Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2012; 18(48): 7225-7233
Published online Dec 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7225
Published online Dec 28, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7225
Fibrosis stage (n) | ADC value (×10-3 mm2/s), mean (SD), 95%CI | TLV (cm3), mean (SD), 95%CI | ||
b = 300 s/mm2 | b = 500 s/mm2 | b = 800 s/mm2 | ||
0 (16) | 1.96 (0.19), 1.83-2.09 | 1.67 (0.21), 1.53-1.81 | 1.39 (0.15), 1.29-1.50 | 641.08 (99.22), 574.42-707.74 |
1 (11) | 1.81 (0.19), 1.69-1.93 | 1.66 (0.23), 1.51-1.81 | 1.37 (0.11), 1.30-1.44 | 671.62 (106.12), 600.33-742.91 |
2 (13) | 1.69 (0.17)1, 1.57-1.81 | 1.52 (0.17), 1.40-1.64 | 1.29 (0.11), 1.22-1.37 | 776.57 (156.91)1, 655.95-897.18 |
3 (13) | 1.78 (0.21), 1.64-1.91 | 1.39 (0.13)2, 1.30-1.47 | 1.18 (0.15)2, 1.09-1.28 | 745.04 (155.51), 625.51-864.58 |
4 (10) | 1.58 (0.17)1, 1.44-1.73 | 1.35 (0.15)2, 1.23-1.48 | 1.15 (0.12)3, 1.05-1.25 | 672.03 (145.33), 560.32-783.75 |
Grouped stages | ||||
0-1 (27) | 1.88 (0.20), 1.79-1.97 | 1.66 (0.22), 1.57-1.76 | 1.38 (0.13), 1.32-1.44 | 656.35 (101.46), 611.36-701.34 |
0-2 (40) | 1.82 (0.21), 1.75-1.90 | 1.62 (0.21), 1.54-1.70 | 1.35 (0.13), 1.31-1.40 | 691.25 (129.80), 643.64-738.86 |
2-4 (36) | 1.69 (0.19)4, 1.62-1.77 | 1.42 (0.16)4, 1.36-1.48 | 1.21 (0.14)4, 1.16-1.26 | 731.21 (153.32)4, 670.56-791.81 |
3-4 (23) | 1.70 (0.21), 1.60-1.80 | 1.37 (0.14)5, 1.31-1.44 | 1.17 (0.13)5, 1.10-1.23 | 708.54 (150.77), 633.56-783.51 |
Cut-off | Stage differentiations | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
TLV 656.25 cm3 | Prediction of stage ≥ 2 | 0.682 | 74.1 | 73.7 |
ADC (b = 800 s/mm2) | ||||
1.82 × 10-3 mm2/s | Prediction of stage ≥ 2 | 0.743 | 69.6 | 73.3 |
1.75 × 10-3 mm2/s | Prediction of stage ≥ 3 | 0.646 | 63.6 | 60.0 |
ADC (b = 800 s/mm2) | ||||
1.51 × 10-3 mm2/s | Prediction of stage ≥ 2 | 0.803 | 82.6 | 76.7 |
1.44 × 10-3 mm2/s | Prediction of stage ≥ 3 | 0.847 | 78.8 | 80.0 |
ADC (b = 800 s/mm2) | ||||
1.29 × 10-3 mm2/s | Prediction of stage ≥ 2 | 0.848 | 78.3 | 80.0 |
1.23 × 10-3 mm2/s | Prediction of stage ≥ 3 | 0.887 | 84.8 | 81.2 |
- Citation: Li H, Chen TW, Chen XL, Zhang XM, Li ZL, Zeng NL, Zhou L, Wang LY, Tang HJ, Li CP, Li L, Xie XY. Magnetic resonance-based total liver volume and magnetic resonance-diffusion weighted imaging for staging liver fibrosis in mini-pigs. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(48): 7225-7233
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i48/7225.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i48.7225