Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2010; 16(20): 2558-2565
Published online May 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i20.2558
Published online May 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i20.2558
Author | Yr | Adequate sequence generation? | Allocation concealment? | Blinding? | Incomplete outcome data addressed? | Free of other bias? | Risk of bias |
Andriulli et al[16] | 2008 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Low |
Yüksel et al[17] | 2008 | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Low |
Hung et al[2] | 2007 | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | High |
Lin et al[19] | 2006 | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear |
Cheng et al[21] | 2005 | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Low |
Dokas et al[9] | 2004 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear |
Chilovi et al[24] | 2003 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | High |
Udd et al[8] | 2001 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Low |
Schonekas et al[7] | 1999 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | High |
Author | Yr | Region | Arm | No. | Age (yr) | Male/female | NSAID | Aspirin | Antico-agulant | H. pylori positive | Comorbid disease | Gastric ulcer | Duodenal ulcer | Other ulcer3 | Study population |
Andriulli et al[16] | 2008 | European | High | 238 | 66.3 ± 15.6 | 151/87 | 75 | 72 | NA | NA | 19 | 88 | 150 | 0 | High-risk group1 |
Low | 236 | 66.8 ± 16.7 | 156/80 | 74 | 82 | NA | NA | 30 | 93 | 143 | 0 | ||||
Yüksel et al[17] | 2008 | European | High | 48 | 60.4 ± 14.0 | 38/10 | 19 | 22 | NA | NA | 21 | 16 | 32 | 0 | High-risk group1 |
Low | 49 | 56.3 ± 17.6 | 36/13 | 20 | 25 | NA | NA | 16 | 16 | 33 | 1 | ||||
Hung et al[2] | 2007 | Asia | High | 54 | 63.7 | 32/22 | 6 | 9 | NA | 30 | NA | 19 | 35 | 0 | High-risk group1 |
Low | 49 | 57.8 | 35/14 | 6 | 5 | NA | 33 | NA | 14 | 35 | 0 | ||||
Lin et al[19] | 2006 | Asia | High | 67 | 67 | 58/9 | NA | NA | NA | 48 | 53 | 26 | 35 | 6 | High-risk group1 |
Low | 66 | 71 | 57/9 | NA | NA | NA | 51 | 50 | 29 | 33 | 4 | ||||
Cheng et al[21] | 2005 | Asia | High | 52 | 62.5 ± 12.5 | 36/16 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 52 | 28 | 19 | 5 | Comorbid illnesses |
Low | 53 | 65.8 ± 13.8 | 31/22 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 53 | 29 | 20 | 4 | ||||
Dokas et al[9] | 2004 | European | High | 10 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | High-risk group1 |
Low | 14 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||||
Chilovi et al[24] | 2003 | European | High | 46 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Low | 45 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||||
Udd et al[8] | 2001 | European | High | 69 | 63.4 ± 15.7 | 41/28 | 37 | 7 | 10 | 46 | 55 | 39 | 30 | 0 | Unselected2 |
Low | 73 | 66.0 ± 13.3 | 44/29 | 41 | 16 | 4 | 45 | 54 | 38 | 35 | 0 | ||||
Schonekas et al[7] | 1999 | European | High | 82 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Low | 86 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Author | Arm | Endoscopic therapy | Schedule of the PPIs |
Andriulli et al[16] | High | Epinephrine injection or thermal or mechanical therapy | OME or PAN 80 mg iv bolus, 8 mg/h infusion × 3 d |
Low | OME or PAN 40 mg iv bolus 24 h × 3 d | ||
Yüksel et al[17] | High | Epinephrine injection and thermal therapy | PAN 80 mg iv bolus, 8 mg/h infusion × 3 d |
Low | PAN 40 mg iv bolus Q12 h × 3 d | ||
Hung et al[2] | High | Epinephrine injection or thermal therapy | PAN 80 mg iv bolus, 8 mg/h infusion × 3 d |
Low | PAN 80 mg iv bolus, 40 mg iv bolus Q12 h × 3 d | ||
Lin et al[19] | High | Epinephrine injection | OME 40 mg infusion Q6 h × 3 d |
Low | OME 40 mg infusion Q12 h × 3 d | ||
Cheng et al[21] | High | Epinephrine injection or thermal therapy | OME 80 mg iv bolus, 200 mg infusion 24 h × 3 d |
Low | OME 80 mg iv bolus, 80 mg infusion 24 h × 3 d | ||
Dokas et al[9] | High | Epinephrine injection or mechanical therapy | OME 80 mg iv bolus, 160 mg infusion Q24 h × 3 d |
Low | OME 40 mg iv bolus Q12 h × 3 d | ||
Chilovi et al[24] | High | NA | PAN 80 mg iv bolus, 40 mg iv bolus Q8 h |
Low | OME 80 mg iv bolus, 40 mg | ||
Udd et al[8] | High | Epinephrine injection or thermal or mechanical therapy | OME 80 mg iv bolus, 8 mg/h infusion × 3 d |
Low | OME 20 mg iv bolus 24 h × 3 d | ||
Schonekas et al[7] | High | NA | PAN 40 mg iv bolus 8 mg/h infusion × 3 d |
Low | PAN 40 mg iv bolus Q24 h × 3 d |
-
Citation: Wu LC, Cao YF, Huang JH, Liao C, Gao F. High-dose
vs low-dose proton pump inhibitors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(20): 2558-2565 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i20/2558.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i20.2558