Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2019; 25(37): 5604-5618
Published online Oct 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5604
Table 1 Diagnostic value of plasma miR-21 and miR-93 for clinicopathological features of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients
Pathological featureAUC95%CISECut-offSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
MiR-21
T stage0.8190.740-0.8990.0416.5280.0071.43
N stage0.7580.666-0.8510.0475.9067.0279.41
M stage0.8240.740-0.9080.0436.3485.7170.00
Pathological differentiation0.7250.637-0.8120.0446.2080.8559.26
MiR-93
T stage0.8270.742-0.9110.0434.3773.3380.61
N stage0.8150.733-0.8960.0413.3474.4776.47
M stage0.8140.722-0.9060.0475.3657.1497.00
Table 2 Correlation of plasma miR-21 and miR-93 with clinicopathological features of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (mean ± SD)
CategorynmiR-21t/FP valuemiR-93t/FP-value
Gender0.8670.3870.3370.737
Male956.06 ± 1.613.63 ± 1.75
Female335.77 ± 1.783.74 ± 1.14
Age (yr)0.5900.5560.7040.483
≤ 65545.89 ± 1.613.57 ± 1.67
> 65746.06±1.613.76 ± 1.38
Smoking history1.1080.2701.0130.313
Yes525.80 ± 1.473.53 ± 1.70
No766.12 ± 1.693.80 ± 1.31
History of alcoholism1.6940.0931.2860.201
Yes605.73 ± 1.543.49 ± 1.46
No686.21 ± 1.653.83 ± 1.52
T stage6.078< 0.001b6.489< 0.001d
T2/T3985.57 ± 1.473.27 ± 1.31
T4307.37 ± 1.245.03 ± 1.27
N stage4.503< 0.001b6.363< 0.001d
N0345.00 ± 1.282.46 ± 1.21
N1946.35 ± 1.574.12 ± 1.34
M stage6.111< 0.001b6.315< 0.001d
M01005.58 ± 1.453.30 ± 1.30
M1287.44 ± 1.285.06 ± 1.34
Tumor site0.2190.8040.4040.669
Upper 1/3 of thoracic part446.10 ± 1.463.52 ± 1.45
Middle 1/3 of thoracic part595.89 ± 1.693.78 ± 1.37
Lower 1/3 of thoracic part256.02 ± 1.703.75 ± 1.88
Pathological differentiation4.379< 0.001b1.3710.172
Medium/high differentiation475.16 ± 1.383.09 ± 1.42
Low differentiation816.43 ± 1.613.92 ± 1.50
Tumor length (cm)0.6840.4951.2190.225
≤ 5305.81 ± 1.553.39 ± 1.54
> 5986.04 ± 1.633.77 ± 1.48
Table 3 Predictive value of plasma miR-21 and miR-93 for radiotherapy and chemotherapy efficacy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients
IndexAUC95%CISECut-offSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
MiR-210.8110.738-0.8840.0375.8097.3059.34
MiR-930.8100.726-0.8940.0434.7159.4691.21
MiR-21 + MiR-930.8940.838-0.9500.0280.4175.6889.01
Table 4 Correlation of clinical parameters and indexes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with radiotherapy and chemotherapy efficacy, n (%)
CategorynEffective (n = 91)Ineffective (n = 37)χ2P-value
Gender0.0580.810
Male9567 (73.63)28 (75.68)
Female3324 (26.37)9 (24.32)
Age (Yr)0.4040.525
≤ 655440 (43.96)14 (37.84)
> 657451 (56.04)23 (62.16)
Smoking history5.7330.017a
No5243 (47.25)9 (24.32)
Yes7648 (52.75)28 (75.68)
History of alcoholism0.8390.360
No6045 (49.45)15 (40.54)
Yes6846 (50.55)22 (59.46)
T stage11.380< 0.001b
T2/T39877 (84.62)21 (56.76)
T43014 (15.38)16 (43.24)
N stage4.5430.033a
N03429 (31.87)5 (13.51)
N19462 (68.13)32 (86.49)
M stage13.900< 0.001b
M010079 (86.81)21 (56.76)
M12812 (13.19)16 (43.24)
Tumor site0.2830.868
Upper 1/3 of thoracic part4430 (32.97)14 (37.84)
Middle 1/3 of thoracic part5943 (47.25)16 (43.24)
Lower 1/3 of thoracic part2518 (19.78)7 (18.92)
Pathological differentiation5.1050.024a
Moderate/high differentiation4739 (42.86)8 (21.62)
Low differentiation8152 (57.14)29 (78.38)
Tumor length (cm)0.5920.442
≤ 53023 (25.27)7 (18.92)
> 59868 (74.73)30 (81.08)
MiR-2114.870< 0.001b
≤ 5.807261 (67.03)11 (29.73)
> 5.805630 (32.97)26 (70.27)
MiR-9312.590< 0.001b
≤ 4.719978 (85.71)21 (56.76)
> 4.712913 (14.29)16 (43.24)
Table 5 Assignment in logistic multivariate regression analysis
FactorVariableAssignmentFactor
Smoking historyX1No = 1, Yes = 2Smoking history
T stageX2T2/T3 = 1, T4 = 2T stage
N stageX3N0 = 1, N1 = 2N stage
M stageX4M0 = 1, M1 = 2M stage
Pathological differentiationX5Moderate/high differentiation = 1, low differentiation = 2Pathological differentiation
MiR-21X6≤ 5.80 = 1, > 5.80 = 2MiR-21
MiR-93X7≤ 4.71 = 1, > 4.71 = 2MiR-93
Table 6 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors affecting radiotherapy and chemotherapy efficacy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients
VariableBSEWaldP-valueOR95%CI
Smoking history0.1030.4780.0460.8301.1080.434-2.829
T stage1.0930.5064.6760.031a2.9841.108-8.037
N stage0.9540.7131.7920.1812.5970.642-10.502
M stage1.0470.4545.3120.021a2.8481.170-6.935
Pathological differentiation0.6440.6001.1550.2831.9050.588-6.168
MiR-211.9010.6029.9610.002b6.6922.055-21.79
MiR-931.0260.4565.0640.024a2.7911.142-6.823
Table 7 Predictive value of plasma miR-21 and miR-93 for the 3-year overall survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients
IndexAUC95%CISECut-offSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
MiR-210.8610.797-0.9260.0335.6082.5079.17
MiR-930.8070.733-0.8800.0373.8762.5092.50
Table 8 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of factors affecting 3-year overall survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients
IndexUnivariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)P-valueHR (95%CI)P-value
Gender (male vs female)1.178 (0.508-2.686)0.713
Age (≤ 65 yr vs > 65 yr)1.167 (0.439-3.158)0.770
Smoking history (no vs yes)0.631 (0.259-1.483)0.288
History of alcoholism (no vs yes)0.802 (0.447-1.459)0.468
T stage (T2/T3 vs T4)3.183 (1.762-5.783)< 0.001b3.168 (1.537-6.537)0.003b
N stage (N0 vs N1)1.318 (1.067-1.638)0.015a1.307 (1.057-1.736)0.017a
M stage (M0 vs M1)2.438 (1.934-3.062)< 0.001b1.735 (1.402-2.281)<0.001b
Tumor site (Upper 1/3 vs middle 1/3 vs lower 1/3 of thoracic part)1.289 (0.557-2.825)0.548
Pathological differentiation (moderate/high differentiation vs low differentiation)0.753 (0.567-1.008)0.048a0.802 (0.557-1.159)0.243
Tumor length (≤ 5 cm vs > 5 cm)0.687 (0.283-1.675)0.394
Radiotherapy and chemotherapy (effective vs ineffective)1.695 (1.237-2.248)0.001b1.335 (0.975-1.846)0.080
MiR-21 (≤ 5.60 vs > 5.60)4.083 (2.158-7.763)< 0.001b2.438 (1.276-4.71)0.007b
MiR-93 (≤ 3.87 vs > 3.87)4.485 (1.993-10.067)< 0.001b2.198 (1.256-3.875)0.009b