Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2019; 25(40): 6053-6062
Published online Oct 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053
Published online Oct 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053
Table 1 Quantitative ultrasound: Optimal cutoffs obtained using proton density fat fraction with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard
Technique | S0 vs S1–S3 | S0–S1 vs S2–S3 | S0–S2 vs S3 |
BSC[20], 1/cm-sr (NAFLD) | 0.0038 | --------- | --------- |
Sensitivity: 93% | --------- | --------- | |
Specificity: 97% | --------- | --------- | |
CAP[30], dB/m (NAFLD) | 288 | --------- | --------- |
Sensitivity: 75% | |||
Specificity: 77% | |||
ATI[40], dB/cm/MHz (NAFLD) | 0.63 | 0.72 | --------- |
Sensitivity: 80% | Sensitivity: 100% | --------- | |
Specificity: 89% | Specificity: 78% | --------- | |
UGAP[43], dB/cm/MHz (NAFLD) | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.74 |
Sensitivity: 80% | Sensitivity: 83% | Sensitivity: 87% | |
Specificity: 91% | Specificity: 74% | Specificity: 79% | |
SSE[46], mm/μs (not specified) | 1.537 | 1.511 | --------- |
Sensitivity: 80% | Sensitivity: 100% | --------- | |
Specificity: 86% | Specificity: 96% | --------- |
Table 2 Quantitative ultrasound: Optimal cutoffs obtained using liver biopsy as the reference standard
Technique | S0 vs S1–S3 | S0–S1 vs S2–S3 | S0–S2 vs S3 |
CAP[24,25], dB/m (viral hepatitis) | 219-222 | 233-296 | 290 |
Sensitivity: 76-91% | Sensitivity: 60-87% | Sensitivity: 78% | |
Specificity: 52-71% | Specificity: 74-91% | Specificity: 93% | |
CAP[26-28], dB/m (mixed etiologies) | 255-266 | 283-311 | 293-318 |
Sensitivity: 65-75% | Sensitivity: 57-86% | Sensitivity: 83-88% | |
Specificity: 82-87% | Specificity: 85-94% | Specificity: 81-91% | |
CAP[29], dB/m1 (mixed etiologies) | 248 | 268 | 280 |
Sensitivity: 69% | Sensitivity: 77% | Sensitivity: 88% | |
Specificity: 82% | Specificity: 81% | Specificity: 78% | |
CAP[32], dB/m (NAFLD) | 302 | 331 | 337 |
Sensitivity: 80% | Sensitivity: 70% | Sensitivity: 72% | |
Specificity: 83% | Specificity: 76% | Specificity: 63% | |
ATI[41], dB/cm/MHz (mixed etiologies) | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.74 |
Sensitivity: 74% | Sensitivity: 86% | Sensitivity: 100% | |
Specificity: 77% | Specificity: 81% | Specificity: 82% | |
UGAP[42], dB/cm/MHz (mixed etiologies) | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.65 |
Sensitivity: 81% | Sensitivity: 86% | Sensitivity: 84% | |
Specificity: 87% | Specificity: 81% | Specificity: 90% | |
ATT[44], dB/cm/MHz (mixed etiologies) | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
Sensitivity: 72% | Sensitivity: 87% | Sensitivity: 82% | |
Specificity: 82% | Specificity: 72% | Specificity: 89% |
- Citation: Ferraioli G, Soares Monteiro LB. Ultrasound-based techniques for the diagnosis of liver steatosis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(40): 6053-6062
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i40/6053.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i40.6053