Damin DC, Lazzaron AR. Evolving treatment strategies for colorectal cancer: A critical review of current therapeutic options. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(4): 877-887 [PMID: 24574762 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.877]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Daniel C Damin, MD, PhD, Division of Coloproctology, Department of Surgery, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Sala 600, Porto Alegre, RS 90035-903, Brazil. damin@terra.com.br
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Topic Highlight
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Carcinoma in situ: intraepithelial or invasion of lamina propria
T1
Tumor invades submucosa
T2
Tumor invades muscularis propria
T3
Tumor invades subserosa or into non-peritonealized pericolic or perirectal tissues
T4
Tumor directly invades other organs or structures and/or perforates visceral peritoneum
T4a
Tumor perforates visceral peritoneum
T4b
Tumor directly invades other organs or structures
Nx
Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0
No regional lymph node metastasis
N1
Metastasis in 1-3 regional lymph nodes
N1a
Metastasis in 1 regional lymph node
N1b
Metastasis in 2-3 regional lymph nodes
N1c
Tumor deposit(s), i.e., satellites, in the subserosa, or in non-peritonealized pericolic or perirectal soft tissue without regional lymph node metastasis
N2
Metastasis in 4 or more regional lymph nodes
N2a
Metastasis in 4-6 regional lymph nodes
N2b
Metastasis in 7 or more regional lymph nodes
M0
No distant metastasis
M1
Distant metastasis
M1a
Metastasis confined to one organ [liver, lung, ovary, non-regional lymph node(s)]
M1b
Metastasis in more than one organ or the peritoneum
Arm 1 (421 patients): preoperative CHRT: 50.4 Gy/28 fractions/5 fractions weekly and fluorouracil (continuous infusion) in first and fifth week of RT. TME after 6 wk Additional 4 cycles of FU every 4 wk Arm 2 (402 patients): postoperative CHRT (same as in Arm 1 except a 5.4 Gy boost in RT)
5 yr of follow-up Arm 1: 6.0% Arm 2: 13% P = 0.006
5-yr survival rate Arm 1: 76.0% Arm 2: 74.0% P = 0.80
Arm 1 (155 patients): preoperative RT (5 Gy × 5 d) followed by TME at 7 d after RT Arm 2 (157 patients): preoperative RT (45 Gy/25 fractions/5 wk) + 2 cycles of chemotherapy on weeks 1 and 5 of RT followed by TME 4-6 wk later. The cycle consisted of leucovorin + fluorouracil both administered as rapid infusion on 5 consecutive days
4 yr of follow-up Arm 1: 9% Arm 2: 14.2% P = 0.170
4-yr survival rate Arm 1: 67.2% Arm 2: 66.2% P = 0.960
Arm 1 (674 patients): short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy/5 fractions) followed by surgery. Arm 2 (676 patients): initial surgery with selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions plus 5-fluorouracil) restricted to patients with involvement of the circumferential resection margin.
3 yr of follow-up Arm 1: 4.0% Arm 2: 10.6% P < 0. 01
Estimated 5-yr survival rate Arm 1: 70.3% Arm 2: 67.9% P = 0.40
Table 4 Locoregional recurrence in patients with complete clinical response who did not proceed to rectal resection n (%)
Citation: Damin DC, Lazzaron AR. Evolving treatment strategies for colorectal cancer: A critical review of current therapeutic options. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(4): 877-887