Pan S, Wang XQ, Guo QY. Quantitative assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B and C: T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(18): 2024-2035 [PMID: 29760545 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i18.2024]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Qi-Yong Guo, MD, Professor, Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China. guoqysj@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Trials Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2018; 24(18): 2024-2035 Published online May 14, 2018. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i18.2024
Table 1 Patients’ characteristics n %
Characteristic
No fibrosis,n = 23
Liver fibrosis,n = 50
All,n = 73
Age in yr
39.5 ± 11.1
41.3 ± 12.5
40.8 ± 12.1
Sex
Male
17 (74)
30 (60)
47 (64)
Female
6 (26)
20 (40)
26 (36)
Height in m
1.72 ± 0.09
1.70 ± 1.21
1.71 ± 1.15
Weight in kg
77.21 ± 17.32
78.23 ± 16.12
78.10 ± 16.64
BMI in kg/m2
24.09 ± 4.91
22.06 ± 4.57
23.73 ± 4.65
CHB
21 (34)
41 (66)
62 (85)
CHC
2 (18)
9 (82)
11 (15)
Table 2 Pre, Post, reduction rate of T1 relaxation time, and hepatocyte fraction (%) of patients at different METAVIR fibrosis stages
Fibrosis stage, (METAVIR)
F0, n = 23
F1, n = 19
F2, n = 13
F3, n = 6
F4, n = 12
Total, n = 73
Mean pre-T1 liver
180 ± 28
188 ± 19
174 ± 17
192 ± 22
200 ± 24
186 ± 24
Mean post-T1 liver
356 ± 44
355 ± 38
316 ± 34
336 ± 43
305 ± 50
338 ± 46
RE
0.94 ± 0.18
0.89 ± 0.20
0.94 ± 0.16
0.71 ± 0.17
0.52 ± 0.15
0.84 ± 0.23
HeF (%)
88.77 ± 5.10
84.23 ± 6.99
79.71 ± 8.09
70.90 ± 7.27
62.80 ± 7.01
80.24 ± 11.30
Table 3 Correlation of reduction rate of T1 relaxation time, hepatocyte fraction, and METAVIR fibrosis stages
Pre
Post
RE
HeF
r (95%CI)
0.188 (-0.045 to 0.4003)
-0.525 (-0.674 to 0.336)
-0.773 (-0.852 to 0.661)
-0.808 (-0.875 to 0.709)
P value
0.112
0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Table 4 Performance of the mean reduction rate of T1 relaxation time and hepatocyte fraction for the prediction of METAVIR fibrosis stages according to cut-off values
Parameters
≥ F1
≥ F2
≥ F3
= F4
Cut-off
HeF (%)
82.93
79.24
74.37
74.37
RE
0.75
0.73
0.72
0.72
AUC
HeF (%)
0.837 (0.733-0.913)
0.890 (0.795-0.951)
0.957 (0.881-0.990)
0.957 (0.882-0.991)
RE
0.678 (0.559-0.783)
0.723 (0.606-0.821)
0.921 (0.834-0.971)
0.962 (0.889-0.993)
Sensitivity, %
HeF(%)
72.0 (57.5-83.8)
77.4 (58.9-90.4)
94.4 (72.7-99.9)
100.0 (73.5-100.0)
RE
44.0 (30.0-58.7)
58.1 (39.1-75.5)
88.9 (65.3-98.6)
100.0 (73.5-100.0)
Specificity, %
HeF (%)
82.6 (61.2-95.0)
92.9 (80.5-98.5)
92.7 (82.4-98.0)
85.3 (73.8-93.0)
RE
100.0 (85.2-100.0)
92.9 (80.5-98.5)
92.7 (82.4-98.0)
86.9 (75.8-94.2)
PPV, %
HeF (%)
90.0 (76.3-97.2)
88.9 (70.8-97.6)
81.0 (58.1-94.6)
57.1 (34.0-78.2)
RE
100.0 (84.6-100.0)
85.7 (63.7-97.0)
80.0 (56.3-94.3)
60.0 (36.1-80.9)
NPV, %
HeF (%)
57.6 (39.2-74.5)
84.8 (71.1-93.7)
98.1 (89.7-100.0)
100.0 (93.2-100.0)
RE
45.1 (31.1-59.7)
75.0 (61.1-86.0)
96.2 (87.0-99.5)
100.0 (93.3-100.0)
PLR
HeF (%)
4.14 (1.7-10.3)
10.84 (3.6-32.8)
12.99 (5.0-33.6)
6.78 (3.7-12.4)
RE
_
8.13 (2.6-25.2)
12.22 (4.7-31.8)
7.62 (4.0-14.5)
NLR
HeF (%)
0.34 (0.2-0.5)
0.24 (0.1-0.5)
0.060 (0.009-0.4)
_
RE
0.56 (0.4-0.7)
0.45 (0.3-0.7)
0.12 (0.03-0.4)
_
Citation: Pan S, Wang XQ, Guo QY. Quantitative assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B and C: T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24(18): 2024-2035