Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2015; 21(3): 935-943
Published online Jan 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.935
Published online Jan 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.935
Table 1 Operative procedures for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Operative modality | Number |
Hepatic resection (n = 85) | |
Major resection (n = 40) | |
Partial hepatectomy | 24 |
Right trisectionectomy | 1 |
Left trisectionectomy | 4 |
Right hemihepatectomy | 1 |
Left hemihepatectomy | 8 |
Central bisectionectomy | 2 |
Minor resection (n = 45) | |
Partial hepatectomy | 33 |
Right anterior sectionectomy | 2 |
Right posterior sectionectomy | 3 |
Left lateral sectionectomy | 4 |
Bisegmentectomy | 3 |
Combined resection (n = 10) | |
Spleen | 2 |
Gallbladder | 8 |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival of hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients included in this study
Variable | n | Univariate analysis | Multivariateanalyses | ||||
1-yr | 5-yr | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | ||
Gender | 0.205 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Female | 19 | 66% | 23% | ||||
Male | 66 | 58% | 10% | ||||
Age | 0.769 | NA | NA | NA | |||
≤ 60 | 59 | 64% | 13% | ||||
> 60 | 26 | 50% | 12% | ||||
Capsule formation | 0.522 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Yes | 32 | 55% | 10% | ||||
No | 53 | 63% | 14% | ||||
Cirrhosis | 0.002 | 1.981 | 1.197-3.278 | 0.008 | |||
Yes | 48 | 56% | 0% | ||||
No | 37 | 65% | 27% | ||||
Child-Pugh class | 0.257 | NA | NA | NA | |||
A | 76 | 61% | 14% | ||||
B | 9 | 18% | 0% | ||||
AFP (ng/mL) | 0.342 | NA | NA | NA | |||
≤ 20 | 48 | 51% | 11% | ||||
> 20 | 37 | 72% | 15% | ||||
CA19-9 (U/mL) | 0.342 | NA | NA | NA | |||
≤ 37 | 55 | 66% | 14% | ||||
> 37 | 30 | 50% | 10% | ||||
Gross type | 0.402 | NA | NA | NA | |||
MF | 63 | 61% | 13% | ||||
PI + IG | 22 | 56% | 11% | ||||
Differentiation | 0.119 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Well or Moderate | 63 | 64% | 16% | ||||
Poor | 22 | 50% | 0% | ||||
Tumor number | < 0.001 | 2.653 | 1.562-4.508 | < 0.001 | |||
Single | 60 | 69% | 17% | ||||
Multiple | 25 | 38% | 0% | ||||
Tumor size | 0.006 | NA | NA | NA | |||
< 5 cm | 43 | 70% | 21% | ||||
≥ 5 cm | 42 | 49% | 5% | ||||
LN metastasis | 0.005 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Yes | 11 | 31% | 0% | ||||
No | 74 | 64% | 14% | ||||
Vascular invasion | 0.013 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Yes | 11 | 24% | 0% | ||||
No | 74 | 64% | 14% | ||||
TNM classification | < 0.001 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Stage I or II | 61 | 66% | 17% | ||||
Stage III or IV | 24 | 43% | 0% | ||||
Width of resection margin | 0.274 | NA | NA | NA | |||
< 1 cm | 37 | 69% | 17% | ||||
≥ 1 cm | 48 | 53% | 9% | ||||
Surgical procedure | 0.962 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Major hepatectomy | 40 | 61% | 13% | ||||
Minor hepatectomy | 45 | 59% | 12% |
Table 3 Sites of initial recurrences in hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients after curative resection
Site of initial recurrence | No. of patients |
Liver, lymph nodes | 6 |
Liver, lung | 1 |
Liver | 46 |
Lymph nodes | 8 |
Peritoneum | 5 |
Wound site | 1 |
Bone | 1 |
Lung | 2 |
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for disease-free survival in hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients included in this study
Variable | n | Univariate analysis | Multivariateanalyses | ||||
1-yr | 5-yr | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | ||
Gender | 0.312 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Female | 19 | 50% | 0% | ||||
Male | 66 | 32% | 4% | ||||
Age | 0.853 | NA | NA | NA | |||
≤ 60 | 59 | 33% | 1% | ||||
> 60 | 26 | 42% | 5% | ||||
Capsule formation | 0.970 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Yes | 32 | 40% | 7% | ||||
No | 53 | 33% | 0% | ||||
Cirrhosis | 0.003 | 1.919 | 1.153-3.192 | 0.012 | |||
Yes | 48 | 22% | 0% | ||||
No | 37 | 52% | 5% | ||||
Child-Pugh class | 0.237 | NA | NA | NA | |||
A | 76 | 50% | 20% | ||||
B | 9 | 27% | 0% | ||||
AFP (ng/mL) | 0.648 | NA | NA | NA | |||
≤ 20 | 48 | 32% | 3% | ||||
> 20 | 37 | 40% | 2% | ||||
CA19-9 (U/mL) | 0.189 | NA | NA | NA | |||
≤ 37 | 55 | 39% | 3% | ||||
> 37 | 30 | 29% | 2% | ||||
Gross type | 0.917 | NA | NA | NA | |||
MF | 63 | 37% | 3% | ||||
PI + IG | 22 | 30% | 0% | ||||
Differentiation | 0.076 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Well or Moderate | 63 | 42% | 3% | ||||
Poor | 22 | 18% | 0% | ||||
Tumor number | < 0.001 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Single | 60 | 48% | 3% | ||||
Multiple | 25 | 5% | 0% | ||||
Tumor size | 0.091 | NA | NA | NA | |||
< 5 cm | 43 | 44% | 1% | ||||
≥ 5 cm | 42 | 27% | 5% | ||||
LN metastasis | < 0.001 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Yes | 11 | 0% | 0% | ||||
No | 74 | 40% | 3% | ||||
Vascular invasion | 3.779 | 1.601-8.923 | 0.020 | ||||
Yes | 11 | ||||||
No | 74 | ||||||
TNM classification | < 0.001 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Stage I or II | 61 | 0% | 0% | ||||
Stage III or IV | 24 | 51% | 20% | ||||
Width of resection margin | < 0.001 | NA | NA | NA | |||
< 1 cm | 37 | 49% | 4% | ||||
≥ 1 cm | 48 | 0% | 0% | ||||
Surgical procedure | 0.391 | NA | NA | NA | |||
Major hepatectomy | 40 | 41% | 2% | ||||
Minor hepatectomy | 45 | 31% | 3% |
Table 5 Comparison of the pathological factors according to the extent of lymph node dissection
Variable | LND (-) | LN sampling | Regional LND | P value |
Cirrhosis | 0.439 | |||
Yes | 17 | 13 | 18 | |
No | 18 | 9 | 10 | |
Gross type | 0.617 | |||
MF | 24 | 17 | 22 | |
PI + IG | 11 | 5 | 6 | |
Differentiation | 0.478 | |||
Well or Moderate | 25 | 15 | 23 | |
Poor | 10 | 7 | 5 | |
Capsule formation | 0.931 | |||
Yes | 14 | 8 | 10 | |
No | 21 | 14 | 18 | |
Tumor number | 0.512 | |||
Single | 27 | 14 | 18 | |
Multiple | 8 | 8 | 10 | |
Tumor size | 0.145 | |||
< 5 cm | 21 | 12 | 10 | |
≥ 5 cm | 14 | 10 | 18 | |
Pathologica LN metastasis | 0.085 | |||
Yes | NA | 2 | 9 | |
No | NA | 20 | 19 | |
Vascular invasion | 0.181 | |||
Yes | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
No | 33 | 19 | 22 |
- Citation: Wu ZF, Wu XY, Zhu N, Xu Z, Li WS, Zhang HB, Yang N, Yao XQ, Liu FK, Yang GS. Prognosis after resection for hepatitis B virus-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(3): 935-943
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i3/935.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.935