Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 5961-5971
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5961
Table 1 The list of multiple immunological and nutritional-based prognostic indices for gastric cancer
Combined markerScore
Prognostic Nutritional Index
≥ 48.21
< 48.22
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio
≤ 1.831
> 1.832
Platelet-lymphocyte ratio
≤ 1401
> 1402
Canton score
PNI ≥ 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L0
PNI ≥ 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L1
PNI ≥ 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L1
PNI < 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L1
PNI ≥ 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L2
PNI < 48, NLR ≤ 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L2
PNI < 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT ≤ 3 × 1011/L2
PNI < 48, NLR > 1.83 and PLT > 3 × 1011/L3
Table 2 Relationship between clinicopathological factors, postoperative complications, and prognostic nutritional index
Variablen (%)PNI-HPNI-LP value
Age (yr)0.407
≤ 65445 (70.4)235210
> 65187 (29.6)9295
Sex0.958
Male413 (65.3)214199
Female219 (34.7)113106
Resectability< 0.001
0509 (80.5)285224
1, 2123 (19.5)4281
Tumor depth0.006
T1, T2126 (19.9)7947
T3, T4506 (80.1)248258
Lymph node0.015
N0193 (30.5)11479
N1-3439 (69.5)213226
Distant metastasis< 0.001
M0474 (75.0)266208
M1158 (25.0)6197
Pathological stage0.002
I, II207 (32.8)12582
III, IV425 (67.2)202223
WBC0.279
≤ 11 × 109/L597 (94.5)312285
> 11 × 109/L35 (5.5)1520
ALB< 0.001
≥ 35 g/L507 (80.2)325182
< 35 g/L125 (19.8)2123
PLT0.072
≤ 300 × 109/L484 (76.6)260224
> 300 × 109/L148 (23.4)6781
CEA0.353
≤ 5 ng/mL547 (86.6)287260
> 5 ng/mL85 (13.4)4045
Histological type0.958
Well190 (30.1)9892
Poor442 (69.9)229213
Blood loss0.034
≤ 400 mL423 (66.9)233190
> 400 mL209 (33.1)94115
Operative time0.883
≤ 4 h253 (40.0)130123
> 4 h379 (60.0)197182
Postoperative chemotherapy0.666
Absent237 (37.5)120117
Present395 (62.5)207188
Postoperative complications0.488
Absent551 (87.2)288263
Present81 (12.8)3942
Severe complication0.045
Absent580 (91.8)307273
Present52 (8.2)2032
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients
VariableUnivariateP valueMultivariate
HR95%CIP value
Age (yr)0.0410.004
≤ 651
> 652.3231.299-4.156
Sex0.299
Male
Female
Resectability< 0.0010.018
R01
R1, R22.0621.133-3.759
Tumor depth< 0.001
T1, T2
T3, T4
Lymph node< 0.001
N0
N1-3
Distant metastasis< 0.001< 0.001
M01
M110.5056.540-16.874
Pathological stage
I1
II< 0.0012.5521.591-4.095< 0.001
III< 0.0014.6953.053-7.220< 0.001
IV< 0.00110.5056.540-16.874< 0.001
WBC0.002
≤ 11 × 109/L
> 11 × 109/L
ALB< 0.001
≥ 35 g/L
< 35 g/L
PLT< 0.001
≤ 300 × 109/L
> 300 × 109/L
CEA< 0.0010.004
≤ 5 ng/mL1
> 5 ng/mL1.4571.126-1.883
Histological type< 0.001
Well
Poor
Blood loss< 0.001
≤ 400 mL
> 400 mL
Operative time0.067
≤ 4 h
> 4 h
Postoperative chemotherapy0.479
Absent
Present
Postoperative complications< 0.0010.002
Absent1
Present1.5161.164-1.974
PNI< 0.001< 0.001
11
21.6681.368-2.035
NLR< 0.0010.656
11
21.0560.830-1.343
PLR< 0.0010.113
11
21.1900.960-1.475
Propensity score0.398
Table 4 Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for survival of gastric patients based on all the derived prognostic scores at the end of follow-up, or after 12, 36, or 60 mo
ItemAll survival
12 mo
36 mo
60 mo
AUCP valueAUCP valueAUCP valueAUCP value
PNI0.630< 0.0010.602< 0.0010.621< 0.0010.614< 0.001
NLR0.613< 0.0010.593< 0.0010.587< 0.0010.588< 0.001
PLR0.611< 0.0010.5800.0020.592< 0.0010.593< 0.001
PLT0.5730.0040.5640.0130.5620.0070.5660.005
PNI + NLR0.5350.4930.5020.9680.4760.5700.4870.776
PNI + PLR0.4770.6560.4800.6440.4350.1230.4550.309
PNI + PLT0.4980.9700.4930.8670.4690.4680.4490.251
NLR + PLR0.4770.6470.4470.2290.4590.3290.4720.522
NLR + PLT0.4870.7960.4660.4370.4880.7720.4610.382
PLR + PLT0.4400.2400.4480.2370.4480.2190.4420.190
PNI + NLR + PLR0.679< 0.0010.638< 0.0010.651< 0.0010.647< 0.001
PNI + NLR + PLT0.684< 0.0010.655< 0.0010.657< 0.0010.654< 0.001
PNI + PLR + PLT0.668< 0.0010.634< 0.0010.647< 0.0010.646< 0.001
NLR + PLR + PLT0.660< 0.0010.627< 0.0010.629< 0.0010.632< 0.001
PNI + NLR + PLR + PLT0.685< 0.0010.647< 0.0010.657< 0.0010.655< 0.001
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors including Canton score
VariableUnivariate P valueMultivariate
HR95%CIP value
Age (yr)0.0410.051
≤ 651
> 651.2380.999-1.536
Sex0.299
Male
Female
Resectability< 0.0010.002
R01
R1, R21.5671.204-2.040
Tumor depth< 0.001
T1, T2
T3, T4
Lymph node< 0.001
N0
N1-3
Distant metastasis< 0.001
M0
M1
Pathological stage0.234
I, II
III, IV< 0.001
WBC0.002
≤ 11× 109/L
> 11× 109/L
ALB< 0.001
≥ 35 g/L
< 35 g/L
PLT< 0.0010.795
≤ 300 × 109/L
> 300 × 109/L
CEA< 0.001
≤ 5 ng/mL
> 5 ng/mL
Histological type< 0.001
Well
Poor
Blood loss< 0.0010.407
≤ 400 mL
> 400 mL
Operative time0.067
≤ 4 h
> 4 h
Postoperative chemotherapy0.479
Absent
Present
Postoperative complications< 0.001
Absent
Present
PLR< 0.0010.524
PLR-L
PLR-H
Canton score
01
10.0211.0760.796-1.4540.633
2< 0.0011.5541.151-2.0970.004
3< 0.0011.6431.142-2.3640.007
Table 6 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors including Canton score
VariableUnivariateP valueMultivariate
HR95%CIP value
Resectability< 0.0010.002
R01
R1, R21.5671.204-2.040
Canton score
01
10.0211.0760.796-1.4540.633
2< 0.0011.5541.151-2.0970.004
3< 0.0011.6431.142-2.3640.007