Published online Feb 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1900
Peer-review started: July 13, 2014
First decision: August 6, 2014
Revised: September 7, 2014
Accepted: October 14, 2014
Article in press: October 15, 2014
Published online: February 14, 2015
Processing time: 215 Days and 3.3 Hours
AIM: To determine whether fluoroscope time is a good predictor of patient radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a tertiary care setting. Data related to radiation exposure were collected. The following measures were obtained: Fluoroscopy time (FT), dose area product (DAP) and dose at reference point (DOSERP). Coefficients of determination were calculated to analyze the correlation between FT, DAP and DOSRP. Agreement between FT and DAP/DOSRP was assessed using Bland Altman plots.
RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-three data sets were obtained. Fluoroscopy time average was 7.3 min. Fluoroscopy related radiation accounted for 86% of the total DAP while acquisition films related radiation accounted for 14% of the DAP. For any given FT there are wide ranges of DAP and DOSERP and the variability in both increases as fluoroscopy time increases. The coefficient of determination (R2) on the non transformed data for DAP and DOSERP versus FT were respectively 0.416 and 0.554. While fluoroscopy use was the largest contributor to patient radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP), there is a wide variability in DAP and DOSERP that is not accounted for by FT. DAP and DOSERP increase in variability as FT increases. This translates into poor accuracy of FT in predicting DAP and DOSERP at higher radiation doses.
CONCLUSION: DAP and DOSERP in addition to FT should be adopted as new ERCP quality measures to estimate patient radiation exposure.
Core tip: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) performance requires endoscopic skills and the use of fluoroscopy with inherent patient and staff radiation exposure. Current ERCP quality measures do not include any measures of radiation. There has been a suggestion to include fluoroscopy time as a radiation quality measure in ERCP. This article provides data on the strength of correlation between fluoroscopy time and more direct measures of radiation exposure such as dose area product and dose at reference point. It also provides a recommendation to include all three measures as quality measures for ERCP. The article presents important principles to achieve the as low as reasonable achievable radiation doses during ERCP.