Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2014; 20(5): 1155-1164
Published online Feb 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1155
Published online Feb 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1155
Table 1 A comparison of 2 capsule endoscopy scoring indices for quantification of mucosal inflammation
Parameter | Lewis score[8] | CECDAI[80] | |||
Number/quality | Longitudinal extent | Descriptors | Parameter | Descriptors | |
Villous appearance | Normal/edematous | Short segment/long segment/whole tertile | Single/patchy/diffuse | Inflammation score | None to large ulcer (> 2 cm) |
Ulceration | Non/single/few/multiple | Short segment/long segment/whole tertile | < 25%, 25%-50%, > 50% | Extent of disease | No disease to diffuse (3 segments) |
Stricture | Non/single/few/multiple | Ulcerated/non-ulcerated | Traversed/non-traversed | Stricture score | None to complete obstruction |
Small bowel segmentation | Tertiles (strictures for the entire length of the examination) | Proximal to distal small bowel | |||
Score | < 135: Normal or clinically insignificant inflammation | 0 (normal examination)-26 (severe inflammation) | |||
135-790: Mild inflammation | |||||
790: Moderate to severe. |
Table 2 Key studies evaluating the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy for Crohn’s disease
Modality | Ref. | Number of patients | Diagnostic yield of VCE | Diagnostic yield of the compared modality | IY | P value |
CTE | Eliakim et al[81] | 35 | 77% | 20% | 47% | < 0.05 |
Hara et al[82] | 17 | 71% | 53% | 18% | NA | |
Voderholzer et al[83] | 41 | 61% | 49% (CT enteroclysis) | 12% | < 0.04 | |
Solem et al[84] | 40 | 83% | 83% | 0 | NS | |
MRE | Albert et al[85] | 27 | 93% | 78% | 15% | NS |
Crook et al[22] | 19 | 93% | 71% | 18% | NS | |
Jensen et al[20] | 93 | 100% | 86% | 14% | NS | |
Ileocolonoscopy | Hara et al[82] | 17 | 71% | 65% | 6% | NS |
Solem et al[84] | 40 | 83% | 74% | 9% | NS | |
Leighton et al[86] | 80 | 55% | 25% | 30% | NA |
Table 3 Key studies describing the role of videocapsule endoscopy in established Crohn’s disease
Indication | Ref. | n | Inclusion criteria | Diagnostic criteria | Results |
Mucosal healing | Efthimyou et al[28] | 40 | Patients with active CD (CDAI > 150) who responded to anti-inflammatory treatment, VCE was performed before and after treatment | Number of aphthous ulcers/large ulcers/length of involved segment | Only number of large ulcers correlated with response (8.3 ± 1.4 and 5/0.8, 95%CI: 0.8-5.9, P < 0.01) |
Postoperative recurrence | Bourreille et al[31] | 31 | CD with ileocolonic anastomosis | Rutgeerts score ≥ 1 | VCE-21/31 (68%), IC-19/31 (61%) |
Pons Beltrán et al[32] | 24 | CD with ileocolonic anastomosis | Rutgeerts score ≥ 2 | VCE-14/22 (55%), IC-6/24 (25%) | |
Unexplained symptoms | Dubcenco et al[34] | 28 | Active CD patients | ≥ 3 ulcers | VCE-23 (82%), IC-14 50%, barium radiography-9 (32%) |
Dussault et al[35] | 25 | Active CD patients with unexplained symptoms | Severity graded by number and appearance of ulcers and presence of stenosis | Active SB inflammation: 11/25 (44%) |
Table 4 Key studies describing the role of videocapsule endoscopy in unclassified Inflammatory bowel disease pouchitis and ulcerative colitis
Ref. | Indication | n | Definition of CD | Results n (%) | |
IBD-U | Mehdizadeh et al[41] | IBDU | 6 | > 3 ulcerations-diagnostic of CD, 1-2 ulcerations-suggestive of CD | 1 (17) |
SB findings | |||||
Maonoury et al[42] | IBDU | 30 | > 3 ulcerations-diagnostic of CD, 1-2 ulcerations-suggestive of CD | 5 (17), CD | |
Cohen et al[43] | IBDU | 2 | NA | 1 (50), CD | |
s/p IPAA | Mow et al[40] | Isolated colitis | 6 | > 3 ulcerations-diagnostic of CD, 1-2 ulcerations-suggestive of CD | 3 (50)-definite CD, 2 (20), possible CD |
Mehdizadeh et al[41] | Persistent symptoms after IPAA | 21 | > 3 ulcerations-diagnostic of CD, 1-2 ulcerations-suggestive of CD | 7 (33%) | |
SB findings | |||||
Calabrese et al[47] | Chronic pouchitis after IPAA | 15 | NA | Gastric or SB lesions, 15 (100) | |
Ulcerative colitis | Mow et al[40] | Isolated colitis | 12 | > 3 ulcerations-diagnostic of CD, 1-2 ulcerations-suggestive of CD | 3 (25)-definite CD, 3 (25), possible CD |
Mehdizadeh et al[41] | Treatment-resistant UC | 22 | > 3 ulcerations-diagnostic of CD, 1-2 ulcerations-suggestive of CD | 2 (9), SB findings | |
Cohen et al[43] | UC | 5 | NA | 4 (80), CD | |
Higurashi et al[44] | UC | 23 | Lewis score | 13 (56.5), small bowel lesions | |
9 (39), Lewis score > 135 |
Table 5 Potential future technological developments in capsule endoscopy relevant to inflammatory bowel disease
- Citation: Kopylov U, Seidman EG. Role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(5): 1155-1164
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i5/1155.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1155