Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2012; 18(6): 541-545
Published online Feb 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i6.541
Published online Feb 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i6.541
Date 1 | Date 2 | Date 3 | |
Time to peak | |||
Responder (CR, PR) | |||
mean ± SD | 9.1 ± 2.9 | 12.1 ± 2.3 | 14.6 ± 3.9 |
95% CI | 7.3-10.8 | 10.7-13.6 | 12.2-17.0 |
Non-responder (SD1,PD) | |||
mean ± SD | 14.8 ± 3.7 | 16.7 ± 2.8 | 16.4 ± 2.6 |
95% CI | 12.8-16.7 | 15.2-18.2 | 15.0-17.7 |
P value compared responder with non-responder | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | NS |
Time to peak quotient | |||
Responder (CR, PR) | |||
mean ± SD | 57.5 ± 11.8 | 80.5 ± 5.4 | 93.7 ± 9.2 |
95% CI | 50.3-64.6 | 77.2-83.7 | 88.2-99.2 |
Non-responder (SD1, PD) | |||
mean ± SD | 98.7 ± 12.6 | 100.6 ± 13.3 | 96.9 ± 9.7 |
95% CI | 92.2-105.2 | 93.8-107.5 | 91.9-101.9 |
P value compared responder with non-responder | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | NS |
- Citation: Schirin-Sokhan R, Winograd R, Roderburg C, Bubenzer J, Ó NCD, Guggenberger D, Hecker H, Trautwein C, Tischendorf JJW. Response evaluation of chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer by contrast enhanced ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(6): 541-545
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i6/541.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i6.541