Brief Reports
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2005; 11(19): 2975-2980
Published online May 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i19.2975
Table 1 Criteria for cellular phenotype.
HGM expressionCon A expressionMUC2 expressionCD10 expression
G-type(+)(+)(–)(–)
O-type(+)(+)(+)(+)
CI-type(–)(–)(+)(+)
N-type(–)(–)(–)(–)
Table 2 Correlation of pathological factors and expression of syndecan-1 and E-cadherin in each mucin phenotype.
G-type (n = 34)O-type (n = 54)CI-type (n = 20)N-type (n = 12)P
Tumor size (cm, mean±SD)3.5±0.92.9±0.73.1±0.62.7±0.4NS
Histology Solely
differentiated type1645183<0.05ac
Complex type18929<0.05ac
Lymphatic and/or
venous invasion1171455<0.05eg
Lymph node metastasis7814NS
Syndecan-1 expression1043188<0.05ac
E-cadherin expression2232158NS
IM2141158NS
IM
with G-type25210<0.05a
Table 3 Correlation of pathological factors and expression of syndecan-1.
Syndecan-1 expression
P
Positive (n = 80)Negative (n = 40)
Histology
Solely differentiated type6616<0.05
Complex type1424<0.05
Lymphatic and/or venous invasion12813NS
Lymph node metastasis128NS
IM with G-type226<0.05
Table 4 Correlation of pathological factors and E-cadherin.
E-cadherin expression
P
Positive (n = 77)Abnormal (n = 43)
Histology
Solely differentiated type5729NS
Complex type2014NS
Lymphatic and/or venous invasion12318NS
Lymph node metastasis713<0.05
IM with G-type244NS