Brief Article
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2010; 16(46): 5861-5868
Published online Dec 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i46.5861
Table 1 Effect of meal volume and proximal-distal segmentation in intragastric distribution parameters (mean ± SE)
60 mL
180 mL
ROIs 1ROIs 2ROIs 3ROIs 1ROIs 2ROIs 3
Total stomach
Initial retention100100100100100100
Final retention82.5 ± 3.883.5 ± 3.283.8 ± 2.984.9 ± 3.385.7 ± 3.185.5 ± 3.2
Proximal (%)
Initial retention39.8 ± 6.851.7 ± 6.073.2 ± 3.8a.c38.6 ± 6.452.3 ± 6.475.2 ± 4.3a.c
Final retention14.1 ± 2.522.8 ± 3.041.6 ± 3.7a.c27.7 ± 5.7e38.3 ± 5.5g60.4 ± 4.2a.c,i
T1/2 (min)4.2 ± 0.67.0 ± 0.8> 18.011.0 ± 2.2> 18.0> 18.0
Distal (%)
Initial retention60.1 ± 6.748.1 ± 6.026.6 ± 3.8a.c61.4 ± 6.447.6 ± 6.424.7 ± 4.3a.c
Final retention68.4 ± 4.060.7 ± 3.242.2 ± 4.0a.c57.1 ± 4.247.6 ± 4.5g25.1 ± 2.5a.c,i
Maximum content80.0 ± 4.569.0 ± 3.748.0 ± 3.6a.c69.0 ± 5.056.7 ± 5.732.0 ± 3.8a.c
Table 2 Mean area under the curve and time distribution by statistical moments for proximal and distal regions for the three proximal-distal segmentations, after ingestion of the test meal of 60 and 180 mL (mean ± SE)
Proximal
Distal
ROIs 1ROIs 2ROIs 3ROIs 1ROIs 2ROIs 3
AUC (counts.s)
60 mL27.2 ± 2.931.4 ± 2.543.9 ± 1.7ac72.8 ± 2.968.6 ± 2.556.1 ± 1.7ac
180 mL35.3 ± 4.139.4 ± 3.249.0 ± 3.8a64.7 ± 4.160.6 ± 3.251.0 ± 3.8a
P< 0.09< 0.031< 0.1< 0.09< 0.031< 0.1
Statistical moments (min)
60 mL6.9 ± 0.37.7 ± 0.2c8.5 ± 0.1ac10.4 ± 0.310.5 ± 0.310.7 ± 0.2
180 mL8.7 ± 0.29.0 ± 0.19.2 ± 0.19.8 ± 0.310.0 ± 0.310.1 ± 0.3
P< 0.000011< 0.000031< 0.00061< 0.2< 0.1< 0.07