Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2015; 21(20): 6341-6351
Published online May 28, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6341
Table 1 General condition sheet of the included studies
Ref.Sample sizeAgeGender (M/F)Smoking (%)Alcohol abuse (%)H. pylori infection positive (%)NSAID user (%)Drug typeIntervention
Outcome assessment timeThe main outcomes
PPI groupH2RA group
Hsu et al[13]P:52P: 63.2 ± 18.P: 41/11P: 32.7P: 13.5NAP: 26.9P: Pantoprazole40 mg intravenous/12 h 3 d, followed by 40 mg/d orally50 mg intravenous/8 h, followed by 150 mg/12 h orally8 wk12345
H:50H: 64.7 ± 13.8H: 37/13H: 32.0H: 8.0H: 320H: Ranitidine
Ye et al[14]P:41P: 61.2 ± 9.0P: 28/13NANAP: 61.0NAP: Omeprazole20 mg/d orally20 mg/12 h orally28 d1
H:41H: 58.5 ± 9.4H: 24/17H: 56.1H: Famotidine
Jensen et al[15]P:72P: 59.6 ± 16.1P: 51/21NANANAP: 69P: Pantoprazole80 mg bolus and 8 mg/h infusion 3 d50 mg bolus and 6.25 mg/h infusion 3 d3 d, 7 d, 30 d1
H:77H: 55.6 ± 16.8H: 52/25H: 71H: Ranitidine
Lin et al[16]Pa:67Pa: 67Pa: 58/9NANANAPa: 26.9P: Omeprazolea: 40 mg intravenous/12 h 3 d, followed by 20 mg/d orally400 mg intravenous/12 h 3 d, followed by 400 mg/12 h orally14 d12345
Pb:66Pb: 71Pb: 57/9Pb: 24.2H: Cimetidineb: 40 mg intravenous/6 h 3 d, followed by 20 mg/d orally
H:67H: 68H: 61/6H: 29.9
Jeong et al[17]P:85P: 62.9 ± 9.4P: 52/33NANAP: 61.9NAP: Pantoprazole80 mg bolus and 8 mg/h infusion d1, 40 mg intravenous/12 h d2-3, followed by 40 mg/d orally20 mg intravenous/12 h d2, followed by 20 mg/d orally24 h, 7 d, 14 d123
H:79H: 63.5 ± 7.8H: 53/26H: 64.1H: Famotidine
Uedo et al[18]P:64P: 68.1 ± 8.5112/33NANA11.511.5P: Rabeprazole20 mg/d orally800 mg/d orally8 wk1
H:66H: 65.7± 7.6H: Cimetidine
Imaeda et al[19]P:62P: 68.4 ± 8.0P: 47/15P: 58.1 H: 49.2NAP: 61.3NAP: Lansoprazole30 mg intravenous/12 h 2 d, followed by 30 mg/d orally75 mg intravenous/12 h 2 d, followed by 75 mg/12 h orally8 wk1
H:61H: 67.6 ± 8.5H: 52/9H: 62.3H: Roxatidine
Sakurada et al[20]P:40P: 65.8 ± 2.5P: 35/5NANAP: 77.5P: 35.0P: Omeprazole20 mg intravenous/12 h 3 d, followed by 20 mg/d orally20 mg intravenous/12 h 3 d, followed by 20 mg/d orally6-8 wk15
H:37H:60.2 ± 1.7H: 31/6H: 78.4H: 29.7H: Famotidine
Tomita et al[21]P:77P: 70.4 ± 8.7P: 59/18NANANANAP: Omeprazole20 mg/12 h intravenous 3 d, followed by 20 mg/d orally40 mg bolus/d8 wk1
H:79H: 70.6 ± 9.5H: 59/20H: Famotidine
Lin et al[22]P:50P: 65 H: 66.5P: 46/4P: 34.0P:12.0NANAP: Omeprazole40 mg intravenous and 160 mg infusion 3 d, followed by 20 mg/12 h orally 2 m300 mg intravenous and 1200 mg infusion 3 d, followed by 400 mg/12 h orally 2 m3 d, 14 d12345
H:50H:43/7H: 28.0H: 12.0H: Cimetidine
Table 2 Subgroup analyses of recurrent bleeding rate
Number of studiesNumber of subjectsOR (95%CI)Heterogeneity withinsubgroupsDifference betweensubgroups
End-point time
Overall1020760.33 (0.24-0.45)No (P = 0.20, I2 = 23%)No (P = 0.42, I2 = 0%)
24 h11640.08 (0.00-1.46)NA
3 d22490.23 (0.07-0.76)Yes (P = 0.13, I2 = 56%)
7 d23130.32 (0.13-0.79)No (P = 0.37, I2 = 0%)
14 d34640.26 (0.16-0.43)Yes (P = 0.07, I2 = 58%)
28-30 d22310.45 (0.15-1.36)NA
6 wk or more55880.53 (0.30-0.94)No (P = 0.42, I2 = 0%)
Nation
Overall1012830.36 (0.25-0.51)No (P = 0.13, I2 = 35%)No (P = 0.42, I2 = 0%)
Japan44860.63 (0.33-1.17)No (P = 0.51, I2 = 0%)
China34020.25 (0.14-0.42)Yes (P = 0.06, I2 = 59%)
South Korea22460.25 (0.07-0.95)NA
United States11490.45 (0.15-1.36)NA
Intervention drug PPI
Overall810300.32 (0.21-0.48)No (P = 0.13, I2 = 37%)No (P = 0.93, I2 = 0%)
Omeprazole56150.32 (0.20-0.52)Yes (P = 0.03, I2 = 61%)
Pantoprazole34150.31 (0.15-0.65)No (P = 0.69, I2 = 0%)
Intervention drug H2RA
Overall89960.33 (0.22-0.48)No (P = 0.14, I2 = 36%)No (P = 0.18, I2 = 41.6%)
Cimetidine34300.27 (0.16-0.44)Yes (P = 0.07, I2 = 58%)
Famotidine33150.85 (0.28-2.61)No (P = 0.56, I2 = 0%)
Ranitidine22510.34 (0.14-0.85)No (P = 0.45, I2 = 0%)