Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2016; 22(24): 5589-5597
Published online Jun 28, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i24.5589
Table 1 Relationship between miR-422a and clinical parameters in colorectal cancer tissues
Clinical parameterNumber of cases (n = 102)miR-422a expression, median (min-max)P value
Gender0.704
Male631.446 (0.074-130.774)
Female391.617 (0.167-33.543)
Age (yr)0.328
≤ median491.637 (0.088-130.774)
> median531.715 (0.074-21.871)
Tumor location0.092
Colon581.798 (0.088-130.774)
Rectum441.887 (0.074-33.543)
Differentiation0.150
Well121.798 (0.074-130.744)
Moderate671.922 (0.166-21.871)
Poor232.088 (0.088-20.406)
Tumor size0.527
≤ 5 cm642.127 (0.074-130.744)
> 5 cm382.353 (0.167-21.871)
Local invasion0.004
T1–T2553.257 (0.206-130.744)
T3–T4471.617 (0.074-20.406)
Lymph node metastasis0.002
No702.863 (0.359-130.744)
Yes321.445 (0.074-20.406)
TNM stage< 0.001
I233.877 (0.265-15.999)
II423.253 (0.074-13.566)
III371.445 (0.329-130.744)
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival in colorectal cancer patients
VariableCategoryUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR95%CIP valueHR95%CIP value
GenderMale vs Female0.9430.493-1.8720.810
Age ≤ Median vs > Median1.4360.528-3.1570.148
Tumor locationColon vs Rectum0.8620.484-1.7060.603
Tumor size ≤ 5 cm vs > 5 cm1.0930.568-2.1940.873
DifferentiationWell and moderate vs Poor1.0180.462-2.1800.1600.9860.486-2.0060.074
Local invasionT1-T2 vs T3-T41.6821.020-2.6280.0111.4600.746-2.6320.482
Lymph node metastasisYes vs No1.1820.634-2.530< 0.00111.2620.584-2.6800.306
TNM stageI and II vs III2.7381.509-4.265< 0.00112.9421.426-4.3780.0031
MiR-422a levelLow vs High0.3060.108-0.7630.00110.5680.245-1.0820.0151