Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2015; 21(7): 2116-2123
Published online Feb 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2116
Table 1 Patient characteristics n (%)
Patient without ADVPatient with ADVP value
(n = 49)(n = 30)
Age (yr)
At the initiation of NA51.1 ± 10.849.9 ± 10.0NS
At the evaluation of PKTD55.7 ± 11.158.9 ± 9.9NS
Male/female30/1921/9NS
BMI (kg/m2)23.0 ± 2.922.6 ± 3.0NS
Current smokers4 (8.2)4 (13.3)NS
Habitual drinkers5 (10.2)2 (6.7)NS
Hypertension12 (24.5)12 (40.0)NS
Diabetes1 (2.0)2 (6.7)NS
Treatment duration of NA (mo)54.8 ± 38.8107.5 ± 30.1< 0.001
SLC22A6 (hOAT1) 4531 G/A,
G/G37 (75.5)17 (56.7)NS
G/A11 (22.4)12 (40.0)
A/A1 (2.0)1 (3.3)
ABCC2 (MRP2) -24 C/T, rs717620
C/C28 (57.1)17 (56.7)NS
C/T19 (38.8)9 (30.0)
T/T2 (4.1)4 (13.3)
HBeAg-positive22.416.7NS
HBV DNA-positive63.330.00.004
HBV genotype
B/C/undetected8/36/50/28/20.048
Medicated
LAM19 (38.8)29 (96.7)< 0.001
ETV29 (59.2)1 (3.3)< 0.001
TDF1 (2.0)0NS
AST (U/L)29.4 ± 10.531.0 ± 10.8NS
ALT (U/L)28.5 ± 16.630.5 ± 19.6NS
ALP (U/L)242.9 ± 112.0369.8 ± 293.80.03
Serum calcium (mmol/L)2.3 ± 0.82.3 ± 0.1NS
Serum phosphate (mmol/L)1.1 ± 0.10.9 ± 0.2< 0.001
Serum uric acid (umol/L)324.6 ± 71.9266.1 ± 112.00.014
UBCR (mg/gCre)117.1 (50.5-271.6)805.2 (61.8-10489.6)< 0.001
Phosphate diabetes09 (30.0)< 0.001
Renal hypouricemia010 (33.3)< 0.001
β2-microglobulinuria3 (6.1)15 (50.0)< 0.001
Nondiabetic glucosuria05 (16.7)0.003
Metabolic acidosis02 (6.7)NS
eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)
At the initiation of NA82.6 ± 15.579.9 ± 14.9NS
At the evaluation of PKTD76.3 ± 18.263.0 ± 16.40.002
Table 2 Differences between 30 patients treated with adefovir dipivoxil with/without proximal kidney tubular dysfunction n (%)
PKTD (-)PKTD (+)P value
(n = 21)(n = 9)
Age (yr)
At the initiation of ADV52.1 ± 9.359.0 ± 9.7NS
At the evaluation of PKTD56.0 ± 9.165.7 ± 8.60.012
Male/female16/55/4NS
BMI (kg/m2)23.3 ± 3.020.8 ± 2.50.038
Current smokers4 (19.0)0NS
Habitual drinkers2 (9.5)0NS
Hypertension9 (42.9)3 (33.3)NS
Diabetes1 (4.8)1 (11.1)NS
Treatment duration of NA (mo)104.1 ± 32.1115.1 ± 25.2NS
Treatment duration of ADV (mo)56.0 ± 33.586.0 ± 21.80.021
SLC22A6 (hOAT1) 4531 G/A,
G/G13 (61.9)4 (44.4)NS
G/A8 (38.1)4 (44.4)
A/A01 (11.1)
ABCC2 (MRP2) -24 C/T, rs717620
C/C12 (57.1)5 (55.6)NS
C/T5 (23.8)4 (44.4)
T/T4 (19.0)0
eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)
At the initiation of ADV81.4 ± 11.677.1 ± 17.0NS
At the evaluation of PKTD70.0 ± 10.946.9 ± 15.8< 0.001
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of the kidney tubular dysfunction of patients treated with adefovir dipivoxil
OR95%CIP value
1Model 1
Age at initiation of ADV (per 5 yr)2.901.16-7.240.023
Treatment duration of ADV (per year)2.311.20-4.450.013
2Model 2
Age at initiation of ADV (per 5 yr)5.011.07-23.380.040
Treatment duration of ADV (per year)3.211.20-8.570.020
Table 4 Genotype at ABCC2 and parameters of proximal kidney tubular dysfunction and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 patients treated with adefovir dipivoxil n (%)
Genotype CC or CTGenotype TTP value
(n = 26)(n = 4)
Serum phosphate (mmol/L)0.86 ± 0.211.00 ± 0.25NS
TmP/GFR (mmol/L)0.73 ± 0.280.95 ± 0.42NS
Serum uric acid (umol/L)267.2 ± 120.3258.7 ± 26.4NS
FEUA (%)16.6 ± 14.69.5 ± 1.60.025
UBCR (mg/gCr)996.3 (68.2-14555.9)201.4 (81.5-497.7)0.038
Phosphate diabetes8 (30.8)1 (25.0)NS
Renal hypouricemia10 (38.5)0NS
β2-microglobulinuria14 (53.8)1 (25.0)NS
Nondiabetic glucosuria5 (19.2)0NS
Metabolic acidosis2 (7.7)0NS
eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2)62.8 ± 17.664.4 ± 2.1NS