Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2015; 21(19): 5805-5812
Published online May 21, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i19.5805
Table 1 Comparison of the clinical characteristics of brain metastasis from esophageal carcinoma patients in different countries n (%)
Clinical characteristicJapan[19]United States[20]China[18]
n = 36n = 27n = 31
2003-20101993-20012000-2012
Pathology
Squamous cell carcinoma23 (64)2 (7)26 (83.8)
Adenocarcinoma5 (14)22 (82)3 (9.7)
Small cell carcinoma5 (14)02 (6.5)
Other3 (8)3 (11)0
RPA class
I3 (8)2 (7)9 (29)
II11 (31)21 (78)19 (61.3)
III22 (61)4 (15)3 (9.7)
Number of BMEC lesions
Single19 (53)13 (48)18 (58.1)
Multiple17 (47)14 (52)13 (41.9)
Location of BMEC
Cerebral hemisphere25 (69)5 (18)47 (75.8)
Cerebellum8 (22)15 (24.2)
Other3 (8)22 (82)
Other metastatic sites
Yes25 (69)19 (70)16 (51.6)
No11 (31)8 (30)15 (48.4)
Treatment for BMEC
Chemotherapy alone3 (8)03 (9.6)
RT alone9 (25)15 (56)9 (29)
Surgery alone12 (33)6 (22)
Surgery + RT5 (14)6 (22)2 (6.5)
Surgery + chemotherapy1 (3)
Chemotherapy + RT1 (3)11 (35.5)
Surgery + RT + chemotherapy04 (12.9)
Palliative care5 (14)2 (6.5)
Table 2 Outcomes of different treatment methods
StudyNumber of patientsTreatmentMedian survival (mo)Factors influencing prognosis
Ogawa et al[19]12SR + WBRT9.6Treatment plan
24WBRT1.8KPS score
Total36 (MOS)3.9
Weinberg et al[20]4SR + WBRT9.6Liver metastasis
6SR3.8RPA class
15WBRT3.9
2SRT2.5
Total27 (MOS)3.8
Wadhwa et al[23]20 (MOS)10.5None
Kanemoto et al[27]6WBRT1.6None
2SR + WBRT4.1
2SRT4.0
1SRS18.2
1None0.4
Total12 (MOS)2.1
Yoshida[36]3SR + WBRT65.5None
7SR17.7
4SRT9.5
3WBRT27.1
(No MOS)