Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2005; 11(35): 5545-5548
Published online Sep 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i35.5545
Published online Sep 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i35.5545
Table 1 Summary of diagnostic efficacy of all tests used in this study
| URINELISA(%) | 13C-UBT (%) | RUT (%) | Culture (%) | Histology (%) | |
| Sensitivity | 91.7 (88.7–94.8) | 96.7 (94.7–98.7) | 94.4 (91.9–96.9) | 55.6 (50.1–61.1) | 86.7 (83–90.4) |
| Specificity | 90.8 (87.6–94.0) | 95.2 (92.8–97.6) | 95.2 (92.8–97.6) | 100 (100) | 79.7 (75.3–84.1) |
| PPV | 96.4 (94.3–98.5) | 96.7 (94.7–98.7) | 96.6 (94.6–98.6) | 100 (100) | 85.6 (81.7–89.5) |
| NPV | 80.6 (76.2–85.0) | 95.2 (92.8–97.6) | 92.3 (89.4–95.2) | 61.2 (55.8–66.6) | 80.6 (76.2–85) |
- Citation: Kuo FC, Wang SW, Wu IC, Yu FJ, Yang YC, Wu JY, Wang WM, Wu DC. Evaluation of urine ELISA test for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection in Taiwan: A prospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(35): 5545-5548
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i35/5545.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i35.5545