Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2018; 24(38): 4311-4329
Published online Oct 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i38.4311
Table 1 Main studies reporting the characteristics and mortality rates associated with infections in patients with liver cirrhosis
YearPrevalence of infections (%); patient nMain infection sites (%)Most common pathogens (%)Mortality rates (%)Ref.
2018NR; n = 312Only BSI included; primary (32), SBP (16), UTI (11)GNB (53)25[28]
201761; n = 852Only BSI included; primary (60), abdominal (33), UTI (7), pneumonia (6)GNB (60)23[22]
201538; n = 401Pneumonia (22), UTI (21), SBP (19)E. coli (72)31[23]
201251; n = 207UTI (52), SBP (23), BSI (21)GPB (56)24[19]
201033; n = 150UTI (37), pneumonia (22), BSI (13)GNB (62)37[18]
200745; n = 233UTI (43), pneumonia (25), SBP (16)GNB (65)18[20]
200325; n = 135UTI (31), SBP (26), pneumonia (25)NR9[25]
200222; n = 70BSI (16), CVC-BSI (9), liver abscess (3)GPB (67)29[24]
200232; n = 507SBP (24), UTI (19), pneumonia (14), CVC-BSI (8)GPB (47)22[17]
200134; n = 361UTI (41), SBP (23), BSI (21), pneumonia (17)E. coli (25)15[8]
199439; n = 132SBP (44), UTI (26), pneumonia (16)GNB (65), E. coli (62)29[27]
199347; n = 170SBP (31), UTI (25), pneumonia (21)GNB (72)17[26]
Table 2 Management of fungal infections in patients with liver cirrhosis
TypeCharacteristicsManagementRef.
SFP, fungemia, disseminated fungal infection (mainly Candida spp.)Delayed diagnosis and therapy. Lack of clinical signs and suspicion. Frequent concomitant SBP. High mortality.Suspect if peritonitis is not improved after 48 h of empirical antibiotic treatment. Perform fungal cultures (ascites and blood).[44,45,52,53]
Antifungal prophylaxisFactors influencing mortality less known. Mortality higher than SBP due to delayed diagnosis.Indicated for SBP (high risk, previous episode, GI bleeding). No clear indication for fungal infections. Consider in: ICU patients without improvement > 48 h, high prevalence (> 5%) regions, risk factors (corticosteroids, prolonged microbial use, CVC, TPN, high APACHE score, dialysis).[48,54]
Antifungal treatmentRecommendations for fungal infections in LC.Prompt initiation. Echinocandins as first-line treatment (e.g., fungemia, nosocomial SFP or critically ill with CA-SFP). Fluconazole indicated if less severe infections. De-escalation if patient is stable and sensitivity tests available.[52-54]
Table 3 Management of infections in liver transplant recipients
Population/ infectionRisk factor and type of infectionManagementRef.
Liver transplant candidates/all infectionsDonor-derived. Active/latent infections. Vaccine-preventable infection.Donor screening. Careful patient history and physical examination. Identification of infections requiring therapy. Immunization.[160-165]
Liver transplant recipients/bacterialNosocomial infections (ICU, invasive devices). Recurrent infections (anatomical defects). Immunosuppression.Peri-transplant antibiotic prophylaxis (< 48 h). Prompt diagnostic workup (uncommon presentations, opportunisms). Source control when needed.[76,83,160]
Liver transplant candidates and recipients/MDROColonization (MRSA, VRE, CRE) linked to increased risk of infections. Risk of transmission between patients and across wards.Surveillance cultures (CRE, VRE, MRSA) and decolonization (MRSA). Infection control (hand hygiene, isolation, contact precautions).[102,112,164]
Table 4 Treatment options for multidrug resistant organisms in liver transplant recipients
PathogensRecommendationAntimicrobial regimensRef.
MDR Gram-positives
MRSANasal decolonization with mupirocin. Daptomycin highly bactericidal in BSI; non effective in pulmonary infections. Linezolid and tigecycline bacteriostatic.Vancomycin1/linezolid OR Daptomycin OR Tigecycline OR Novel anti-MRSA cephalosporins (ceftaroline, ceftobiprole)2.[107-111]
VREDaptomycin highly bactericidal in BSI; non effective in pulmonary infections. Linezolid and tigecycline bacteriostatic.Linezolid OR Daptomycin OR Tigecycline.[113,121,122]
MDR Gram-negatives
ESBL-producing EnterobacteriaceaeConflicting data on carbapenem superiority vs BLBLI. Meropenem recommended for high inoculum infections and unstable patients.Carbapenems OR Piperacillin/tazobactam.[175-177]
Carbapenem-resistant EnterobacteriaceaeTest antimicrobial susceptibility (also on colonizing strains). Some evidence of better outcomes with combination therapy vs monotherapy. New molecules promising but scarce data in LT.Ceftazidime/avibactam, OR Combination regimen (at least two active drugs) including colistin/polymixin B, tigecycline, aminoglycosides1 (gentamycin, amikacin), IV fosfomycin, high-dose prolonged infusion carbapenems. For uncomplicated UTI, consider monotherapy (aminoglycosides, fosfomycin).[127,137,138,175,178]
MDR P. aeruginosaTest antimicrobial susceptibility. New molecules promising but scarce data in LT.Combination regimen (at least two active drugs) including colistin, an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam (if susceptible), aminoglycosides1, fosfomycin OR Ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam[175,179,180]