Clinical Articles
Copyright ©The Author(s) 1996.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 25, 1996; 2(2): 89-91
Published online Jun 25, 1996. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v2.i2.89
Table 1 Comparison of frequency of increase of sTNF-RI and alpha-fetoprotein
Hepatoma stagenx-± sPercentage of increased sTNF-RI (n)Percentage of increased AFP (n)
I-IV832.62 ± 0.7989.16% (74)54.22% (45)
I-II241.74 ± 0.4166.67% (16)45.83% (11)
III-IV592.97 ± 0.4398.30% (58)57.63% (34)
Control610.93 ± 0.29
Table 2 Correlations between sTNF-RI and other parameters
r
Hemoglobin-0.11
Total white blood cell count0.43b
Albumin-0.71b
Globulin0.32a
Alkaline phosphatase0.59b
Gamma-glutamyltransferase0.05
Table 3 Mean serum levels of sTNF-RI in 25 hepatoma patients before and after chemotherapy and their relationship to clinical response
Patient no.StageChemotherapyClinical responsesTNF-RI
BeforeAfter
1IVAPR3.253.07
2IVAPR3.383.11
3IVAPR3.152.83
4IVVD2.953.36
5IIIAD2.332.91
6IIIAD2.973.38
7IVAPR2.652.37
8IIIAD2.362.84
9IIIAD2.382.74
10IVAD2.793.16
11IIIAPR2.622.53
12IVAD3.183.46
13IVAD3.073.23
14IVAD3.523.93
15IVVD3.443.51
16IVAD3.273.67
17IVAPR2.962.73
18IIIACR2.782.11
19IIIAPR2.742.53
20IVACR3.252.87
21IVVD2.793.43
22IVVD3.544.18
23IIIVD2.623.11
24IVVD2.883.22
25IVVD3.854.63
x-± sPatients in remission (n = 9)2.98 ± 0.292.67 ± 0.34
Patients showing deterioration (n = 16)2.99 ± 0.533.39 ± 0.43