Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2019; 25(1): 107-117
Published online Jan 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i1.107
Published online Jan 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i1.107
Table 1 The severity scoring system of acute pancreatitis of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2008)[15]
Prognostic factors (1 point for each factor) | |
Base excess ≤ 3 mEq/L or shock (systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg) | |
PaO2 ≤ 60 mmHg (room air) or respiratory failure (respirator management is needed) | |
BUN ≥ 40 mg/dL (or Cr ≥ 2.0 mg/dL) or oliguria (daily urine output <400 mL even after fluid replacement) | |
LDH ≥ 2 times of upper limit of normal | |
Platelet count ≤ 100000/mm3 | |
Serum Ca ≤ 7.5 mg/dL | |
CRP ≥ 15 mg/dL | |
Number of positive measures in SIRS criteria ≥3 | |
Age ≥ 70 yr | |
CT Grade by CECT | |
Extra-pancreatic progression of inflammation | |
Anterior pararenal space | 0 point |
Root of mesocolon | 1 point |
Beyond lower pole of kidney | 2 points |
Hypo-enhanced lesion of the pancreas | |
The pancreas is conveniently divided into three segments (head, body, and tail). | |
Localized in each segment or only surrounding the pancreas | 0 point |
Covers 2 segments | 1 point |
Occupies entire 2 segments or more | 2 points |
1 + 2 = total scores | |
Total score = 0 or 1 | Grade 1 |
Total score = 2 | Grade 2 |
Total score = 3 or more | Grade 3 |
Assessment of severity | |
(1) If prognostic factors are scored as 3 points or more, or (2) If CT Grade grade is judged as Grade grade 2 or more, the severity grading is evaluated to be as ‘‘severe’’. | |
Measures in SIRS diagnostic criteria: (1) Temperature > 38 °C or < 36 °C; (2) Heart rate > 90 beats/min; (3) Respiratory rate > 20 breaths/min or PaCO2 < 32 torr; and (4) WBC > 12000 cells/mm3, < 4000 cells/mm3, or > 10% immature (band) forms. |
Table 2 The characteristics of patients at enrollment
Acute pancreatitis (n = 78) | Other disease (n = 16) | |
Age, median (IQR), yr | 57 (28) | 61 (26) |
Sex, n: male/female | 50/26 | 9/7 |
Etiology of acute pancreatitis, n (%) | ||
Alcohol | 26 (33.3) | |
Gallstones | 13 (16.7) | |
Idiopathic | 12 (15.4) | |
Post-ERCP | 5 (6.4) | |
Others | 22 (28.2) | |
Prognostic factor score by JMHLW (2008) criteria (n = 78) | ||
Mean (SD) | 0.9 (1.2) | |
Severe acute pancreatitis (≥ 3), n (%) | 9 (11.5) | |
Score of CT Grade by JMHLW (2008) criteria (n = 70) | ||
Mean (SD) | 1.0 (1.2) | |
Severe acute pancreatitis (Score ≥ 2), n (%) | 28 (40) |
Table 3 Urinary marker levels at enrollment in patients with severe and mild pancreatitis by prognostic factors according to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare criteria (2008)[15]
Severity by prognostic factors | |||||
Severe | Mild | ||||
No. cases | 9 | 69 | |||
Prognostic factors: mean (SD) | 2.89 | (1.83) | 0.57 | (0.69) | |
Age: median (LQ, UQ), yr | 48.5 | (45, 69.75) | 58 | (44, 72) | |
Sex: male/female | 5/2 | 45/24 | |||
Median (LQ, UQ) | AUC | ||||
Urinary trypsinogen-2, mg/dL | 6.49 | (2.41, 208.76) | 2.87 | (0.22, 19.98) | 0.704 |
Urinary trypsinogen-2/cre | 11.2 | (2.43, 214.05) | 6.36 | (0.31, 33.02) | 0.592 |
Urinary TAP, ng/mL | 2.68 | (2.07, 5.22) | 2.79 | (1.25, 5.53) | 0.458 |
Urinary TAP/cre, × 0.0001 | 6.7 | (2.40, 11.50) | 4.1 | (2.25, 7.20) | 0.631 |
Urinary amylase, × 1000 U/L | 1.42 | (0.50, 3.16) | 1.01 | (0.40, 2.68) | 0.563 |
Urinary amylase/cre, U/mg | 3.65 | (0.38, 8.47) | 2.22 | (0.81, 4.00) | 0.58 |
Urinary creatinine, × 10 mg/dL | 3.63 | (3.16, 8.65) | 6.09 | (3.89, 10.24) | 0.599 |
Serum amylase, × 100 U/L | 11.37 | (2.44, 23.37) | 6.38 | (3.46, 11.72) | 0.581 |
Serum lipase, × 100 U/L | 5.85 | (4.41, 13.57) | 6.95 | (2.46, 16.71) | 0.508 |
Serum creatinine, × 0.1mg/dL | 9.7 | (5.95, 19.65) | 6.75 | (5.83, 8.55) | 0.676 |
Table 4 Urinary marker levels at enrollment between patients with severe and mild pancreatitis by computed tomography Grade according to the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare criteria (2008)[15]
Severity by CT Grade | |||||
Severe | Mild | ||||
No. cases | 28 | 42 | |||
Score of CT Grade: mean (SD) | 2.37 (0.69) | 0.17 (0.38) | |||
Extra-pancreatic progression of inflammation (Score 0/1/2) | 0/1/27 | 35/7/0 | |||
Hypo-enhanced lesion of the pancreas (Score 0/1/2) | 19/3/4 | 42/0/0 | |||
Age: median (LQ, UQ), yr | 53 (44, 67) | 61 (47.5, 73.25) | |||
Sex: male/female, n | 20/6 | 24/18 | |||
Median (LQ, UQ) | AUC | ||||
Urinary trypsinogen-2, mg/dL | 14.68 | (2.10, 66.90) | 2.69 | (0.20, 17.11) | 0.701 |
Urinary trypsinogen-2/cre | 14.40 | (4.29, 104.03) | 6.36 | (0.32, 17.94) | 0.678 |
Urinary TAP, ng/mL | 3.98 | (2.20, 7.81) | 2.07 | (0.96, 3.87) | 0.692 |
Urinary TAP/cre, × 0.0001 | 6.70 | (4.15, 10.90) | 3.10 | (2.20, 6.00) | 0.727 |
Urinary amylase, × 1000 U/L | 1.94 | (0.64, 3.62) | 0.97 | (0.47, 2.29) | 0.615 |
Urinary amylase/cre, U/mg | 3.54 | (0.63, 5.88) | 2.23 | (0.88, 3.65) | 0.588 |
Urinary creatinine, × 10 mg/dL | 6.55 | (3.54, 9.24) | 5.54 | (3.49, 10.47) | 0.472 |
Serum amylase, × 100 U/L | 9.28 | (2.88, 15.22) | 6.28 | (3.91, 11.74) | 0.588 |
Serum lipase, × 100 U/L | 8.10 | (1.82, 18.49) | 6.95 | (4.32, 15.73) | 0.521 |
Serum creatinine, × 0.1 mg/dL | 7.25 | (5.40, 8.90) | 6.90 | (5.75, 7.95) | 0.574 |
Table 5 Urinary marker levels at enrollment according to the score of computed tomography Grade by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare criteria (2008)[15]
Extra-pancreatic progression of inflammation | |||||
Score of CT Grade | 0 | 1 | 2 | P value | |
n | 32 | 8 | 24 | ||
Urinary trypsinogen-2 (mg/dL) | Median | 1.26 | 27.65 | 16.98 | 0.001a |
(LQ, UQ) | (0.15, 11.20) | (2.67, 91.61) | (3.04, 71.25) | ||
Urinary trypsinogen-2/cre | Median | 3.11 | 28.5 | 15.77 | 0.046a |
(LQ, UQ) | (0.31, 13.17) | (6.70, 130.83) | (3.76, 106.64) | ||
Urinary TAP (ng/mL) | Median | 1.97 | 2.7 | 4.19 | 0.001a |
(LQ, UQ) | (0.95, 3.79) | (1.15, 4.73) | (2.55, 8.06) | ||
Urinary TAP/cre (× 0.0001) | Median | 2.75 | 3.65 | 6.95 | 0.003a |
(LQ, UQ) | (2.03, 6.53) | (3.10, 4.73) | (4.63, 11.20) | ||
Urinary amylase (× 1000 U/L) | Median | 0.94 | 1.44 | 2.11 | 0.06 |
(LQ, UQ) | (4.63, 17.14) | (3.13, 41.84) | (8.25, 36.65) | ||
Urinary amylase/cre (U/mg) | Median | 2.22 | 2.02 | 3.72 | 0.22 |
(LQ, UQ) | (0.85, 3.54) | (0.56, 4.36) | (0.91, 6.15) | ||
Urinary creatinine (× 10 mg/dL) | Median | 4.68 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 0.94 |
(LQ, UQ) | (3.48, 10.20) | (3.24, 10.14) | (3.95, 9.57) | ||
Serum creatinine (× 0.1 mg/dL) | Median | 6.75 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 0.042a |
(LQ, UQ) | (5.88, 8.33) | (4.95, 7.20) | (5.20, 9.00) | ||
Hypo-enhanced lesion of the pancreas | |||||
Score of CT Grade | 0 | 1 | 2 | P value | |
n | 55 | 3 | 4 | ||
Urinary trypsinogen-2 (mg/dL) | Median | 4.51 | 44.33 | 6.77 | 0.63 |
(LQ, UQ) | (0.47, 30.35) | (1.78, 100.99) | (2.45, 14.81) | ||
Urinary trypsinogen-2/cre | Median | 8.37 | 148.96 | 9.07 | 0.84 |
(LQ, UQ) | (0.53, 40.84) | (2.27, 179.09) | (6.54, 15.45) | ||
Urinary TAP (ng/mL) | Median | 2.61 | 3.07 | 5.88 | 0.45 |
(LQ, UQ) | (1.33, 5.63) | (2.79, 5.22) | (1.04, 12.48) | ||
Urinary TAP/cre (× 0.0001) | Median | 4.1 | 6.7 | 6.85 | 0.65 |
(LQ, UQ) | (2.30, 7.20) | (4.90, 10.30) | (3.25, 11.80) | ||
Urinary amylase (× 1000 U/L) | Median | 1.24 | 1.01 | 2.22 | 0.83 |
(LQ, UQ) | (4.95, 28.55) | (7.87, 22.70) | (2.94, 35.16) | ||
Urinary amylase/cre (U/mg) | Median | 2.59 | 3.39 | 2.21 | 0.72 |
(LQ, UQ) | (0.88, 4.56) | (1.00, 4.03) | (0.46, 6.13) | ||
Urinary creatinine (× 10 mg/dL) | Median | 6.37 | 5.64 | 7.47 | 0.56 |
(LQ, UQ) | (3.70, 10.45) | (2.98, 7.85) | (3.11, 10.53) | ||
Serum creatinine (× 0.1 mg/dL) | Median | 6.95 | 7.8 | 6.25 | 0.3 |
(LQ, UQ) | (5.83, 8.60) | (4.90, 8.60) | (4.70, 7.88) |
- Citation: Yasuda H, Kataoka K, Takeyama Y, Takeda K, Ito T, Mayumi T, Isaji S, Mine T, Kitagawa M, Kiriyama S, Sakagami J, Masamune A, Inui K, Hirano K, Akashi R, Yokoe M, Sogame Y, Okazaki K, Morioka C, Kihara Y, Kawa S, Tanaka M, Andoh A, Kimura W, Nishimori I, Furuse J, Yokota I, Shimosegawa T. Usefulness of urinary trypsinogen-2 and trypsinogen activation peptide in acute pancreatitis: A multicenter study in Japan. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(1): 107-117
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i1/107.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i1.107