Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2015; 21(6): 1900-1906
Published online Feb 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1900
Published online Feb 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1900
Quality indicator |
1 Appropriate indication |
2 Informed consent |
3 Assessment of procedural difficulty |
4 Prophylactic antibiotics |
5 Cannulation rates |
Desired duct |
Use of precut |
6 Extraction of common bile duct stones |
7 Biliary stent placement |
8 Complete documentation |
9 Complication rates: pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, and cholangitis |
DAPt | DOSERPt | DAPf | DOSERPf | DAPa | DOSERPa | FLUORO_TIME | |
Mean | 0.0022529 | 0.28213 | 0.1269457 | 0.126946 | 0.000296 | 0.001784 | 7.31 |
Minimum | 0.0000013 | 0.00004 | 0.0000013 | 0.00004 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
Maximum | 0.004545 | 1.92667 | 0.0042557 | 0.4832 | 0.000289 | 0.0291 | 2141 |
ALARA principles | |
Keep the patient away from the radiation source | Use fluorosave instead of acquisition images |
Keep the detector close to the patient | Keep angulation to a minimum |
Lower the exposure rate (PPS) | Add 0.1 mm Cu filtration for all protocols |
Use lowest needed magnification | Step back during acquisition |
Use collimation | Use personal protective equipment |
Limit fluoroscopy on-time | Use lead shielding on the fluoroscopy unit |
- Citation: Kachaamy T, Harrison E, Pannala R, Pavlicek W, Crowell MD, Faigel DO. Measures of patient radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: Beyond fluoroscopy time. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(6): 1900-1906
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i6/1900.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1900