Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2017; 23(37): 6854-6867
Published online Oct 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i37.6854
Table 1 Potential biological effects of insertion-deletions polymorphism selected in this study
GenedbSNPLocalization1INDELRegionPotential biological effect[84]Potential impact on carcinogenesis
lenghtmRNA splicingmRNA stabilityGene expressionProtein function
ACErs464699417:63488539289IntronXXXAngiogenesis, proliferation, progression and metastases[85]
CASP8rs38341292:2012328096PromoterXApoptosis[86-88]
SGSM3rs5622877122:4041009243'-UTRXXProliferation and apoptosis [83,89-91]
CYP2E1--965'-FlankingXMetabolism of endo- and exogenous[92-97]
CYP19A1rs1157589915:512277493IntronXXXMetabolism of endo- and exogenous[92-97]
HLAGrs3711946296:29830804143'-UTRXXImmune surveillance[98-102]
IL1Ars37835532:11277413843'-UTRXXInduce chronic inflammation and proliferation[103,104]
IL4rs790718785:13268058470IntronXXXImmune surveillance and proliferation[40,39,43,105,106]
MDM2rs373048512:6880706540PromoterXProliferation and apoptosis[107,108]
NFKB1rs283624914:1025009984PromoterXDifferentiation, proliferation and apoptosis [109,110]
TP53rs1787836217:767637216IntronXXXProliferation, apoptosis, repair, differentiation[111-114]
TP53rs1788056017:766816963'-FlankingXXProliferation, apoptosis, repair, differentiation[111-114]
TYMSrs15126436018:67344463'-UTRXXDifferentiation, replication and repair[50,105]
UCP2--453'-UTRXXTumor aggressiveness and metastasis[56]
UGT1A1rs81753472:23376023523'-UTRXXMetabolism of endo- and exogenous[92-97]
XRCC1rs321323919:4357690745'- FlankingXRepair[115-117]
Table 2 Participant demographic and clinical characteristics and their stratification by case and control groups
CharacteristicTotal, n = 280Cases, n = 140Controls, n = 140P value
Age (yr)48 (21-93)59 (23-93)37 (21-81)< 0.001
< 45136 (48.7)23 (16.5)113 (80.7)
≥ 45144 (51.3)116 (83.5)27 (19.3)
Gender< 0.001
Male172 (61.6)62 (44.6)110 (78.6)
Female108 (38.4)78 (55.4)30 (21.4)
Alcohol consumption< 0.001
No180 (65.1)118 (85.5)62 (44.9)
Yes96 (34.9)20 (14.5)76 (55.1)
Eventually56 (20.4)11 (8.0)45 (32.6)
Frequently40 (14.5)9 (6.5)31 (22.5)
Tobacco consumption< 0.001
Never182 (65.4)68 (48.9)114 (82.0)
Already96 (24.6)71 (48.1)25 (18.0)
Former66 (23.8)55 (39.6)11 (7.9)
Current30 (10.8)16 (11.5)14 (10.1)
Table 3 Genetic ancestry distribution between case and control groups
Genetic ancestry (%)Total, n = 280Cases, n = 140Controls, n = 140OR (95%CI)P value
European65.3 ± 15.564.2 ± 15.666.4 ± 15.30.243
95-8050 (17.9)21 (15.1)29 (20.7)1.0 (Reference)
80-7070 (25.1)33 (23.7)37 (26.4)1.23 (0.59-2.56)0.577
70-6067 (24.0)38 (27.3)29 (20.7)1.81 (0.86-3.80)0.117
60-5047 (16.8)22 (15.8)25 (17.9)1.21 (0.54-2.71)0.634
50-4026 (9.3)14 (10.1)12 (8.6)1.61 (0.62-4.18)0.327
40-3011 (3.9)6 (4.3)5 (3.6)1.66 (0.45-6.16)0.451
30-207 (2.5)5 (3.6)2 (1.4)3.45 (0.61-19.54)0.161
20-101 (0.4)-1 (0.7)-
Amerindian16.2 ± 10.116.0 ± 10.316.3 ± 9.90.645
02-1090 (32.3)45 (32.4)45 (32.1)1.0 (Reference)
10-20113 (40.5)60 (43.2)53 (37.9)1.13 (0.65-1.97)0.661
20-3047 (16.8)18 (12.9)29 (20.7)0.62 (0.30-1.27)0.193
30-4021 (7.5)11 (7.9)10 (7.1)1.10 (0.42-2.85)0.844
40-507 (2.5)4 (2.9)2 (2.1)2.00 (0.35-11.47)0.437
50-601 (0.4)1 (0.7)--
African18.6 ± 12.019.8 ± 12.317.3 ± 11.70.049
02-1081 (29.0)36 (25.9)45 (32.1)1.0 (Reference)
10-2089 (31.9)41 (29.5)48 (34.3)1.07 (0.58-1.95)0.832
20-3066 (23.7)38 (27.3)28 (20.0)1.70 (0.88-3.27)0.114
30-4028 (10.0)15 (10.8)13 (9.3)1.44 (0.61-3.42)0.405
40-508 (2.9)5 (3.6)3 (2.1)2.08 (0.47-9.31)0.337
50-605 (1.8)3 (2.2)2 (1.4)1.87 (0.30-11.83)0.504
60-702 (0.7)1 (0.7)1 (0.7)1.25 (0.07-20.68)0.876
Table 4 Genotype and allele frequency in percentage of patients with colorectal cancer and controls
GenedbSNPCase/control (n = 140/140)
Genotype frequency
Allele frequency
HWE
IIIDDDP valueIDP value
ACErs464699421.0/14.349.3/54.329.7/31.40.33545.7/41.454.3/58.60.161
CASP8rs383412934.5/30.046.0/46.419.4/23.60.60557.6/53.242.4/46.80.424
SGSM3rs562287717.2/3.630.2/36.462.6/60.00.27422.3/21.877.7/78.20.415
CYP19A1rs1157589935.8/37.949.6/50.014.6/12.10.8260.3/62.939.7/37.10.402
CYP2E1-0.7/0.717.3/12.982.0/86.40.5889.4/7.190.6/92.60.716
HLAGrs37119462914.7/13.643.4/50.041.9/36.40.53836.4/38.663.6/61.40.514
IL1Ars378355346.0/52.138.8/37.915.1/10.00.36865.5/71.134.5/28.90.348
IL4rs7907187848.9/60.040.3/37.110.8/2.90.01769.1/78.630.9/21.40.223
MDM2rs373048550.4/50.743.2/37.16.5/12.10.21971.9/69.328.1/30.70.132
NFKB1rs2836249138.1/40.746.0/42.115.8/17.10.80661.2/61.838.8/38.20.203
TP53rs178783623.6/1.427.3/32.169.1/66.40.38317.3/17.582.7/82.50.181
TP53rs178805607.2/7.139.6/32.953.2/60.00.48927.0/23.673.0/76.40.297
TYMSrs15126436046.0/42.943.9/42.110.1/15.00.45968.0/63.932.0/36.10.308
UCP2-6.6/9.335.3/44.358.1/46.40.14924.3/31.475.7/68.60.745
UGT1A1rs817534711.5/10.844.6/46.043.9/43.20.78533.8/33.866.2/66.20.735
XRCC1rs321323941.7/42.947.5/45.010.8/12.10.89465.5/65.434.5/34.60.941
Table 5 The logistic regression analyses between case-control and insertion-deletions polymorphism
GeneModelOR (95%CI)P-value
IL4Ins/Ins vs Del/Ins + Del/Del2.26 (1.20-4.31)0.0110
TYMSIns/Ins + Del/Ins vs Del/Del0.26 (0.08-0.75)0.0120
UCP2Del/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins0.48 (0.25-0.90)0.0210
Table 6 Clinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer at diagnosis and follow-up
CharacteristicsCases (n = 140)
Tumor localization
Colon25 (17.9)
Rectosigmoid115 (82.1)
Tumor grade
G1, G2130 (92.9)
G3, G410 (7.1)
Depth of invasion
T1, T237 (26.6)
T3, T489 (64.0)
Tx13 (9.4)
Lymph node involvement
N077 (55.4)
N1, N247 (33.8)
Nx15 (10.8)
Distant metastasis
M0109 (78.4)
M113 (9.4)
Mx17 (12.2)
AJCC stage
StageI31 (22.3)
Stage II43 (30.9)
Stage III43 (30.9)
Stage IV15 (10.8)
Unknown7 (5.1)
Relapse, Yes48 (34.5)
Death, Yes18 (12.9)
Table 7 The significant insertion-deletions associations with anatomic localization
GeneModelOR (95%CI)P value
CASP8Ins/Ins vs Del/Ins + Del/Del0.28 (0.08-0.97)0.0303
NFKB1Ins/Ins vs Del/Ins+Del/Del0.31 (0.10-0.93)0.0276
Table 8 The significant insertion-deletions associations with tumor node metastasis stage risks
GeneModelOR (95%CI)P value
ACEDel/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins2.82 (1.26-6.31)0.0092
HLAGDel/Del + Del/Ins vs Ins/Ins2.74 (1.01-7.42)0.0416
TP53 06 bpDel/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins2.50 (1.23-5.06)0.0099
Table 9 The significant insertion-deletions associations with relapse risks
GeneModelTime of follow-upOR (95%CI)P value
ACEDel/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins2 yr0.32 (0.13-0.77)0.0113
ACEDel/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins3 yr0.37 (0.15-0.91)0.0298
HLAGDel/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins2 yr2.75 (1.07-7.08)0.0281
HLAGDel/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins4 yr2.83 (1.07-7.52)0.0332
HLAGDel/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins5 yr3.47 (1.20-9.99)0.0194
TYMSIns/Ins vs Del/Ins + Del/Del2 yr3.35 (1.36-8.28)0.0058
TYMSIns/Ins vs Del/Ins + Del/Del3 yr3.42 (1.41-8.28)0.0046
UGT1A1Del/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins4 yr3.23 (1.27-8.22)0.0116
UGT1A1Del/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins5 yr3.50 (1.24-9.84)0.0145
Table 10 The significant insertion-deletions associations with death risks
GeneModelTime of follow-upOR (95%CI)P value
SGSM3Del/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins6 yr3.61 (1.01-12.92)0.0487
SGSM3Del/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins7 yr4.60 (1.16-18.23)0.0260
UGT1A1Del/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins6 yr5.30 (1.43-19.73)0.0084
UGT1A1Del/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins7 yr4.64 (1.19-18.10)0.0202
UGT1A1Del/Del vs Del/Ins + Ins/Ins8 yr6.50 (1.47-28.80)0.0091