredMHV-RPVV17< 11822SBP
444MBCSRAPTFE-coveredAtypicalI0,4< 1109Hepatic abscess
Table 3 Univariate regression analysis for prediction of segmental intrahepatic cholestasis
VariableORUnivariate 95%CIP value
Age0.96-0.1 - 0.10.40
Male gender0.78-2.6 - 2.10.83
Other than alcoholic cirrhosis0.54-2.9 - 1.70.60
RVB as TIPS indication< 0.01-5654.8 - 5620.00.99
TIPS placement other than MHV-RPV21.00.7 - 5.40.01