Esophageal Cancer Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 15, 2003; 9(12): 2654-2657
Published online Dec 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i12.2654
Epoxide hydrolase Tyr113His polymorphism is not associated with susceptibility to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in population of North China
Jian-Hui Zhang, Xia Jin, Yan Li, Wei Guo, Na Wang, Deng-Gui Wen, Zhi-Feng Chen, Gang Kuang, Li-Zhen Wei, Shi-Jie Wang, Hebei Cancer Institute, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
Rui Wang, Shi-Jie Wang, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the Scientific Grant of Educational Department of Hebei Province, China, No. 2001150
Correspondence to: Professor Shi-Jie Wang, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Jiankanglu 12, Shijiazhuang 050011, China. wang.sj@hbmu.edu
Telephone: +86-311-6085231 Fax: +86-311-6077634
Received: June 16, 2003
Revised: June 25, 2003
Accepted: August 25, 2003
Published online: December 15, 2003

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the possible association of microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) Tyr113His polymorphism with susceptibility to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in a population of North China.

METHODS: The mEH Tyr113His genotypes were determined by polymerase-chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis in 257 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and 252 healthy subjects as a control group.

RESULTS: The frequencies for Tyr and His alleles were 44.2%, 55.8% in ESCC patients, and 44.0% and 56.0% in healthy subjects, respectively. No statistic difference in allele distribution was observed between ESCC patients and controls (χ2 = 0.008, P = 0.929). The overall genotype distribution difference was not observed between cancer cases and controls (χ2 = 2.116, P = 0.347). Compared with Tyr/Tyr genotype, neither His/His genotype nor in combination with Tyr/His genotype significantly modified the risk of the development of ESCC, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.076 (95%CI = 0.850-1.361) and 0.756 (95%CI = 0.493-1.157), respectively. When stratified for sex, age, smoking status and family history of upper gastrointestinal cancer, His/His genotype alone or in combination with Tyr/His genotype also did not show any significant influence on the risk of developing ESCC.

CONCLUSION: MEH Tyr113His polymorphism may not be used as a stratification marker in screening individuals at a high risk of ESCC.




INTRODUCTION

China is one of the prevalent areas of esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). Exposure to environmental carcinogens is considered as the main risk factors of ESCC[1,2]. Among them, chemical carcinogens such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in consumed tobacco or ingested food may contribute to the high incidence of ESCC in China[3,4]. Metabolization of PAHs involves a complex enzymatic mechanism. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH) is an enzyme that hydrolyzes epoxides such as PHA, yielding corresponding trans-dihydrodiols. Usually, this hydrolysis acts as a detoxifying step, although in some instances, trans-dihydrodiols generated from PAHs are highly toxic and mutagenic. Therefore, mEH plays a dual role in the detoxification and activation of procarcinogens, and its role in carcinogenesis may depend on exposures to different environmental substrates[5].

There are two polymorphic sites that affect the enzyme activity in human mEH gene. One variant is characterized by substitution of histidine for tyrosine at the amino acid position 113, the other is characterized by substitution of arginine for histidine at the position 139. The proteins encoded by polymorphic alleles demonstrated different enzyme activities in vitro[6]. MEH polymorphism has been associated with chemical carcinogen-induced cancers occurring in lung[7,8], ovary[9], colorectum[10] and liver[11]. The correlation of mEH polymorphism with susceptibility to ESCC has not been reported so far. Therefore, the current study investigated the Tyr113His polymorphism in mEH exon 3 in ESCC patients and healthy individuals from North China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects

This study included 257 patients with histologically confirmed esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and 252 healthy individuals without overt cancer. The cancer patients were hospitalized for surgery in the Fourth Affiliated hospital, Hebei Medical University between 2001 and 2003. The healthy subjects were from the same hospital for physical examination in the same period. All of the patients and control subjects were from Shijiazhuang city or its surrounding regions. Information of sex, age, smoking habits and family history was obtained from cancer patients and healthy controls by interview following sampling. The smokers were defined as former or current smoking 5 cigarettes per day for at least two years. The individuals with at least one first-degree relative or at least two second-degree relatives having esophageal/cardiac/ gastric cancer were defined as having family history of upper gastrointestinal cancers (UGIC). The smoking status and family history were available from some of the cases and controls. Informed consent was obtained from all the recruited subjects. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hebei Cancer Institute.

DNA extraction

Five ml of venous blood from each subject was drawn in Vacutainer tubes containing EDTA and stored at 4 °C. Genomic DNA was extracted within one week after sampling by using proteinase K digestion followed by a salting out procedure.

MEH genotyping by PCR and restriction fragment analysis

The exon 3 T to C variant in mEH gene, changing tyrosine 113 to histidine, creates an EcoR restriction site (GATATC), which can be exploited for genotyping by PCR and subsequent RFLP analysis[12]. PCR was performed in a 25 µl volume containing 100 ng of DNA template, 2.5 µl of 10 × buffer, 1 U of Taq-DNA-polymerase (BioDev-Tech., Beijing, China), 200 µmol of dNTPs and 200 nmol of sense primer (5’-GATCGATAAGTTCCGTTTCACC-3’) and antisense primer (5’-ATCCTTAGTCTTGAAGTGAGGAT-3’). Initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min was followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 sec, at 56 °C for 30 sec and at 72 °C for 1 min. Subsequently, the PCR products were digested with 10 units of EcoR V (TakaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Dalian, China) overnight at 37 °C and separated on a 3% agarose gel. RFLP bands were visualized through ethidium bromide staining under UV light. Tyr113 wild-type homozygote was characterized by two bands at the position of 140 bp and 22 bp, while His113 homozygotes were identified by a single band (162 bp) and the heterozygotes by three bands (162 bp, 140 bp and 22 bp). For a negative control, each PCR reaction used distilled water instead of DNA in the reaction system. For 10% of the samples, the reaction was repeated once.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS10.0 software package (SPSS Company, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Comparison of mEH genotype distribution in the study groups was performed by means of two-sided contingency tables using Chi-square test. A probability level of 5% was considered significant. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using an unconditional logistic regression model and adjusted by age and sex accordingly.

RESULTS

The mean age of all ESCC cases was 58.5 ± 9.39 years (range 32-85) and that of controls was 49.4 ± 8.56 years (range 29-79 years). The gender distribution in ESCC patients (66.5% men) was comparable to that in healthy controls (58.3% men). Moreover, the proportion of smokers in ESCC patients (52.0%) was also not significantly different from that in healthy controls (49.5%) ( χ2 = 0.283, P = 0.595). In addition, the frequency of the positive family history of UGIC in ESCC patients (44.1%) was significantly higher than that in healthy controls (14.0%) ( χ2 = 49.87, P < 0.0001). Thus, the positive family history of UGIC significantly increased the relative risk to develop ESCC in this population, with an age and sex adjusted odds ratio of 4.06 (95%CI = 2.46-6.69). The demographic distribution of ESCC patients and healthy controls is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics and mEH Tyr113His polymorphism in ESCC patients and healthy individuals.
GroupsControl n (%)ESCC n (%)
Sex
Male147 (58.3)171 (66.5)
Female105 (41.7)86 (33.5)
Age (mean ± SD)49.4 ± 8.5658.5 ± 9.39
Smoking statusa
Ex-or current smoker110 (49.5)130 (52.0)
Non-smoker112 (50.5)120 (48.0)
Family history of UGICb
Positive31 (14.0)104 (44.1)
Negative191 (86.0)132 (55.9)
Genotype
Tyr/Tyr76 (30.2)49 (37.1)
Tyr/His71 (28.2)32 (24.2)
His/His105 (41.6)51 (38.7)
Allele type
T223 (44.2)226 (44.0)
C281 (55.8)288 (56.0)

MEH Tyr113His genotyping was successfully performed in all study subjects. The mEH genotype distribution was not correlated with gender, age and smoking status both in ESCC patients and in healthy controls (data not shown). The Tyr and His allele frequencies were 44.0%, 56.0% in ESCC patients and 44.2%, 55.8% in healthy controls, respectively. There was no statistic difference in allele distribution between ESCC patients and controls ( χ2 = 0.008, P = 0.929). The frequencies of Tyr/Tyr, Tyr/His and His/His genotype were 30.2%, 28.2% and 41.6% in healthy controls, respectively. The overall mEH genotype distribution in ESCC patients was not significantly different from that in healthy controls ( χ2 =2.116, P = 0.347) (Table 1).

By using Tyr/Tyr as the reference genotype, neither His/ His genotype alone nor in combination with Tyr/His genotype significantly modified the risk of ESCC, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.076 (95%CI = 0.850-1.361) and 0.756 (95%CI = 0.493-1.157), respectively. When stratified for sex, age, smoking status and family history of upper gastrointestinal cancer, the frequency of His/His and Tyr/His genotype in ESCC patients was not significantly different from healthy controls. Consistently, His/His alone, or in combination with Tyr/His genotype, did not show any significant influence on the risk of ESCC (Table 2).

Table 2 Influence of mEH Tyr113His polymorphism on ESCC development.
Tyr/TyrTyr/His + His/HisHis/HisaOR(95%CI)caOR (95%CI)d
Overall
Normal76 (30.2)176 (69.8)105 (41.7)
ESCC84 (32.7)173 (67.3)115 (44.7)0.756 (0.493~1.157)1.076 (0.850~1.361)
Male
Normal44 (30.6)100 (69.4)60 (41.7)
ESCC61 (35.7)110 (64.3)73 (42.7)0.724 (0.427~1.225)1.087 (0.811~1.458)
Female
Normal32 (29.6)76 (70.4)45 (41.7)
ESCC23 (26.8)63 (73.2)42 (48.8)0.825 (0.398~1.710)1.047 (0.704~1.558)
Age ≤ 50
Normal46 (32.6)95 (67.4)60 (42.6)
ESCC19 (33.9)37 (66.1)22 (39.3)0.867 (0.450~1.671)1.064 (0.738~1.534)
Age > 50
Normal30 (27.0)81 (73.0)45 (40.6)
ESCC65 (32.3)136 (67.7)93 (46.3)0.790 (0.472~1.323)1.018 (0.768~1.348)
Nonsmokera
Normal31 (27.7)81 (72.3)49 (43.7)
ESCC34 (28.3)86 (71.7)60 (50.0)0.659 (0.338~1.286)1.135 (0.790~1.631)
Smoker
Normal35 (31.8)75 (68.2)41 (37.3)
ESCC46 (35.4)84 (64.6)52 (40.0)0.901 (0.494~1.644)1.022 (0.728~1.433)
Negative family historyb
Normal59 (30.9)132 (69.1)80 (41.9)
ESCC49 (37.1)83 (62.9)51 (38.7)0.660 (0.385~1.134)1.237 (0.912~1.678)
Positive family history
Normal7 (22.6)24 (77.4)10 (32.2)
ESCC29 (27.9)75 (72.1)52 (50.0)0.638 (0.241~1.689)0.946 (0.546~1.639)
DISCUSSION

Chemical carcinogens in consumed alcohol and tobacco, polluted water, ingested food, are in general considered as the main risk factors of ESCC in China. However, not all individuals exposed to the above exogenous risk factors will develop ESCC, indicating that the host susceptibility factors may play an important role in cancer development. In recent years, many polymorphic carcinogen metabolic enzymes, such as aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2)[13], cytochrome P450(CYP)[14,15], glutathione S-transferase(GST)[15,16], methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR)[17], NAD(P)H, quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1)[18,19] have been found to be able to modify the susceptibility to chemically induced cancers including esophageal and gastric cancer. Therefore, these polymorphic genes, alone or in combination with each other or with other newly developed genetic markers, may be used as predicative parameters for screening individuals at a high risk of ESCC.

MEH is involved in the metabolism of environmental carcinogens. Polymorphisms in mEH gene might affect the enzyme expression and lead to different phenotypes, probably by the alteration of protein stability[6]. Tyr113His substitution in exon 3 could reduce the enzyme expression by about 40%, producing a slow phenotype with a low epoxide hydrolase activity. In contrast, Arg139 His in exon 4 could increase the expression by about 25%, producing a fast phenotype with an increased enzyme activity[6]. The relationship between mEH gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to cancers studied had inconsistent conclusions due to different cancer types and populations. The Tyr allele in exon 3 was reported to increase the risk of several cancer types including ovarian cancer[9], oropharyngeal carcer[20] and acute leukaemia[21], whereas the His allele was associated with increased susceptibility to cancers occurring in colon[10], liver[11] and cervix[22]. In addition, gene-environment interaction was strongly suggested by some investigations, thus, cumulative cigarette smoking might play a pivotal role in association of His homozygous genotype with lung cancer development, altering the direction of risk from a risk factor in nonsmokers to a relatively protective factor in heavy smokers[8].

Recently, a slight decrease in mEH Tyr113 frequency was observed in esophageal adenocarcinoma (42%) compared to controls (53%, P = 0.05)[23]. In the present study, the frequencies of Tyr/Tyr, Tyr/His and His/His genotype in healthy controls were in consistent with a recent report from a Chinese group[24]. The genotype distribution difference was not found in ESCC patients and healthy controls, as well as in stratification comparison according to the sex, age ( > 50 or ≤ 50), smoking status (never smoking or current and ever smoking), and family history of UGIC. The result suggests that although mEH Tyr113His polymorphism is correlated with some cancer types, this genetic alteration may not be associated with susceptibility to ESCC in population of North China.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We greatly acknowledge Mr. Baoshan Zhao and Mr. Fanshu Meng for their assistance in recruiting study subjects.

Footnotes

Edited by Su Q and Wang XL

References
1.  Yokokawa Y, Ohta S, Hou J, Zhang XL, Li SS, Ping YM, Nakajima T. Ecological study on the risks of esophageal cancer in Ci-Xian, China: the importance of nutritional status and the use of well water. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:620-624.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Launoy G, Milan CH, Faivre J, Pienkowski P, Milan CI, Gignoux M. Alcohol, tobacco and oesophageal cancer: effects of the duration of consumption, mean intake and current and former consumption. Br J Cancer. 1997;75:1389-1396.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 77]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  van Gijssel HE, Divi RL, Olivero OA, Roth MJ, Wang GQ, Dawsey SM, Albert PS, Qiao YL, Taylor PR, Dong ZW. Semiquantitation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in human esophagus by immunohistochemistry and the automated cellular imaging system. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:1622-1629.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Roth MJ, Dawsey SM, Wang G, Tangrea JA, Zhou B, Ratnasinghe D, Woodson KG, Olivero OA, Poirier MC, Frye BL. Association between GSTM1*0 and squamous dysplasia of the esophagus in the high risk region of Linxian, China. Cancer Lett. 2000;156:73-81.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Omiecinski CJ, Aicher L, Swenson L. Developmental expression of human microsomal epoxide hydrolase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;269:417-423.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Hassett C, Aicher L, Sidhu JS, Omiecinski CJ. Human microsomal epoxide hydrolase: genetic polymorphism and functional expression in vitro of amino acid variants. Hum Mol Genet. 1994;3:421-428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 346]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 368]  [Article Influence: 12.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Lee WJ, Brennan P, Boffetta P, London SJ, Benhamou S, Rannug A, To-Figueras J, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Shields P, Gaspari L. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase polymorphisms and lung cancer risk: a quantitative review. Biomarkers. 2002;7:230-241.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Zhou W, Thurston SW, Liu G, Xu LL, Miller DP, Wain JC, Lynch TJ, Su L, Christiani DC. The interaction between microsomal epoxide hydrolase polymorphisms and cumulative cigarette smoking in different histological subtypes of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:461-466.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Lancaster JM, Brownlee HA, Bell DA, Futreal PA, Marks JR, Berchuck A, Wiseman RW, Taylor JA. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase polymorphism as a risk factor for ovarian cancer. Mol Carcinog. 1996;17:160-162.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Harrison DJ, Hubbard AL, MacMillan J, Wyllie AH, Smith CA. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase gene polymorphism and susceptibility to colon cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:168-171.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Tiemersma EW, Omer RE, Bunschoten A, van't Veer P, Kok FJ, Idris MO, Kadaru AM, Fedail SS, Kampman E. Role of genetic polymorphism of glutathione-S-transferase T1 and microsomal epoxide hydrolase in aflatoxin-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:785-791.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Cortessis V, Siegmund K, Chen Q, Zhou N, Diep A, Frankl H, Lee E, Zhu QS, Haile R, Levy D. A case-control study of microsomal epoxide hydrolase, smoking, meat consumption, glutathione S-transferase M3, and risk of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2381-2385.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Matsuo K, Hamajima N, Shinoda M, Hatooka S, Inoue M, Takezaki T, Tajima K. Gene-environment interaction between an aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (ALDH2) polymorphism and alcohol consumption for the risk of esophageal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22:913-916.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 147]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 154]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Tan W, Song N, Wang GQ, Liu Q, Tang HJ, Kadlubar FF, Lin DX. Impact of genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 2E1 and glutathione S-transferases M1, T1, and P1 on susceptibility to esophageal cancer among high-risk individuals in China. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:551-556.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Cai L, Yu SZ, Zhang ZF. Glutathione S-transferases M1, T1 genotypes and the risk of gastric cancer: a case-control study. World J Gastroenterol. 2001;7:506-509.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Cai L, Yu SZ, Zhan ZF. Cytochrome P450 2E1 genetic polymorphism and gastric cancer in Changle, Fujian Province. World J Gastroenterol. 2001;7:792-795.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Song C, Xing D, Tan W, Wei Q, Lin D. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms increase risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a Chinese population. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3272-3275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Zhang JH, Li Y, Wang R, Geddert H, Guo W, Wen DG, Chen ZF, Wei LZ, Kuang G, He M. NQO1 C609T polymorphism associated with esophageal cancer and gastric cardiac carcinoma in North China. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:1390-1393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Zhang J, Schulz WA, Li Y, Wang R, Zotz R, Wen D, Siegel D, Ross D, Gabbert HE, Sarbia M. Association of NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) C609T polymorphism with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a German Caucasian and a northern Chinese population. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24:905-909.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Amador AG, Righi PD, Radpour S, Everett ET, Weisberger E, Langer M, Eckert GJ, Christen AG, Campbell S, Summerlin DJ. Polymorphisms of xenobiotic metabolizing genes in oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:440-445.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Lebailly P, Willett EV, Moorman AV, Roman E, Cartwright R, Morgan GJ, Wild CP. Genetic polymorphisms in microsomal epoxide hydrolase and susceptibility to adult acute myeloid leukaemia with defined cytogenetic abnormalities. Br J Haematol. 2002;116:587-594.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Sierra-Torres CH, Au WW, Arrastia CD, Cajas-Salazar N, Robazetti SC, Payne DA, Tyring SK. Polymorphisms for chemical metabolizing genes and risk for cervical neoplasia. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2003;41:69-76.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Casson AG, Zheng Z, Chiasson D, MacDonald K, Riddell DC, Guernsey JR, Guernsey DL, McLaughlin J. Associations between genetic polymorphisms of Phase I and II metabolizing enzymes, p53 and susceptibility to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27:139-146.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Yin L, Pu Y, Liu TY, Tung YH, Chen KW, Lin P. Genetic polymorphisms of NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase, CYP1A1 and microsomal epoxide hydrolase and lung cancer risk in Nanjing, China. Lung Cancer. 2001;33:133-141.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]