Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2012; 18(10): 1077-1084
Published online Mar 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i10.1077
Table 1 Characteristics of patients at the time of liver stiffness measurement (n = 606)
Patients,n606
Male, n (%)363 (59.9%)
Age (yr)53 ± 17
ALT (IU/L)59 ± 159
AST (IU/L)53 ± 142
GGT (IU/L)104 ± 218
AP (IU/L)97 ±84
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)1.1 ± 0.4
Prothrombin time (% of normal)96 ± 22
Chronic liver diseases, n (%)
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis236 (38.9%)
Chronic hepatitis B48 (7.9%)
Chronic hepatitis C97 (16.0%)
Alcoholic liver disease52 (8.6%)
Autoimmune hepatitis18 (3.0%)
PBC/PSC12 (2.0%)
Others14 (2.3%)
Healthy controls129 (21.3%)
Liver biopsy available, n (%)68 (11.2%)
Table 2 Diagnostic accuracy of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging shear wave velocity and liver stiffness measured by transient elastography
AUROCCut-offPPVNPVSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
Comparison to all patients [ARFI-SWV (n = 482)]
FS < 7.6 kPa0.9691.29 m/s0.930.9091.492.6
FS > 13.0 kPa0.9911.60 m/s0.850.9892.396.5
Comparison with liver biopsy [ARFI-SWV (n = 68) and FS-LS (n = 59)]
Non significant liver fibrosis
ARFI-SWV (n = 23)0.9291.32 m/s0.830.9187.080.0
FS-LS (n = 20)0.9207.6 kPa0.850.9594.985.0
Liver cirrhosis
ARFI-SWV (n = 28)0.9341.62 m/s1.00.8510085.7
FS-LS (n = 24)0.95813.0 kPa1.00.9110091.4