Clinical Research Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2003. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 15, 2003; 9(11): 2601-2604
Published online Nov 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i11.2601
Effects of bowel rehabilitation and combined trophic therapy on intestinal adaptation in short bowel patients
Guo-Hao Wu, Zhao-Han Wu, Zhao-Guang Wu, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fu Dan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Guo-Hao Wu, Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fu Dan University, Shanghai 200032, China. wugh@zshospital.net
Telephone: +86-21-64041990 Ext 2365 Fax: +86-21-64038472
Received: March 12, 2003
Revised: May 1, 2003
Accepted: May 11, 2003
Published online: November 15, 2003

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effects of bowel rehabilitation and combined trophic therapy on intestinal adaptation in short bowel patients.

METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with severe short-bowel syndrome (SBS) were employed in the present study, whose average length of jejunum-ileum was 35.8 ± 21.2 cm. The TPN treatment was initiated early to attain positive nitrogen balance and prevent severe weight loss. The TPN composition was designated to be individualized and altered when necessary. Enteral feeding was given as soon as possible after resection and increased gradually. Meals were distributed throughout the day. Eight patients received treatment of growth hormone (0.14 mg/kg•d) and glutamine (0.3 g/kg•d) for 3 wk. D-xylose test, 15N-Gly trace test and 13C-palmitic acid breath test were done to determine the patients' absorption capability.

RESULTS: Thirty-three patients maintained well body weight and serum albumin concentration. The average time of follow-up for 33 survival patients was 5.9 ± 4.3 years. Twenty-two patients weaned from TPN with an average TPN time of 9.5 ± 6.6 mo. Two patients, whose whole small bowel, ascending and transverse colon were resected received home TPN. An other 9 patients received parenteral or enteral nutritional support partly as well as oral diet. Three week rhGH + GLN therapy increased nutrients absorption but the effects were transient.

CONCLUSION: By rehabilitation therapy, most short bowel patients could wean from parenteral nutrition. Dietary manipulation is an integral part of the treatment of SBS. Treatment with growth hormone and glutamine may increase nutrients absorption but the effects are not sustained beyond the treatment period.




INTRODUCTION

Short-bowel syndrome (SBS) is resulted from extensive small bowel resection due to infarction of the mesenteric vessels, intestinal volvulus, trauma, malignancy, or from complications of Crohn's disease, and is defined as the manifestations of signs, symptoms and complications associated with the inadequate absorptive surface area of functional bowel[1]. It is usually characterized by severe diarrhea, malabsorption, dehydration, electrolyte and metabolic disturbances, and progressive malnourishment.

The pathophysiological consequences following extensive intestinal resection depend on the length and site of resection and the extent of adaptation of the remaining intestine[2-4]. Patients often have to be supported with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) until maximal adaptation of the residual small bowel is complete. This process can take place for up to a year and sometimes longer. Certain patients may require lifelong TPN support depending on the length and health of the residual small bowel. TPN is associated with certain complications, which include catheter sepsis and liver failure[5-8]. It is therefore important for dietary management and pharmacological treatment in the short bowel patients hopefully to wean from TPN. Dietary management and some trophic factors are important in promoting intestinal adaptation after resection. The aim of the study was to define the role of bowel rehabilitation, trophic factors in intestinal adaptation in short bowel patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients

Thirty-eight patients (28 men, 10 women; mean age 38.0 ± 16.0 years, range 7-68 years) with severe short-bowel syndrome were eligible for this study. All patients had previously undergone extensive bowel resection for intestinal volvulus, mesenteric infarction or inflammatory bowel disease with or without colonic resection. The average length of jejunum-ileum, as determined from operative reports and confirmed by perioperative radiographs, was 35.8 ± 21.2 cm (range, 0-110 cm) in all patients. Two patients had entire jejunum, ileum and right colon resected. The ileocecal valve and a portion of colon were resected in 13 patients, and 25 patients had intact colon (Table 1). The patients were clinically stable, and did not demonstrate evidence of infection, or extradigestive organ failure. In addition, they did not have a history of cancer. The protocol for the present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Hospital.

Table 1 Patient characteristics and status.
Patient No.GenderAge (a)Cause of resectionJejunum-ileum (cm)ColonTPN (a)Current statusSurvival time (a)
1F28Small bowel volvulus0ACR17HPN17
2M7Small bowel volvulus0ACR7.6HPN7.6
3M41Small bowel volvulus35All0.8Normal oral diet13.5
4M61SMA thrombosis30All1.6Died2.2
5M62SMA thrombosis30All2.0Died2.6
6M33Small bowel volvulus28All1.2Normal oral diet14.4
7M24Small bowel volvulus18All1.8PN + EN1.8
8M35Small bowel volvulus45All0.5Died6.2
9F52Small bowel volvulus55ICV (-)0.3Died7.4
10F68SMA thrombosis70ICV (-)0.6Normal oral diet9.5
11F44Small bowel obstruction100All0.2Normal oral diet9.6
12M22Crohn’s disease80ICV (-)0.5Normal oral diet12.2
13M15Small bowel volvulus20ICV (-)5.2Died5.4
14M50Small bowel obstruction60ICV (-)1.2Normal oral diet9.0
15F42Small bowel volvulus28All2.2PN + oral diet8.5
16F44Small bowel volvulus35ICV (-)1.0Normal oral diet10.8
17M59Small bowel volvulus30All1.2Normal oral diet6.4
18F50SMA thrombosis60ICV (-)0.4Normal oral diet5.4
19M55SMA thrombosis40ICV (-)1.0Normal oral diet7.6
20M56Small bowel volvulus30All0.8PN + oral diet4.5
21M26Small bowel volvulus30All1.0Normal oral diet8.8
22M40Small bowel obstruction50ICV (-)0.6Normal oral diet6.0
23M16Small bowel volvulus30All1.5Normal oral diet12.5
24M28Small bowel volvulus30All2.0Normal oral diet5.5
25M57SMA thrombosis45All0.3Normal oral diet6.5
26M34Crohn’s disease60All0.5Normal oral diet4.0
27M41Crohn’s disease70All0.4Normal oral diet2.0
28M30Small bowel volvulus40All0.2Normal oral diet1.8
29M62SMA thrombosis50ICV (-)0.8EN + oral diet1.6
30F45Small bowel volvulus30All0.5EN + oral diet1.5
31M18Small bowel volvulus30All0.4Normal oral diet2.0
32M20Small bowel volvulus30All0.5Normal oral diet2.0
33M16Small bowel volvulus20All1.0EN + oral diet1.5
34M36Small bowel volvulus30All0.4EN + oral diet1.2
35M18Small bowel volvulus18All0.6HPN + oral diet2.6
36F46SMA thrombosis40ICV (-)0.5EN + oral diet0.5
37M32Small bowel volvulus35All0.3Normal oral diet1.8
38F30Small bowel volvulus30All0.2Normal oral diet1.0
Mean38 ± 1635.8 ± 21.29.5 ± 6.65.9 ± 4.3
Bowel rehabilitation

Clinical management Massive fluid and electrolyte losses were noted due to transient gastric hypersecretion and profound diarrhea during the initial postoperative periods. So, initial postoperative treatment was designed to maintain adequate fluid and electrolyte balance. TPN began early to attain positive nitrogen balance and to prevent severe weight loss. It should continue until the adaptive processes were complete or indefinitely, if clinically indicated. The composition of TPN was individualized and altered when necessary. Caloric requirements were delivered in accordance with the resting energy expenditure of patients, and it was reassessed often as the patient's clinical condition warranted. As the patient's oral intake increased, the amount of TPN was reduced, the frequency of TPN was reduced to every other day in the first week, three times in the next week, and twice during the third week. If the patient lost 1 kg/week or more or if diarrhea exceeded 600 g/d or if laboratory abnormalities developed, then the patients were placed back on TPN. If the patient's eventual adaptation was insufficient to allow survival on oral/enteral feeding alone, the patients usually required lifelong TPN support.

Patients with SBS received at least some enteral feeding as soon as possible after resection. Usually this was administered for a postoperative period of 7-10 d. The ideal composition of enteral formulas for patients with SBS was also dependent upon the length of the small bowel and the presence of a colon. Originally, elemental and peptide based enteral formulas were favored for patients with SBS. Gradually, the diet with intact protein nutrient formulas and dietary fiber was given in accordance with the patients' need. Meals were distributed throughout the day.

Combined trophic therapy

Eight patients (4 males, 4 females, mean age 36 ± 8 years) with severe SBS (mean jejunoileal length 44 cm, range 0 to 80 cm) who previously adapted to the provision of TPN and enteral feedings were admitted for 0.8 ± 0.5 years in the study after surgical resection. The first week served as a control period when nutritional (parenteral and enteral) and medical managements were delivered as the routine therapy. Thereafter, the patients who received treatment of subcutaneous recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) (0.14 mg/kg•day; Saizen, Serono Co., Switzerland) were divided into two daily injections, intravenous alanyl-glutamine solution (0.3 g/kg•day, Dipeptiven, Fresenius Co., Germany) was delivered daily for 3 wk. D-xylose test, 15N-Gly trace test and 13C-palmitic acid breath test were done respectively before, at the end of therapy and one week after treatment to determine the patients' absorption capability.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using standard statistical software (SPSS 10.0). For normally distributed data, a paired Student's t test was used for statistical analysis. A probability value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were admitted and received nutritional support and rehabilitation therapy, among them 2 died of severe malnutrition 2 years after treatment because they failed to receive nutritional therapy, 2 died of accidental event, 1 died of liver failure 5 years later. Thirty-three patients maintained well body weight and serum albumin concentration. The average time of follow-up for 33 survival patients was 5.9 ± 4.3 years (range, 0.5-17 years). Twenty-two patients weaned from TPN, their average TPN time was 9.5 ± 6.6 mo. They maintained their nutritional status well on normal oral diet. Two patients, whose whole small bowel, ascending and transverse colon were resected received home TPN. An other 9 patients received parenteral or enteral nutritional support partly as well as oral diet (Table 1). Eight patients developed gall bladder stones. Cholecystectomy was performed for three patients.

For the eight patients, the 3 wk rhGH + GLN therapy resulted in weight gain, and stool output dramatically decreased. Three patients weaned from TPN completely after the treatment period, 3 patients reduced TPN requirements, and 2 patients failed the therapy. The absorption capability of D-xylose, 15N-Gly and 13C-palmitic acid in these SBS patients was much lower than normal level. After 3 wk rhGH + GLN therapy, the absorption capability of D-xylose, 15N-Gly and 13C-palmitic acid improved. However, it dropped to the level of baseline at one week after treatment (Table 2).

Table 2 Absorption capability of patients before and after treatment with GH + GLN.
BaselineEnd of therapyOne week after therapy
D-xylose test (%)5.4 ± 2.17.6 ± 1.8a6.0 ± 2.0b
15N-Gly trace test (%)62.4 ± 14.273.2 ± 15.3a58.4 ± 11.8b
13C-palmitic acid breath test (%)55.3 ± 8.864.5 ± 11.2a62.6 ± 10.4b
DISCUSSION

After extensive resection of the small intestine, the remaining bowel, to some degree, had a significant adaptation response to resection. Bowel adaptation, characterized by epithelial hyperplasia and increase in villus diameter, height, and crypt depth, occurred weeks to months after resection[9-11]. Various nutritional and medical therapies can be tried to improve bowel absorptive capacity. TPN is the most important factor responsible for prolonging the lives of patients with SBS. In the initial stages after massive resection of bowel, TPN should begin early to attain positive nitrogen balance and to prevent severe weight loss[12,13]. TPN has been shown to greatly increase the chances of long-term survival. It should be delivered until the adaptive processes were complete or indefinitely, if clinically indicated[14]. This process can take place for up to a year and sometimes longer. Long-term TPN resulted in small bowel mucosa atrophy and was associated with certain complications, such as catheter sepsis and liver failure[15]. So, oral diet is encouraged, if there is any absorptive capacity of the remaining bowel, bowel adaptation should be promoted. An enteral tube feeding might be used to supplement the diet in an effort to wean patients from TPN[16]. At first, diluted solutions of chemically defined diets containing simple amino acids and short-chain peptides were offered. Gradually, the diet with intact protein nutrient formulas and dietary fiber was given in accordance with the patients' need. The parenteral supply had to be adjusted according to the oral intake. As the patient's oral intake increased, the amount of TPN was reduced, the frequency of TPN was reduced to every other day for 1 wk, three times in the next week, and twice during the third week or weaned from TPN at last[17]. If the patient lost or more 1 kg/wk of body weight or more, if diarrhea exceeded 600 g/d or if laboratory abnormalities developed, then the patients were placed back on TPN[18]. In our group, 22 patients weaned from TPN among the 33 survived patients after receiving rehabilitation therapy. They maintained their nutritional status well on normal oral diet. It indicated that rehabilitation therapy for SBS played important roles in the intestinal adaptation.

Combination of glutamine, human recombinant growth hormone has been shown to influence bowel adaptation[19-24]. The study by Byrne et al[25,26] indicated that at one year of follow-up 40% of treated patients were able to reduce or discontinue parenteral nutrition. Patients in the study were also receiving other medical therapy, including medications known to slow down intestinal motility and oral rehydration solutions. It is not clear whether glutamine, growth hormone, diet, or other factors contributed to the favorable outcome. It did not necessarily mean that fluid and nutrients absorption was increased because absorptive studies were not performed. Szkudlarek et al[27] reported in a randomized control study of eight short-bowel patients the combination of growth hormone and glutamine for 28 d did not result in a significant increase in fluid or nutrient absorption. In our clinical trial, we used D-xylose test, 15N-Gly trace test and 13C-palmitic acid breath test to determine the patients' nutrient absorption capability. The results showed that the absorption of carbohydrates (from 5.4% to 7.6%), protein (from 62.4% to 73.2%) and fat (from 55.3% to 64.5%) increased. Weight gain was observed and stool output dramatically decreased. Three patients weaned from TPN completely after the treatment period and 3 patients reduced TPN requirements. However, the absorption capability dropped to the level of baseline at one week after treatment. We found that the treatment with growth hormone and glutamine might increase absorption of nutrients but the effect seemed to be transient with no long term improvement in gut function when treatment was discontinued. This has been supported by recent clinical studies[28-30].

In conclusion, by rehabilitation therapy, most short bowel patients could wean from parenteral nutrition. Dietary manipulation is an integral part of the treatment of SBS. Treatment with growth hormone and glutamine may increase nutrients absorption but the effects are not sustained beyond the treatment period. Therapeutic efficacy can be achieved only when the treatment plan is tailored to meet individual need.

Footnotes

Edited by Zhu LH and Wang XL

References
1.  Thompson JS. Comparison of massive vs repeated resection leading to short bowel syndrome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:101-104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Jeppesen PB, Mortensen PB. Enhancing bowel adaptation in short bowel syndrome. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2002;4:338-347.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Welters CF, Dejong CH, Deutz NE, Heineman E. Intestinal adaptation in short bowel syndrome. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:229-236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Wasa M, Takagi Y, Sando K, Harada T, Okada A. Intestinal adaptation in pediatric patients with short-bowel syndrome. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1999;9:207-209.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Sondheimer JM, Asturias E, Cadnapaphornchai M. Infection and cholestasis in neonates with intestinal resection and long-term parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;27:131-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 199]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 202]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Burstyne M, Jensen GL. Abnormal liver functions as a result of total parenteral nutrition in a patient with short-bowel syndrome. Nutrition. 2000;16:1090-1092.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Terra RM, Plopper C, Waitzberg DL, Cukier C, Santoro S, Martins JR, Song RJ, Gama-Rodrigues J. Remaining small bowel length: Association with catheter sepsis in patients receiving home total parenteral nutrition: evidence of bacterial translocation. World J Surg. 2000;24:1537-1541.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Candusso M, Faraguna D, Sperlì D, Dodaro N. Outcome and quality of life in paediatric home parenteral nutrition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002;5:309-314.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Schulzke JD, Schmitz H, Fromm M, Bentzel CJ, Riecken EO. Clinical models of intestinal adaptation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;859:127-138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Kvietys PR. Intestinal physiology relevant to short-bowel syndrome. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1999;9:196-199.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Welters CF, Dejong CH, Deutz NE, Heineman E. Intestinal function and metabolism in the early adaptive phase after massive small bowel resection in the rat. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:1746-1751.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Platell CF, Coster J, McCauley RD, Hall JC. The management of patients with the short bowel syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:13-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Sundaram A, Koutkia P, Apovian CM. Nutritional management of short bowel syndrome in adults. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;34:207-220.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 114]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 117]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Messing B, Crenn P, Beau P, Boutron-Ruault MC, Rambaud JC, Matuchansky C. Long-term survival and parenteral nutrition dependence in adult patients with the short bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:1043-1050.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 436]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 379]  [Article Influence: 15.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Howard L, Ashley C. Management of complications in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:1651-1661.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 145]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 144]  [Article Influence: 6.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Vanderhoof JA, Matya SM. Enteral and parenteral nutrition in patients with short-bowel syndrome. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1999;9:214-219.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Buchman AL. The clinical management of short bowel syndrome: steps to avoid parenteral nutrition. Nutrition. 1997;13:907-913.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Gouttebel MC, Saint Aubert B, Colette C, Astre C, Monnier LH, Joyeux H. Intestinal adaptation in patients with short bowel syndrome. Measurement by calcium absorption. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:709-715.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Gu Y, Wu ZH. The anabolic effects of recombinant human growth hormone and glutamine on parenterally fed, short bowel rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8:752-757.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Zhou X, Li YX, Li N, Li JS. Effect of bowel rehabilitative therapy on structural adaptation of remnant small intestine: Animal experiment. World J Gastroenterol. 2001;7:66-73.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Ukleja A, Scolapio JS, Buchman AL. Nutritional management of short bowel syndrome. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2002;13:161-168.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Seguy D, Vahedi K, Kapel N, Souberbielle JC, Messing B. Low-dose growth hormone in adult home parenteral nutrition-dependent short bowel syndrome patients: A positive study. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:293-302.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 176]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 183]  [Article Influence: 8.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Li-Ling M. The effectiveness of growth hormone, glutamine and a low-fat diet containing high-carbohydrate on the enhancement of the function of remnant intestine among patients with short bowel syndrome: A review of published trials. Clin Nutr. 2001;20:199-204.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Scolapio JS, Ukleja A. Short-bowel syndrome. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 1998;1:391-394.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Byrne TA, Morrissey TB, Nattakom TV, Ziegler TR, Wilmore DW. Growth hormone, glutamine, and a modified diet enhance nutrient absorption in patients with severe short bowel syndrome. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1995;19:296-302.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 202]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 206]  [Article Influence: 7.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Byrne TA, Persinger RL, Young LS, Ziegler TR, Wilmore DW. A new treatment for patients with short-bowel syndrome. Growth hormone, glutamine, and a modified diet. Ann Surg. 1995;222:243-254; discussion 254-255.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 312]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 271]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Szkudlarek J, Jeppesen PB, Mortensen PB. Effect of high dose growth hormone with glutamine and no change in diet on intestinal absorption in short bowel patients: A randomised, double blind, crossover, placebo controlled study. Gut. 2000;47:199-205.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 152]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 158]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Scolapio JS, McGreevy K, Tennyson GS, Burnett OL. Effect of glutamine in short-bowel syndrome. Clin Nutr. 2001;20:319-323.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 64]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Jeppesen PB, Szkudlarek J, Høy CE, Mortensen PB. Effect of high-dose growth hormone and glutamine on body composition, urine creatinine excretion, fatty acid absorption, and essential fatty acids status in short bowel patients: A randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001;36:48-54.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Scolapio JS. Effect of growth hormone, glutamine, and diet on body composition in short bowel syndrome: A randomized, controlled study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1999;23:309-12; discussion 312-3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]