Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2015; 21(34): 9982-9992
Published online Sep 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9982
Table 1 Cases of the virtual hepatectomy using Liversim
CasesAge (yr)GenderDiagnosisSurgeryOperation time (min)Bleeding (mL)Postoperative stay (d)
168MHCCLateral sectionectomy33932013
256MMetastatic tumor(rectal cancer)Extended left hepatectomy4065079
362MMetastatic tumor(colon cancer)Right hepatectomy374120015
460MMetastatic tumor(gastric cancer)Posterior sectionectomy39778021
577MHCCLeft hepatectomy29037013
660MHCCAnterior sectionectomy497160015
769MICCSegmentectomy (S6)2322359
850MMetastatic tumor(colon cancer)Right hepatectomy45447010
971FICCExtended left hepatectomy43615709
1055MHCCPosterior sectionectomy34213019
1156FHCCRight hepatectomy48146012
Median6039747013
Table 2 Characteristics of the patients n (%)
CharacteristicsVINCENT (n = 99)Liversim (n = 11)
Age (yr)
Median (range)65 (21-84)60 (50-77)
Gender
Male78 (79)9 (82)
Female21 (21)2 (18)
Diagnosis
HCC61 (62)5 (45)
ICC14 (14)2 (18)
Metastasis24 (24)4 (36)
Procedure
Hemihepatectomy or larger24 (24)6 (55)
Sectionectomy27 (27)4 (36)
Segmentectomy or smaller48 (48)1 (9)
Table 3 Perioperative outcomes
Perioperative outcomes (median)VINCENT (n = 99)Liversim (n = 11)P value
Operation time (min)304 (110-846)397 (232-497)0.30
Blood loss (mL)510 (18-5120)470 (130-1600)0.44
Postoperative stay (d)12 (6-100)13 (9-21)0.36