Sun KY, Xu JB, Chen SL, Yuan YJ, Wu H, Peng JJ, Chen CQ, Guo P, Hao YT, He YL. Novel immunological and nutritional-based prognostic index for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5961-5971 [PMID: 26019461 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5961]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yu-Long He, MD, PhD, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Second Road, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China. ylh@medmail.com.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 5961-5971 Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5961
Table 1 The list of multiple immunological and nutritional-based prognostic indices for gastric cancer
Combined marker
Score
Prognostic Nutritional Index
≥ 48.2
1
< 48.2
2
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio
≤ 1.83
1
> 1.83
2
Platelet-lymphocyte ratio
≤ 140
1
> 140
2
Canton score
PNI ≥ 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L
0
PNI ≥ 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L
1
PNI ≥ 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L
1
PNI < 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L
1
PNI ≥ 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L
2
PNI < 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L
2
PNI < 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L
2
PNI < 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L
3
Table 2 Relationship between clinicopathological factors, postoperative complications, and prognostic nutritional index
Variable
n (%)
PNI-H
PNI-L
P value
Age (yr)
0.407
≤ 65
445 (70.4)
235
210
> 65
187 (29.6)
92
95
Sex
0.958
Male
413 (65.3)
214
199
Female
219 (34.7)
113
106
Resectability
< 0.001
0
509 (80.5)
285
224
1, 2
123 (19.5)
42
81
Tumor depth
0.006
T1, T2
126 (19.9)
79
47
T3, T4
506 (80.1)
248
258
Lymph node
0.015
N0
193 (30.5)
114
79
N1-3
439 (69.5)
213
226
Distant metastasis
< 0.001
M0
474 (75.0)
266
208
M1
158 (25.0)
61
97
Pathological stage
0.002
I, II
207 (32.8)
125
82
III, IV
425 (67.2)
202
223
WBC
0.279
≤ 11 × 109/L
597 (94.5)
312
285
> 11 × 109/L
35 (5.5)
15
20
ALB
< 0.001
≥ 35 g/L
507 (80.2)
325
182
< 35 g/L
125 (19.8)
2
123
PLT
0.072
≤ 300 × 109/L
484 (76.6)
260
224
> 300 × 109/L
148 (23.4)
67
81
CEA
0.353
≤ 5 ng/mL
547 (86.6)
287
260
> 5 ng/mL
85 (13.4)
40
45
Histological type
0.958
Well
190 (30.1)
98
92
Poor
442 (69.9)
229
213
Blood loss
0.034
≤ 400 mL
423 (66.9)
233
190
> 400 mL
209 (33.1)
94
115
Operative time
0.883
≤ 4 h
253 (40.0)
130
123
> 4 h
379 (60.0)
197
182
Postoperative chemotherapy
0.666
Absent
237 (37.5)
120
117
Present
395 (62.5)
207
188
Postoperative complications
0.488
Absent
551 (87.2)
288
263
Present
81 (12.8)
39
42
Severe complication
0.045
Absent
580 (91.8)
307
273
Present
52 (8.2)
20
32
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients
Variable
UnivariateP value
Multivariate
HR
95%CI
P value
Age (yr)
0.041
0.004
≤ 65
1
> 65
2.323
1.299-4.156
Sex
0.299
Male
Female
Resectability
< 0.001
0.018
R0
1
R1, R2
2.062
1.133-3.759
Tumor depth
< 0.001
T1, T2
T3, T4
Lymph node
< 0.001
N0
N1-3
Distant metastasis
< 0.001
< 0.001
M0
1
M1
10.505
6.540-16.874
Pathological stage
I
1
II
< 0.001
2.552
1.591-4.095
< 0.001
III
< 0.001
4.695
3.053-7.220
< 0.001
IV
< 0.001
10.505
6.540-16.874
< 0.001
WBC
0.002
≤ 11 × 109/L
> 11 × 109/L
ALB
< 0.001
≥ 35 g/L
< 35 g/L
PLT
< 0.001
≤ 300 × 109/L
> 300 × 109/L
CEA
< 0.001
0.004
≤ 5 ng/mL
1
> 5 ng/mL
1.457
1.126-1.883
Histological type
< 0.001
Well
Poor
Blood loss
< 0.001
≤ 400 mL
> 400 mL
Operative time
0.067
≤ 4 h
> 4 h
Postoperative chemotherapy
0.479
Absent
Present
Postoperative complications
< 0.001
0.002
Absent
1
Present
1.516
1.164-1.974
PNI
< 0.001
< 0.001
1
1
2
1.668
1.368-2.035
NLR
< 0.001
0.656
1
1
2
1.056
0.830-1.343
PLR
< 0.001
0.113
1
1
2
1.190
0.960-1.475
Propensity score
0.398
Table 4 Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for survival of gastric patients based on all the derived prognostic scores at the end of follow-up, or after 12, 36, or 60 mo
Item
All survival
12 mo
36 mo
60 mo
AUC
P value
AUC
P value
AUC
P value
AUC
P value
PNI
0.630
< 0.001
0.602
< 0.001
0.621
< 0.001
0.614
< 0.001
NLR
0.613
< 0.001
0.593
< 0.001
0.587
< 0.001
0.588
< 0.001
PLR
0.611
< 0.001
0.580
0.002
0.592
< 0.001
0.593
< 0.001
PLT
0.573
0.004
0.564
0.013
0.562
0.007
0.566
0.005
PNI + NLR
0.535
0.493
0.502
0.968
0.476
0.570
0.487
0.776
PNI + PLR
0.477
0.656
0.480
0.644
0.435
0.123
0.455
0.309
PNI + PLT
0.498
0.970
0.493
0.867
0.469
0.468
0.449
0.251
NLR + PLR
0.477
0.647
0.447
0.229
0.459
0.329
0.472
0.522
NLR + PLT
0.487
0.796
0.466
0.437
0.488
0.772
0.461
0.382
PLR + PLT
0.440
0.240
0.448
0.237
0.448
0.219
0.442
0.190
PNI + NLR + PLR
0.679
< 0.001
0.638
< 0.001
0.651
< 0.001
0.647
< 0.001
PNI + NLR + PLT
0.684
< 0.001
0.655
< 0.001
0.657
< 0.001
0.654
< 0.001
PNI + PLR + PLT
0.668
< 0.001
0.634
< 0.001
0.647
< 0.001
0.646
< 0.001
NLR + PLR + PLT
0.660
< 0.001
0.627
< 0.001
0.629
< 0.001
0.632
< 0.001
PNI + NLR + PLR + PLT
0.685
< 0.001
0.647
< 0.001
0.657
< 0.001
0.655
< 0.001
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors including Canton score
Variable
Univariate P value
Multivariate
HR
95%CI
P value
Age (yr)
0.041
0.051
≤ 65
1
> 65
1.238
0.999-1.536
Sex
0.299
Male
Female
Resectability
< 0.001
0.002
R0
1
R1, R2
1.567
1.204-2.040
Tumor depth
< 0.001
T1, T2
T3, T4
Lymph node
< 0.001
N0
N1-3
Distant metastasis
< 0.001
M0
M1
Pathological stage
0.234
I, II
III, IV
< 0.001
WBC
0.002
≤ 11× 109/L
> 11× 109/L
ALB
< 0.001
≥ 35 g/L
< 35 g/L
PLT
< 0.001
0.795
≤ 300 × 109/L
> 300 × 109/L
CEA
< 0.001
≤ 5 ng/mL
> 5 ng/mL
Histological type
< 0.001
Well
Poor
Blood loss
< 0.001
0.407
≤ 400 mL
> 400 mL
Operative time
0.067
≤ 4 h
> 4 h
Postoperative chemotherapy
0.479
Absent
Present
Postoperative complications
< 0.001
Absent
Present
PLR
< 0.001
0.524
PLR-L
PLR-H
Canton score
0
1
1
0.021
1.076
0.796-1.454
0.633
2
< 0.001
1.554
1.151-2.097
0.004
3
< 0.001
1.643
1.142-2.364
0.007
Table 6 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors including Canton score
Variable
UnivariateP value
Multivariate
HR
95%CI
P value
Resectability
< 0.001
0.002
R0
1
R1, R2
1.567
1.204-2.040
Canton score
0
1
1
0.021
1.076
0.796-1.454
0.633
2
< 0.001
1.554
1.151-2.097
0.004
3
< 0.001
1.643
1.142-2.364
0.007
Citation: Sun KY, Xu JB, Chen SL, Yuan YJ, Wu H, Peng JJ, Chen CQ, Guo P, Hao YT, He YL. Novel immunological and nutritional-based prognostic index for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5961-5971