Ji WB, Kwak JM, Kim J, Um JW, Kim SH. Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5910-5917 [PMID: 26019455 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5910]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jung Myun Kwak, MD, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, 73, Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-705, South Korea. jmkwak@korea.ac.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 3 Univariate analysis of differences between the permanent stoma and no permanent stoma groups (n = 79) n (%)
95%CI
PS
No PS
OR
Lower
Upper
P value
Age, median (yr)
58
60
0.772
> 65
4 (28.6)
25 (38.5)
0.250
0.181
2.262
0.488
Gender
Male
10 (71.4)
45 (69.2)
1.111
0.311
3.971
0.871
BMI, mean
24.29
24.16
0.893
ASA score
I
8 (57.1)
26 (40.0)
II/III
6 (42.9)
39 (60.0)
0.500
0.155
1.609
0.245
Surgical time, mean (min)
274.79
269.63
0.827
Ileostomy
11 (78.6)
34 (52.3)
3.343
0.853
13.107
0.083
LNM, mean
2.21
1.06
0.299
RLN, mean
20.57
23.11
0.561
Stage
0/I/II
9 (64.3)
23 (58.5)
III/IV
5 (35.7)
23 (41.5)
0.782
0.236
2.594
0.688
Tumor location, median (centimeters from AV)
3
5
0.029
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
5 (35.7)
14 (21.5)
2.204
0.584
7.014
0.266
Surgical method
0.438
Conventional
0 (0)
3 (4.6)
Laparoscopic
10 (71.4)
35 (53.8)
Robotic
3 (21.4)
25 (38.5)
Conversion
1 (7.1)
2 (3.1)
Anastomosis
0.545
Hand-sewn
1 (7.7)
9 (13.8)
Stapling
12 (92.3)
56 (86.2)
Anastomosis type
0.129
End-to-end
12 (85.7)
58 (89.2)
End-to-side
2 (14.3)
3 (4.6)
Colonic J-pouch
0
4 (6.2)
Mechanical bowel preparation
Yes
5 (35.7)
17 (26.2)
No
9 (64.3)
48 (73.8)
0.638
0.187
2.171
0.471
Initial AL management
0.633
Conservative
4 (28.6)
29 (44.6)
PAD
4 (28.6)
13 (20.0)
Diversion only
2 (14.3)
12 (18.5)
Primary repair and diversion
0
1 (1.5)
Surgical irrigation and drainage
3 (21.4)
7 (10.8)
Re-anastomosis and diversion
0
2 (3.1)
Hartmann’s procedure
1 (7.1)
1 (1.5)
Transfusion
5 (35.7)
10 (15.4)
3.056
0.846
11.036
0.088
Leakage, mean (d)
5.0
4.7
0.768
Hospital stay, mean (d)
45.9
29.1
0.121
Days to start diet, mean (d)
7.5
5.8
0.427
Antibiotics use, mean (d)
26.8
17.5
0.018
ICU transfer
4 (28.6)
5 (7.7)
4.800
1.098
20.990
0.037
Multi-organ failure
3 (21.4)
3 (4.6)
5.636
1.005
31.602
0.049
Postoperative ileus
1 (7.1)
8 (12.3)
0.548
0.063
4.773
0.586
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the sequelae and no sequelae groups including variables selected on univariate analysis
95%CI
OR
Lower
Upper
P value
Age
1.035
0.979
1.095
0.378
Ileostomy
6.741
1.069
13.372
0.017
Stage (III/IV)
0.292
0.079
1.077
0.064
Antibiotics use (d)
1.016
0.954
1.085
0.613
Hospital stay (d)
1.045
0.987
1.106
0.135
Transfusion
5.760
0.787
42.138
0.085
Table 5 Multivariate analysis of the permanent stoma and no permanent stoma groups with factors selected on univariate analysis
95%CI
OR
Lower
Upper
P value
Tumor location
0.751
0.567
0.994
0.045
Antibiotic use
1.036
0.990
1.084
0.125
ICU transfer
4.184
0.277
63.162
0.301
Multi-organ failure
0.685
0.027
17.426
0.528
Citation: Ji WB, Kwak JM, Kim J, Um JW, Kim SH. Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(19): 5910-5917