Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 5910-5917
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5910
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5910
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients diagnosed with anastomosis leakage after resection of mid to low rectal cancer (n = 79)
n (%) | Surgical method | n (%) | |
Age (yr), median | 59 | ||
Gender | Conventional | 3 (3.8) | |
Male | 55 (69.6) | Laparoscopic | 45 (57.0) |
Female | 24 (30.4) | Robotic | 28 (35.4) |
BMI (mean, kg/m2) | 24.18 | Conversion | 3 (3.8) |
ASA score | Anastomosis method | ||
I | 34 (43.0) | Hand-sewn | 10 (12.8) |
II | 43 (54.4) | Stapling | 68 (87.2) |
III | 2 (2.5) | Anastomosis type | |
Tumor stage | End-to-end | 70 (88.6) | |
0/I | 23 (29.1) | End-to-side | 5 (6.3) |
II | 24 (30.4) | Colonic J-pouch | 4 (5.1) |
III | 24 (30.4) | Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy | 19 (24.1) |
IV | 8 (10.1) | Transfusion | 13 (17.3) |
Table 2 Univariate analysis of differences between the sequelae and no sequelae groups (n = 73) n (%)
95%CI | ||||||
Sequelae1 | No sequelae | OR | Lower | Upper | P value | |
Age, median (yr) | 62 | 55.5 | 0.037 | |||
> 65 | 11 (37.9) | 14 (31.8) | 1.459 | 0.557 | 3.819 | 0.442 |
Gender | ||||||
Male | 21 (72.4) | 30 (68.2) | 1.148 | 0.411 | 3.212 | 0.792 |
BMI, mean | 23.99 | 24.25 | 0.748 | |||
ASA score | ||||||
I | 11 | 20 | ||||
II/III | 18 | 24 | 1.259 | 0.487 | 3.255 | 0.635 |
Operation time, mean (min) | 284.49 | 260.74 | 0.205 | |||
Ileostomy | 21 (72.4) | 20 (45.5) | 3.412 | 1.254 | 9.290 | 0.016 |
LNM, mean | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.698 | |||
RLN, mean | 22.1 | 23.6 | 0.681 | |||
Stage | ||||||
0/I/II | 22 (75.9) | 22 (50.0) | ||||
III/IV | 7 (24.1) | 22 (50.0) | 0.318 | 0.114 | 0.890 | 0.029 |
Tumor location, median (centimeters from AV) | 5 | 5.5 | 0.144 | |||
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy | 9 (31.0) | 8 (18.2) | 2.137 | 0.715 | 6.393 | 0.174 |
Surgical method | 0.080 | |||||
Conventional | 0 | 3 (6.9) | ||||
Laparoscopic | 14 (48.3) | 27 (61.4) | ||||
Robotic | 13 (44.8) | 14 (31.8) | ||||
Conversion | 2 (6.9) | 0 | ||||
Anastomosis | 0.726 | |||||
Hand-sewn | 3 (10.3) | 6 (13.6) | ||||
Stapling | 26 (89.7) | 38 (86.4) | ||||
Anastomosis type | 0.766 | |||||
End-to-end | 26 (89.7) | 39 (88.6) | ||||
End-to-side | 2 (6.9) | 2 (4.5) | ||||
Colonic J-pouch | 1 (3.4) | 3 (6.9) | ||||
Mechanical bowel preparation | ||||||
Yes | 20 (69.0) | 34 (77.3) | ||||
No | 9 (31.0) | 10 (22.7) | 0.784 | 0.281 | 2.187 | 0.642 |
Initial AL management | 0.512 | |||||
Conservative | 12 (41.4) | 20 (45.5) | ||||
PAD | 7 (24.1) | 9 (20.5) | ||||
Diversion only | 4 (13.8) | 10 (22.7) | ||||
Primary repair + diversion | 0 | 1 (2.3) | ||||
Surgical irrigation + drainage | 6 (20.7) | 4 (9.1) | ||||
Transfusion | 8 (27.6) | 4 (9.1) | 3.810 | 1.027 | 14.137 | 0.046 |
Leakage (d) | 5.7 | 4.2 | 0.054 | |||
Hospital stay (d) | 48.9 | 20.9 | 0.001 | |||
Days to start diet (d) | 6.3 | 5.7 | 0.665 | |||
Antibiotics use (d) | 25.3 | 15.0 | 0.001 | |||
ICU transfer | 3 (10.3) | 3 (6.9) | 1.212 | 0.251 | 5.852 | 0.811 |
Multi-organ failure | 3 (10.3) | 2 (4.3) | 2.538 | 0.398 | 16.204 | 0.325 |
Postoperative ileus | 5 (17.2) | 4 (8.7) | 2.197 | 0.536 | 8.935 | 0.276 |
Table 3 Univariate analysis of differences between the permanent stoma and no permanent stoma groups (n = 79) n (%)
95%CI | ||||||
PS | No PS | OR | Lower | Upper | P value | |
Age, median (yr) | 58 | 60 | 0.772 | |||
> 65 | 4 (28.6) | 25 (38.5) | 0.250 | 0.181 | 2.262 | 0.488 |
Gender | ||||||
Male | 10 (71.4) | 45 (69.2) | 1.111 | 0.311 | 3.971 | 0.871 |
BMI, mean | 24.29 | 24.16 | 0.893 | |||
ASA score | ||||||
I | 8 (57.1) | 26 (40.0) | ||||
II/III | 6 (42.9) | 39 (60.0) | 0.500 | 0.155 | 1.609 | 0.245 |
Surgical time, mean (min) | 274.79 | 269.63 | 0.827 | |||
Ileostomy | 11 (78.6) | 34 (52.3) | 3.343 | 0.853 | 13.107 | 0.083 |
LNM, mean | 2.21 | 1.06 | 0.299 | |||
RLN, mean | 20.57 | 23.11 | 0.561 | |||
Stage | ||||||
0/I/II | 9 (64.3) | 23 (58.5) | ||||
III/IV | 5 (35.7) | 23 (41.5) | 0.782 | 0.236 | 2.594 | 0.688 |
Tumor location, median (centimeters from AV) | 3 | 5 | 0.029 | |||
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy | 5 (35.7) | 14 (21.5) | 2.204 | 0.584 | 7.014 | 0.266 |
Surgical method | 0.438 | |||||
Conventional | 0 (0) | 3 (4.6) | ||||
Laparoscopic | 10 (71.4) | 35 (53.8) | ||||
Robotic | 3 (21.4) | 25 (38.5) | ||||
Conversion | 1 (7.1) | 2 (3.1) | ||||
Anastomosis | 0.545 | |||||
Hand-sewn | 1 (7.7) | 9 (13.8) | ||||
Stapling | 12 (92.3) | 56 (86.2) | ||||
Anastomosis type | 0.129 | |||||
End-to-end | 12 (85.7) | 58 (89.2) | ||||
End-to-side | 2 (14.3) | 3 (4.6) | ||||
Colonic J-pouch | 0 | 4 (6.2) | ||||
Mechanical bowel preparation | ||||||
Yes | 5 (35.7) | 17 (26.2) | ||||
No | 9 (64.3) | 48 (73.8) | 0.638 | 0.187 | 2.171 | 0.471 |
Initial AL management | 0.633 | |||||
Conservative | 4 (28.6) | 29 (44.6) | ||||
PAD | 4 (28.6) | 13 (20.0) | ||||
Diversion only | 2 (14.3) | 12 (18.5) | ||||
Primary repair and diversion | 0 | 1 (1.5) | ||||
Surgical irrigation and drainage | 3 (21.4) | 7 (10.8) | ||||
Re-anastomosis and diversion | 0 | 2 (3.1) | ||||
Hartmann’s procedure | 1 (7.1) | 1 (1.5) | ||||
Transfusion | 5 (35.7) | 10 (15.4) | 3.056 | 0.846 | 11.036 | 0.088 |
Leakage, mean (d) | 5.0 | 4.7 | 0.768 | |||
Hospital stay, mean (d) | 45.9 | 29.1 | 0.121 | |||
Days to start diet, mean (d) | 7.5 | 5.8 | 0.427 | |||
Antibiotics use, mean (d) | 26.8 | 17.5 | 0.018 | |||
ICU transfer | 4 (28.6) | 5 (7.7) | 4.800 | 1.098 | 20.990 | 0.037 |
Multi-organ failure | 3 (21.4) | 3 (4.6) | 5.636 | 1.005 | 31.602 | 0.049 |
Postoperative ileus | 1 (7.1) | 8 (12.3) | 0.548 | 0.063 | 4.773 | 0.586 |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the sequelae and no sequelae groups including variables selected on univariate analysis
95%CI | ||||
OR | Lower | Upper | P value | |
Age | 1.035 | 0.979 | 1.095 | 0.378 |
Ileostomy | 6.741 | 1.069 | 13.372 | 0.017 |
Stage (III/IV) | 0.292 | 0.079 | 1.077 | 0.064 |
Antibiotics use (d) | 1.016 | 0.954 | 1.085 | 0.613 |
Hospital stay (d) | 1.045 | 0.987 | 1.106 | 0.135 |
Transfusion | 5.760 | 0.787 | 42.138 | 0.085 |
Table 5 Multivariate analysis of the permanent stoma and no permanent stoma groups with factors selected on univariate analysis
95%CI | ||||
OR | Lower | Upper | P value | |
Tumor location | 0.751 | 0.567 | 0.994 | 0.045 |
Antibiotic use | 1.036 | 0.990 | 1.084 | 0.125 |
ICU transfer | 4.184 | 0.277 | 63.162 | 0.301 |
Multi-organ failure | 0.685 | 0.027 | 17.426 | 0.528 |
- Citation: Ji WB, Kwak JM, Kim J, Um JW, Kim SH. Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5910-5917
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i19/5910.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5910