Original Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2013; 19(29): 4679-4688
Published online Aug 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4679
Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics
Patient characteristicsStatistic
Age (yr)54 (37-74)
Gender (male/female)39/11
Etiology
HBV/HCV/non-viral39/6/5
Child-Pugh classification
A5/A6/B717/25/8
Staging
BCLC staging C50
Modified UICC (III/IVa/IVb)9/31/10
Tumor type
Nodular/massive/infiltrative3/4/43
Portal vein thrombosis
Vp2/Vp3/Vp47/13/30
Maximal tumor size (cm)
< 10/≥ 1026/24
Tumor volume (cm3)1492.7 (26.1-2746.6)
Extrahepatic metastases16
Previous treatment
TACL/TACL + RFA/TACL + ERT19/3/2
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)10.87 (0.34-1.99)
PT (INR)11.14 (0.94-1.38)
ALT (IU/L)137 (15-345)
Platelet count (× 103/mL)1133 (50-326)
AFP (ng/mL)13084.15 (7.94-426100)
PIVKA-II (mAU/mL)11190 (16-12000)
Table 2 Tumor responses to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy treatment
Response after two cyclesBest response during HAICOverall response after HAICIntra-hepatic tumor response
CR2%6%6%6%
PR20%26%10%26%
SD52%44%12%52%
PD26%24%72%16%
Objective response22%32%16%32%
Disease control rate74%76%28%84%
Table 3 Pre-treatment prognostic factors for survival in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy treatment
VariablesUnivariateMultivariate1
HR (95%CI)HR (95%CI)P-value
Age (< 60/≥ 60 yr)0.991 (0.514-1.912)
Gender (male/female)1.453 (0.687-3.076)
Maximal tumor size (< 10/≥ 10 cm)1.693 (0.894-3.204)
Tumor volume (< 400/≥ 400 cm3)2.509 (1.289-4.885)2.520 (1.252-5.072)0.01
Child-Pugh score (5/> 5)2.099 (1.038-4.244)1.812 (0.878-3.738)0.108
Stage
mUICC stage (III/IV)1.198 (0.502-2.863)
AJCC (III/IV)2.133 (1.085-4.193)1.803 (0.895-3.634)0.099
Extrahepatic metastases1.508 (0.772-2.948)
Pre-HAIC treatment0.939 (0.503-1.755)
Portal vein thrombosis (Vp4 vs non-Vp4)1.603 (0.829-3.100)
AFP level (< 200/≥ 200 ng/mL)1.707 (0.845-3.448)
PIVKA-II (< 40/≥ 40 mAU/mL)2.860 (1.110-7.368)3.121 (1.177-8.274)0.022
Table 4 Post-treatment prognostic factors for survival in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy treatment
VariablesUnivariateMultivariate1
HR (95%CI)Adjusted HR (95%CI)P-value2
After 2nd HAIC cycleObjective response
Responder1
Non-responder2.382 (0.995-5.704)
Disease control
Control group1
Progressive group3.708 (1.801-7.634)3.850 (1.768-8.381)0.001
PVTT response
Response1
Non-response2.531 (1.164-5.505)3.398 (1.529-7.552)0.003
AFP reduction
≥ 50%1
< 50%3.242 (1.297-8.102)3.031 (1.194-7.691)0.02
PIVKA-II reduction
≥ 50%1
< 50%3.164 (1.469-6.818)2.254 (0.989-5.137)0.053
Response during HAICBest tumor response
Objective response
Responder1
Non-responder4.747 (2.111-10.672)4.445 (1.893-10.439)0.001
Tumor control
Control group1
Progressive group3.274 (1.594-6.724)3.137 (1.494-6.591)0.003
Intra-hepatic tumor response
Objective response
Responder1
Non-responder4.747 (2.111-10.672)4.445 (1.893-10.439)0.001
Tumor control
Control group1
Progressive group3.032 (1.348-6.821)3.009 (1.302-6.958)0.01
PVTT response
Response1
Non-response9.587 (2.879-31.927)8.188 (2.403-27.898)0.001
Combination therapy
Yes1
No2.367 (1.218-4.601)2.164 (1.082-4.328)0.029
Table 5 Adverse events related to treatment
Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4
Hematological
Leukopenia26%38%8%0%
Neutropenia10%26%30%12%
Anemia26%48%26%0%
Thrombocytopenia30%18%44%0%
Non-hematological
Total bilirubin30%28%10%0%
AST20%36%38%6%
ALT48%12%16%2%
Table 6 Causes of death
Patient number (n = 37)
Disease progression21
Hepatic dysfunction6
Variceal bleeding5
Infection3
Unknown2