Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2017; 23(23): 4293-4302
Published online Jun 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4293
Published online Jun 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4293
Table 1 Characteristics of patients
Characteristics | |
Sex (male/female), no. | 31/24 |
Age (yr) | 72.56 ± 10.67 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 24.42 ± 72.56 |
Comorbidity, n (%) | 35 (66.04) |
ASA score, n | |
I | 8 |
II | 19 |
III | 28 |
IV | 0 |
Tumor location, n | |
Lower third | 12 |
Middle third | 30 |
Upper third | 13 |
Table 2 Operative results
Outcomes | |
Overall operative time, min | 354.21 ± 68.8 |
Incision for specimen extraction, n | |
Right McBurney incision | 55 |
length of minilaparotomy, cm | 5 (4-6) |
Intraoperative blood loss, Ml | 126.55 ± 73 |
Intraoperative morbidity, n | 0 |
Intraoperative Mortality, n | 0 |
Conversion, n | 0 |
Extent of lymphadenectomy, n | |
D1 | 0 |
D1+ | 5 |
D2 | 50 |
Table 3 Clinical outcomes during hospitalization and complications
Table 4 Histopathological data
Outcomes | |
Diameter of the tumor, cm | 4.25 (1-8)1 |
Proximal margin, cm | 6 (2-11)1 |
Number of harvested lymph nodes, n | 35 (15-47)1 |
TNM staging, n (%) | |
Stage 0 | 0 |
Stage IA | 8 (14.55) |
Stage IB | 9 (16.37) |
Stage IIA | 12 (21.82) |
Stage IIB | 11 (20.00) |
Stage IIIA | 7 (12.72) |
Stage IIIB | 6 (10.91) |
Stage IIIC | 2 (3.63) |
Stage IV | 0 |
Residual tumor, n | |
R0 | 55 |
R1 | 0 |
R2 | 0 |
Table 5 Literature review on robotic total gastrectomy, overall number of reported cases
Year | Type | Subject | Country | Institution | Period | No. | |
Present study | 2017 | Prospective CS | RTG | Italy | St. Mary’s Hospital of Terni | 2014-2016 | 55 |
Jiang et al[24] | 2015 | Retrospective CS | RAG | China | Nanjing University Medical College | 2010-2012 | 65 |
Kim et al[14] | 2012 | nonRCT | RAG vs LG vs OG | South Korea | Yonsei University College of Medicine | 2005-2010 | 109 |
Son et al[15] | 2014 | nonRCT | RTG vs LTG | ||||
2005-2010 | 51 | ||||||
Woo et al[11] | 2011 | nonRCT | RAG vs LG | 2005-2009 | 62 | ||
Song et al[7] | 2009 | Prospective CS | RAG | 2005-2007 | 33 | ||
Park et al[20] | 2013 | Retrospective CS | RAG | South Korea | National Cancer Center | 2009-2012 | 46 |
Yoon et al[17] | 2012 | nonRCT | RTG vs LTG | ||||
2009-2011 | 36 | ||||||
Kang et al[13] | 2012 | nonRCT | RAG vs LG | South Korea | Ajou University School of Medicine | 2008-2011 | 16 |
Hur et al[8] | 2010 | Retrospective CS | RAG | 2010 | 2 | ||
Hyun et al[18] | 2013 | nonRCT | RAG vs LG | South Korea | Korea University Anam Hospital | 2009-2010 | 9 |
Son et al[15] | 2012 | nonRCT | RAG vs LG | South Korea | Seoul University Bundang Hospital | 2007-2011 | 1 |
Junfeng et al[21] | 2014 | nonRCT | RAG vs LG | China | Third Military Medical University | 2010-2013 | 26 |
Liu et al[19] | 2013 | Prospective CS | RAG | China | Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu | 2011-2013 | 54 |
Giulianotti et al[25] | 2003 | Retrospective CS | RAG | Italy | Misericordia Hospital of Grosseto | 2000-2002 | 10 |
Coratti et al[26] | 2015 | Retrospective CS | RAG | Italy | 2000-2014 | 38 | |
D'Annibale et al[10] | 2011 | Retrospective CS | RAG | Italy | S. Giovanni Addolorata Hospital | 2004-2009 | 11 |
Caruso et al[9] | 2011 | nonRCT | RAG vs OG | Italy | Hospital of Spoleto | 2006-2010 | 12 |
Suda et al[23] | 2014 | nonRCT | RAG vs LG | Japan | Fujita Health University | 2009-2012 | 30 |
Huang et al[12] | 2012 | nonRCT | RAG vs LG vs OG | Taiwan | Taipei Veterans General Hospital | 2010-2012 | 7 |
Vasilescu et al[16] | 2012 | Retrospective CS | RAG | Romania | Fundeni Clinical Institute | 2008-2012 | 19 |
Zawadzki et al[27] | 2014 | CR | RAG | Poland | Wroclaw Medical University | 2014 | 1 |
Parisi et al[5] | 2015 | Prospective CS | RTG | Italy | St. Mary’s Hospital of Terni | 2014-2015 | 22 |
Total1 | 466 |
Table 6 Literature review on robotic total gastrectomy, details of the reported data
Robot - Assistance | Type | E-J anastomosis | Anastomosis performance | Site of minilaparotomy | Operative and clinical data | Patients and tumor details | |||
Lymphadenectomy | Stomach mobilization | Reconstruction | |||||||
Jiang et al[24] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Circular stapler | Not provided | Provided | Provided | |
Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Robot-sewn | Not provided | |||||
Kim et al[14] | Not provided | Not provided | Not provided | Roux-en-Y | Not provided | Not provided | Not provided | Lack | Lack |
Son et al[15] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Circular stapler | Upper midline | Provided | Provided | |
Roux-en-Y | INTRA LAP | Circular stapler | Left lower port | ||||||
Woo et al[11] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Not provided | Not provided | Lack | Lack | |
Roux-en-Y | INTRA LAP | Not provided | Not provided | ||||||
Song et al[7] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Circular stapler | Upper midline | Lack | Lack | |
Roux-en-Y | INTRA LAP | Circular stapler | Not provided | ||||||
Park et al[20] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Not provided | Upper midline | Provided | Lack | |
Yoon et al[17] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Circular stapler | Not provided | Provided | Provided | |
Kang et al[13] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Circular stapler | Upper midline | Lack | Lack | |
Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Robot-sewn | Not provided | |||||
Hur et al[8] | Performed | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Robot-sewn | Not provided | Lack | Lack |
Hyun et al[18] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Circular stapler | Upper midline | Lack | Lack | |
Not provided | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Not provided | Umbilical port | |||||
Son et al[15] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Not provided | Not provided | Lack | Lack | |
Junfeng et al[21] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | EXTRA | Circular stapler | Upper midline | Provided | Provided | |
Liu et al[19] | Performed | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Robot-sewn | Camera port | Lack | Lack |
Giulianotti et al[25] | Performed | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Circular stapler | Not provided | Lack | Lack |
Coratti et al[26] | Performed | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Robot-sewn | Not provided | Provided | Provided |
D'Annibale et al[10] | Performed | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Circular stapler | Suprapubic | Lack | Lack |
Caruso et al[9] | Performed | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Circular stapler | Upper midline | Lack | Lack |
Suda et al[23] | Performed | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Linear stapler | Not provided | Provided | Provided |
Huang et al[12] | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA LAP | Circular stapler | Periumbilical | Lack | Lack | |
Vasilescu et al[16] | Performed | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Circular stapler | Not provided | Lack | Lack |
Parisi et al[5] | Performed | Performed | Performed | Roux-en-Y | INTRA | Robot-sewn | McBurney | Provided | Provided |
- Citation: Parisi A, Ricci F, Gemini A, Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Palazzini G, D’Andrea V, Desiderio J. New totally intracorporeal reconstructive approach after robotic total gastrectomy: Technical details and short-term outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(23): 4293-4302
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i23/4293.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4293