Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2017; 23(23): 4285-4292
Published online Jun 21, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4285
Table 1 Patients’ characteristics n (%)
Patients (n = 49)
Age yr (mean; extreme)33; 14-70
Sex ratio (men/women)0.58
Familial history of IBD4 (8.2)
Smoking21 (42.9)
Mean duration of CD (mo)72 (0-300)
Location
L1 ileal4 (8.2)
L2 colonic15 (30.6)
L3 ileocolonic22 (44.9)
L2 or L3 + L4 upper disease8 (16.3)
Disease behavior
Inflammatory34 (69.4)
Structuring8 (16.3)
Penetrating7 (14.3)
Extraintestinal manifestations11 (22.4)
Ileocolonic resection11 (22.4)
Previous perianal surgery40 (81.6)
CRP (mg/L)11.5 (1.6-167)
Albumin rate (g/L)35.2 (20-49.2)
Table 2 Baseline magnetic resonance imaging evaluation n (%)
Patients (n = 49)
Van Assche score (mean)13
Ramified fistula13 (26.5)
Multiple fistula10 (20.4)
Inter/extrasphincteric fistula31 (63.3)
Transsphincteric fistula15 (30.6)
Suprasphincteric fistula3 (6.1)
Infralevatoric extension43 (87.8)
Supralevatoric extension6 (12.2)
Abscess19 (38.8)
Rectal involvement21 (42.9)
T2 hyperintensity
Absent3 (6.1)
Mild11 (22.4)
Pronounced35 (71.4)
Enhancement49 (100)
Anorecto-vaginal fistula7 (14.3)