Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2010; 16(16): 1986-1992
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1986
Published online Apr 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1986
Table 1 Demographic data of 298 patients with advanced esophageal cancer n (%)
Variables | Surgery alone | NeoadjuvantCRT | Significance |
Patients | 108 | 190 | |
Sex | NS | ||
Male | 86 (80.0) | 151 (79.4) | |
Female | 22 (20.0) | 39 (20.6) | |
Age (yr) | 63.6 | 60.1 | P < 0.01 |
< 50 | 11 (10.2) | 38 (20.0) | |
50-70 | 65 (60.2) | 124 (65.3) | |
> 70 | 32 (29.6) | 18 (14.7) | |
Histological subtype | 0.871 | ||
Squamous cell carcinoma | 55 (51.0) | 100 (52.6) | |
Adenocarcinoma | 53 (49.0) | 90 (47.4) | |
No. of resected LNs (median, range) | 30 (3-74) | 27 (4-55) | P = 0.007 |
pN category | P < 0.001 | ||
pN0 | 27 (25.0) | 98 (51.6) | |
pN1 | 81 (75.0) | 92 (48.5) | |
LN ratio | P < 0.001 | ||
pN0 | 27 (25.0) | 98 (51.6) | |
LN ratio < 0.2 | 52 (48.1) | 69 (36.3) | |
LN ratio ≥ 0.2 | 29 (26.9) | 23 (12.1) | |
pM1 organ | 11 (10.1) | 8 (4.2) | NS |
R category | NS | ||
R0 | 98 (92.6) | 179 (94.2) | |
R1/R2 | 10 (7.4) | 11 (5.8) | |
Response after neoadjuvant therapy | |||
Minor response | - | 112 (59.0) | |
Major response | - | 78 (41.0) |
Table 2 Univariate survival analysis of 298 patients with advanced esophageal cancer
Variables | P | Surgery alone | Neoadjuvant CRT | ||
n | 5-yr survival (%) | n | 5-yr survival (%) | ||
Patients | NS | 108 | 20.4 | 190 | 25.6 |
Sex | |||||
Male | NS | 86 | 22.0 | 151 | 24.4 |
Female | NS | 22 | 13.8 | 39 | 32.6 |
Age (yr) | |||||
< 50 | NS | 11 | 58.3 | 38 | 33.7 |
50-70 | 0.015 | 65 | 15.8 | 124 | 24.7 |
> 70 | NS | 32 | 15.1 | 18 | 0.0 |
Histological subtype | |||||
Squamous cell carcinoma | NS | 55 | 31.3 | 100 | 19.8 |
Adenocarcinoma | 0.030 | 53 | 16.9 | 90 | 35.4 |
pN category | |||||
pN0 | NS | 27 | 36.5 | 98 | 41.6 |
pN1 | NS | 81 | 15.4 | 92 | 12.3 |
LN ratio | |||||
pN0 | NS | 27 | 36.5 | 98 | 41.6 |
LN ratio < 0.2 | NS | 52 | 23.7 | 69 | 10.3 |
LN ratio ≥ 0.2 | NS | 29 | 0.0 | 23 | 0.0 |
pM1 organ | NS | 11 | 0.0 | 8 | 0.0 |
R category | |||||
R0 | NS | 98 | 22.1 | 179 | 26.4 |
R1/R2 | NS | 10 | 0.0 | 11 | 0.0 |
Response after neoadjuvant therapy | |||||
Minor response | - | 112 | 11.4 | ||
Major response | - | 78 | 42.4 |
Table 3 Influence of neoadjuvant CRT on extent of LN metastases and extracapsular LNI n (%)
T3/4 Category only(n = 298) | Surgery alone | Neoadjuvant CRT | Surgery vs neoadjuvant CRT | |||
Total | pN1 caps (+) | Total | pN1 caps (+) | Total | pN1 caps (+) | |
Total | 108 (100.0) | 45 (41.7) | 190 (100.0) | 43 (22.6) | P < 0.001 | |
pN0M0 | 27 (25.0) | - | 98 (51.6) | - | P < 0.001 | |
pN1M0 caps (-) | 28 (27.8) | - | 38 (20.0) | - | NS | |
pN1M0 caps (+) | 19 (17.6) | 19 (100) | 32 (16.8) | 32 (100.0) | NS | |
pM1 lymph | 23 (21.6) | 18 (78.3) | 14 (7.4) | 8 (57.1) | P < 0.001 | NS |
pM1 organ | 11 (10.1) | 8 (72.7) | 8 (4.2) | 3 (37.5) | NS | NS |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for patients with neoadjuvant CRT
Variable | HR | 95% CI | P |
Age | 1.00 | 0.99-1.03 | 0.376 |
Sex | 0.353 | ||
Male | 1 (ref) | ||
Female | 0.77 | 0.44-1.34 | |
pN/pM category | 0.000 | ||
pN0/pM0 | 1 (ref) | ||
pN1 (-)/pM0 | 1.89 | 1.10-3.22 | 0.021 |
pN1 (+)/pM0 | 2.70 | 1.57-4.64 | 0.000 |
pM1 lymph | 2.92 | 1.49-5.74 | 0.002 |
pM1 organ | 3.92 | 1.76-8.72 | 0.001 |
Histology | 0.145 | ||
Squamous cell carcinoma | 1 (ref) | ||
Adenocarcinoma | 0.73 | 0.48-1.11 | |
Response | 0.010 | ||
Minor response | 1 (ref) | ||
Major response | 0.56 | 0.36-0.87 |
- Citation: Metzger R, Bollschweiler E, Drebber U, Mönig SP, Schröder W, Alakus H, Kocher M, Baldus SE, Hölscher AH. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: Impact on extracapsular lymph node involvement. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(16): 1986-1992
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i16/1986.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i16.1986