Ashraf HH, Palmer J, Dalton HR, Waters C, Luff T, Strugnell M, Murray IA. Can patients determine the level of their dysphagia? World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(6): 1038-1043 [PMID: 28246477 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i6.1038]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Iain Alexander Murray, BSc, MRCP, DM, Consultant Gastroenterologist, Departments of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust, 2 Penventinnie Ln, Treliske, Truro TR1 3LJ, United Kingdom. iain.murray8@nhs.net
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2017; 23(6): 1038-1043 Published online Feb 14, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i6.1038
Table 1 Diagnoses in patients with discrete pathology investigated for dysphagia between 2004 and 2015
Diagnosis
n (%)
Oesophageal cancer
270 (37.2)
Peptic stricture
261 (36.0)
Cricopharyngeal hypertrophy/pharyngeal pouch
95 (13.1)
Schatzki ring
75 (10.3)
Achalasia
24 (3.3)
Pharyngeal pouch and oesophageal cancer
1 (0.1)
Table 2 Accuracy in perceiving correct level of dysphagia correlated to final diagnosis
Diagnosis
Perceived single level (n)
Perceived diffuse level (n)
Absolute match
Achalasia
23
1
34.8%
Oesophageal cancer
243
27
47.3%
Peptic stricture
235
26
38.7%
Pharyngeal pouch
88
7
84.1%
Schatzki ring
66
9
40.9%
Table 3 Effect of level of obstructing lesion on patient ability to accurately localise the cause of their dysphagia
Level of obstructing lesion
Total (n)
Perceived as pharyngeal
Perceived as mid sternal
Perceived as lower sternal
Correct level identified
Upper
115
94
18
3
81.7%
Middle
130
39
64
27
49.2%
Lower
410
66
186
158
38.5%
Total
655
199
268
188
48.2%
Table 4 Associated symptoms and their ability to improve patient localisation of dysphagia n (%)
Symptom
Number reporting symptom
Number with symptom correctly localising dysphagia
P value
Regurgitation/choking
416/647 (67.4)
195/416 (46.9)
0.478
Reflux
339/649 (52.2)
152/339 (44.8)
0.059
Odynophagia
158/651 (24.3)
72/158 (45.6)
0.415
Chest pain
162/649 (25.0)
71/162 (43.8)
0.180
Change in diet
315/651 (48.4)
151/315 (47.9)
0.883
Weight gain
47/635 (7.9)
20/47 (42.6)
0.422
Weight loss
244/611 (39.9)
116/244 (47.5)
0.816
Citation: Ashraf HH, Palmer J, Dalton HR, Waters C, Luff T, Strugnell M, Murray IA. Can patients determine the level of their dysphagia? World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(6): 1038-1043