Copyright
©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2005; 11(26): 3980-3984
Published online Jul 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.3980
Published online Jul 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.3980
Drugs | IC50 (nmol/L) | |
BEL-7402 | SMMC-7721 | |
LDM | 0.003 ± 0.0006 | 0.064 ± 0.013 |
MMC | 152.0 ± 27.3 | 1 136.6 ± 72.2 |
ADM | 51.7 ± 6.5 | 378.0 ± 39.6 |
LDC | 0.0032 ± 0.0005 | 0.0597 ± 0.0064 |
LDP | 2 896.0 ± 345.5 | 1 896.0 ± 354.0 |
Experiment Groups | Dose(mg/kg) | Ivtimes | Number of mice | Body weight (g) | Tumorweight (g) | Inhibitionrate (%) | P | |||
Begin | End | Begin | End | |||||||
I | Control | 1 | 10 | 10 | 19.6 | 35 | 4.19 ± 1.36 | --- | --- | |
LDM | 0.1 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 20.2 | 26.5 | 0.64 ± 0.17 | 84.7 | < 0.01 | |
0.05 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 19.6 | 27.5 | 1.19 ± 0.50 | 71.6 | < 0.01 | ||
0.025 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 19.9 | 30.3 | 1.60 ± 0.61 | 61.8 | < 0.01 | ||
0.0125 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 19.5 | 30.7 | 1.65 ± 0.50 | 60.6 | < 0.01 | ||
0.00625 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 19.9 | 31.5 | 2.48 ± 0.78 | 40.8 | < 0.01 | ||
MMC | 5 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 19.8 | 32.3 | 1.72 ± 0.40 | 58.9 | < 0.01 | |
2.5 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 19.9 | 31.5 | 2.10 ± 0.84 | 49.9 | < 0.01 | ||
1.25 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 33.4 | 2.34 ± 0.83 | 44.2 | < 0.01 | ||
II | Control | 2 | 10 | 10 | 20.2 | 35.2 | 3.83 ± 1.22 | --- | --- | |
LDM | 0.1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 20.2 | 23.5 | 0.43 ± 0.16 | 88.8 | < 0.01 | |
0.05 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.7 | 26.6 | 0.67 ± 0.20 | 82.5 | < 0.01 | ||
0.025 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 20.1 | 29.6 | 0.96 ± 0.30 | 74.9 | < 0.01 | ||
0.0125 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 20.3 | 32.8 | 1.55 ± 0.63 | 59.5 | < 0.01 | ||
0.00625 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 31.9 | 1.98 ± 0.77 | 48.3 | < 0.01 | ||
MMC | 5 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 19.6 | 23.9 | 1.01 ± 0.29 | 73.6 | < 0.01 | |
2.5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 20.2 | 30.2 | 1.76 ± 0.76 | 54 | < 0.01 | ||
1.25 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 20.3 | 33.8 | 1.83 ± 0.48 | 52.2 | < 0.01 | ||
III | Control | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.2 | 28.9 | 3.33 ± 1.04 | --- | --- | |
LDM | 0.1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.7 | 20.2 | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 89.5 | < 0.01 | |
0.05 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.8 | 25.2 | 0.63 ± 0.23 | 81.1 | < 0.01 | ||
0.025 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.2 | 23.7 | 0.96 ± 0.45 | 71.2 | < 0.01 | ||
0.0125 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.4 | 27.8 | 1.59 ± 0.72 | 52.3 | < 0.01 | ||
0.00625 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.6 | 26.6 | 2.22 ± 0.81 | 33.3 | < 0.05 | ||
MMC | 5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.8 | 25.1 | 1.08 ± 0.59 | 67.6 | < 0.01 | |
2.5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.6 | 25.1 | 1.45 ± 0.88 | 56.5 | < 0.01 | ||
1.25 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 19.6 | 28.1 | 2.28 ± 0.96 | 31.5 | < 0.05 |
Groups | Dose(mg/kg) | Number of mice(begin/end) | BWC (g) | Tumor volume(mm3) | Inhibitionrate (%) |
Control | 6/6 | -0.1 | 624.7 ± 360.1 | - | |
LDM | 0.05 | 6/6 | +0.3 | 195.6 ± 94.1 | 68.7a |
0.025 | 6/6 | -0.1 | 454.9 ± 302.3 | 27.2 | |
MMC | 1.25 | 6/6 | -1.5 | 409.1 ± 225.9 | 34.5 |
- Citation: Huang YH, Shang BY, Zhen YS. Antitumor efficacy of lidamycin on hepatoma and active moiety of its molecule. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(26): 3980-3984
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i26/3980.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.3980