Ko S, Jo H, Yun S, Park E, Kim S, Seo HI. Comparative analysis of radiofrequency ablation and resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(2): 525-531 [PMID: 24574721 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.525]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Hyung-Il Seo, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University, 305 Gudeok-Ro, Seo-Gu, Busan, 602-739, South Korea. seohi71@hanmail.net
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2014; 20(2): 525-531 Published online Jan 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.525
Table 1 Types of surgery for colorectal liver metastasis
Type of surgery
n (%)
Major resection
Right hemihepatectomy
5 (41.7)
Minor resection
Segmentectomy
6 (50.0)
Left lateral sectionectomy
1 (8.3)
Total
12
Table 2 Summary of patient information
No.
Age (yr)
Sex
Comorbidity
Treatment modality
Location
Timing of metastasis
Recurrence
Results
1
51
M
RFA
Colon
Meta
Yes
S
2
60
M
RFA
Colon
Meta
Yes
D
3
69
M
Resection
Colon
Meta
Yes
D
4
76
M
DM, HT
Resection
Rectum
Meta
Yes
D
5
62
M
RFA
Colon
Syn
No
S
6
61
M
DM
RFA
Rectum
Meta
Yes
D
7
70
F
Resection
Colon
Meta
Yes
S
8
70
M
Resection
Rectum
Meta
No
S
9
71
F
Resection
Rectum
Meta
Yes
S
10
69
F
DM, HT
Resection
Colon
Syn
Yes
S
11
74
F
Resection
Colon
Syn
No
S
12
71
M
Resection
Colon
Meta
Yes
S
13
82
M
Resection
Rectum
Meta
Yes
D
14
58
F
RFA
Colon
Meta
No
S
15
60
M
RFA
Colon
Syn
Yes
D
16
56
F
RFA
Colon
Meta
Yes
S
17
56
M
RFA
Colon
Meta
Yes
S
18
54
F
RFA
Colon
Meta
Yes
D
19
52
F
RFA
Rectum
Meta
No
S
20
60
M
RFA
Colon
Meta
Yes
D
21
55
M
RFA
Rectum
Meta
Yes
D
22
75
M
Resection
Colon
Syn
Yes
D
23
54
F
RFA
Rectum
Meta
Yes
D
24
63
F
RFA
Colon
Syn
Yes
D
25
66
M
Resection
Rectum
Syn
Yes
S
26
56
F
RFA
Rectum
Meta
Yes
D
27
67
M
Resection
Colon
Meta
Yes
D
28
58
M
RFA
Rectum
Syn
No
S
29
71
M
Resection
Colon
Meta
Yes
S
Table 3 Summary of pathological findings
No.
Metastatic tumor size (cm)
Diff
T
N
M
LNR
LV
PN
1
2.5
Mod
3
2
0
0.23
Pos
Pos
2
1.6
Mod
3
2
0
0.17
Pos
Pos
3
4
Mod
4
2
0
0.37
Pos
Pos
4
4.2
Mod
4
1
0
0.43
Pos
Pos
5
3.2
Mod
3
1
1
0.07
Pos
Neg
6
4.2
Mod
2
2
0
0.25
Pos
Pos
7
4
Mod
3
0
1
0
Pos
Pos
8
2.8
Mod
4
0
0
0
Pos
Pos
9
4.4
Mod
1
2
0
0.06
Neg
Neg
10
4.9
Well
3
1
1
0.03
Pos
Neg
11
2.8
Mod
3
0
0
0
Neg
Pos
12
2.3
Mod
4
1
0
0.08
Neg
Neg
13
3.2
Mod
4
2
1
0.33
Neg
Pos
14
1.2
Mod
3
2
0
0.14
Pos
Pos
15
0.9
Poor
3
2
0
0.12
Pos
Pos
16
1.7
Poor
3
1
0
0.04
Pos
Pos
17
2
Mod
3
1
0
0.03
Neg
Neg
18
1
Mod
3
2
0
0.34
Pos
Pos
19
2.5
Mod
4
0
0
0
Neg
Neg
20
2
Mod
3
1
0
0.14
Pos
Pos
21
1.6
Mod
3
1
0
0.08
Pos
Pos
22
1
Mod
3
1
0
0.04
Pos
Pos
23
3.8
Mod
2
0
0
0
Neg
Neg
24
3.7
Mod
3
0
1
0
Neg
Neg
25
1
Mod
3
0
0
0
Neg
Neg
26
3.6
Mod
4
2
1
0.58
Neg
Pos
27
1.2
Mod
3
0
0
0
Pos
Pos
28
0.8
Mod
4
1
1
0.03
Neg
Neg
29
1.3
Mod
3
0
0
0
Neg
Neg
Table 4 Clinicopathological data of colorectal liver metastasis n (%)
RFA (n = 17)
Resection (n = 12)
P-value
Sex
Male
7 (41)
4 (33)
0.49
Female
10 (59)
8 (67)
Age (yr)
61.35 ± 8.33
67.50 ± 7.44
0.07
Age (yr)
≤ 65
12 (71)
4 (33)
0.07
> 65
5 (29)
8 (67)
Timing of metastasis
Synchronous
5 (29)
3 (25)
1.00
Metachronous
12 (71)
9 (75)
Primary site
Colon
10 (59)
8 (67)
0.72
Rectum
7 (41)
4 (33)
T stage
I-III
13 (76)
8 (67)
0.68
IV
4 (24)
4 (33)
Lymphovascular
Positive
8 (47)
8 (67)
0.45
Invasion
Negative
9 (53)
4 (33)
Perineural invasion
Positive
10 (59)
7 (58)
1.00
Negative
7 (41)
5 (42)
Lymph node metastasis
Positive
11 (65)
9 (75)
0.69
Negative
6 (35)
3 (25)
Size of metastasis (cm)
2.02 ± 1.17
3.59 ± 0.81
0.03
Size of metastasis
≤ 3 cm
13 (76)
5 (42)
0.07
> 3 cm
4 (24)
7 (58)
Recurrence
Yes
14 (82)
9 (75)
0.67
No
3 (18)
3 (25)
Table 5 Univariate analysis of 5-year overall survival
RFA (n = 17)
Resection (n = 12)
P-value
3-yr
5-yr
3-yr
5-yr
Sex
Female
42.9%
42.9%
100%
100%
0.083%
Male
60.0%
30.0%
50.0%
50.0%
0.925%
Age (yr)
≤ 65
58.3%
38.9%
50.0%
50.0%
0.848%
> 65
40.0%
40.0%
75.0%
75.0%
0.187%
Primary
1-3
50.0%
33.3%
75.0%
75.0%
0.194%
T stage
4
66.7%
66.7%
50.0%
50.0%
0.847%
Timing of
Synchronous
33.3%
33.3%
100%
100%
0.093%
Metastasis
Metachronous
63.6%
42.4%
55.6%
55.6%
0.975%
Preoperative chemotherapy
No
50.0%
50.0
66.7
66.7
0.410
Yes
54.5%
36.4%
66.7%
66.7%
0.495%
Primary site
Colon
50.0%
37.5%
75.0%
75.0%
0.202%
Rectum
57.1%
38.1%
50.0%
50.0%
0.992%
Metastatic
Negative Positive
50.0%
50.0%
100%
100%
0.175%
Lymph node
54.5%
32.7%
55.6%
55.6%
0.502%
Lymphovascular invasion
Negative
55.6%
55.6%
100%
100%
0.140%
Positive
50.0%
25.0%
50.0%
50.0%
0.638%
Perineural invasion
Negative Positive
71.4%
71.4%
100%
100%
0.214%
40.0%
20.0%
42.9%
42.9%
0.515%
Primary
≤ 3 cm
69.2%
49.50%
80.0%
80.0%
0.464%
Tumor size
> 3 cm
0.0%
0.0%
57.1%
57.1%
0.005%
Postoperative chemotherapy
No
20.0%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.929%
Yes
66.7%
47.6%
80.0%
80.0%
0.341%
Table 6 Univariate analysis of 5-year disease-free survival
RFA (n = 17)
Resection (n = 12)
P-value
3-yr
5-yr
3-yr
5-yr
Sex
Female
28.6%
28.6%
50.0%
50.0%
0.350
Male
10.0%
10.0%
50.0%
33.3%
0.039
Age (yr)
≤ 65
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
25.0%
0.449
> 65
0.0%
0.0%
46.9%
46.9%
0.012
Primary
I-III
7.1%
7.1%
50.0%
25.0%
0.023
T Stage
IV
66.7%
66.7%
50.0%
50.0%
0.702
Timing of
Synchronous
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
66.7%
0.201
Metastasis
Metachronous
18.2%
18.2%
41.7%
20.8%
0.172
Preoperative chemotherapy
No
16.7%
16.7%
53.3%
53.3%
0.112
Yes
18.2%
18.2%
33.3%
0.0%
0.617
Primary site
Colon
10.0%
10.0%
50.0%
25.0%
0.048
Rectum
28.6%
28.6%
37.5%
37.5%
0.385
Metastatic
Negative
16.7%
16.7%
100.0%
100.0%
0.037
Lymph node
Positive
18.2%
18.2%
29.6%
14.8%
0.325
Lymphovascular invasion
Negative
22.2%
22.2%
50.0%
50.0%
0.137
Positive
12.5%
12.5%
50.0%
33.3%
0.197
Perineural invasion
Negative
28.6%
28.6%
40.0%
40.0%
0.423
Positive
10.0%
10.0%
57.1%
28.6%
0.074
Primary
≤ 3 cm
23.1%
23.1%
60.0%
30.0%
0.204
Tumor size
> 3 cm
0.0%
0.0%
38.1%
38.1%
0.013
Postoperative chemotherapy
No
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
50.0%
0.151
Yes
25.0%
25.0%
50.0%
33.3%
0.235
Citation: Ko S, Jo H, Yun S, Park E, Kim S, Seo HI. Comparative analysis of radiofrequency ablation and resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(2): 525-531