Topic Highlight
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2015; 21(36): 10327-10335
Published online Sep 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i36.10327
Table 1 Subclassification system for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma proposed by Bolondi et al[43]
BCLC substageB1B2B3B4
Child-Pugh Score5-6-75-678-9
Beyond Milan and Within Ut-7InOutOutAny
ECOG-PS0000-1
PVTNoNoNoNo
1st optionTACETACE or TAREBSC
AlternativeLT, TACE + ablationSORResearch trialsTACE, SORLT
Table 2 Potential role of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
StagePotential role of TACE
BCLC 0TACE may be considered a viable alternative treatment to RFA for treating single HCCs measuring 2 cm or smaller when RFA is not feasible
BCLC A1: The combination of TACE and RFA is safe and provides better local tumor control than RFA alone in the treatment of medium sized HCC (3-5 cm)
2: For a large solitary HCC (> 5 cm), HR provides better overall survival than HCC, but TACE could be considered as an alternative initial treatment when HR is not feasible
3: TACE can be used to downstage the tumor within the Milan criteria before LT or serve as a bridge to LT
BCLC B1: TACE is the standard of care for this stratum of patients
2: Combination with other therapies such as RFA and sorafenib may provide better patient survival or local tumor control
BCLC C1: Repeated TACE showed significant survival benefits in patients with advanced HCC compared with supportive care
2: Sorafenib plus TACE has a demonstrable effect in delaying tumor progression
3: Combination with radiotherapy has resulted in better survival in patients with HCC and PVT