Brief Reports
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2005; 11(19): 2960-2966
Published online May 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i19.2960
Table 1 Killing effect of different sera on schistosomula in vitro.
SeraSchistosomula (n)Mortality (%)
24 h48 h72 h
NRS20623.076.286.4
Heat-inactive normal23416.941.043.6
rat sera
NMS2406.423.830.0
RS2314.716.921.2
Table 2 Percentage enrichment of phages by biopanning.
BiopanningPhages addedPhages washedYield (%)
11.5×10112.47×1051.65×106
21.0×10114.26×1064.26×105
31.0×10115.00×1075.00×104
Table 3 DNA and AA sequences of the positive phage clones (P3, P5).
CloneDNA sequenceAA sequence
P3AAACGGAGGCTGCGGCCCAGTK R R L R P S R V R I E
AGAGTGAGAATAGAA
P5AATATGCCTATTAGCATGAAGN M P A S M K R V R I E
AGAGTGAGAATAGAA
Table 4 Worm reduction in mice immunized with phage clones (mean±SD).
GroupsMice (n)Worms (n)Worm reduction rates (%)P
Mix phage (P3+P5) immunized1219.42±5.9934.900.000a
P3 immunized1220.58±5.3631.010.001a
P5 immunized1225.50±4.1714.520.074
Original phage control1227.92±5.086.400.338
TBS control1229.83±2.92
Table 5 Reduction in egg load in liver of mice immunized with phage clones (mean±SD).
GroupsMice (n)LEPG (×104)LEPG reduction rate (%)P
Mix phage (P3+P5) immunized120.890±0.06367.620.000a
P3 immunized121.073±0.13661.200.000a
P5 immunized121.769±0.06335.650.000a
Original phage control122.255±0.14217.970.013a
TBS control122.749±0.144