Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2024; 30(16): 2220-2232
Published online Apr 28, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i16.2220
Drug-induced mucosal alterations observed during esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Masaya Iwamuro, Seiji Kawano, Motoyuki Otsuka, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
ORCID number: Masaya Iwamuro (0000-0002-1757-5754); Seiji Kawano (0000-0002-7807-5147); Motoyuki Otsuka (0000-0003-2869-2881).
Author contributions: Iwamuro M designed the study and wrote the paper; Iwamuro M and Kawano S collected the data; Kawano S and Otsuka M critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content; and Otsuka M approved the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: Iwamuro M has received lecture fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., as well as grants from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Abbott Japan Co., Ltd. Kawano S has received lecture fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Astellas Pharma Inc., AstraZeneca PLC, Viatris Inc., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and EA Pharma Co., Ltd., along with grants from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Abbott Japan Co., Ltd. Otsuka M has received lecture fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, AbbVie GK, EA Pharma Co., Ltd., and Kowa Company, Ltd., along with grants from Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Abbott Japan Co., Ltd.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Masaya Iwamuro, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Doctor, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan. pr145h2k@okayama-u.ac.jp
Received: December 24, 2023
Revised: January 24, 2024
Accepted: April 1, 2024
Published online: April 28, 2024

Abstract

Several features of drug-induced mucosal alterations have been observed in the upper gastrointestinal tract, i.e., the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. These include pill-induced esophagitis, desquamative esophagitis, worsening of gastroesophageal reflux, chemotherapy-induced esophagitis, proton pump inhibitor-induced gastric mucosal changes, medication-induced gastric erosions and ulcers, pseudomelanosis of the stomach, olmesartan-related gastric mucosal inflammation, lanthanum deposition in the stomach, zinc acetate hydrate tablet-induced gastric ulcer, immune-related adverse event gastritis, olmesartan-asso-ciated sprue-like enteropathy, pseudomelanosis of the duodenum, and lanthanum deposition in the duodenum. For endoscopists, acquiring accurate knowledge regarding these diverse drug-induced mucosal alterations is crucial not only for the correct diagnosis of these lesions but also for differential diag-nosis of other conditions. This minireview aims to provide essential information on drug-induced mucosal alterations observed on esophagogastroduodenoscopy, along with representative endoscopic images.

Key Words: Diagnosis, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, Non-neoplastic lesions, Esophageal lesions, Gastric lesions, Duodenal lesions

Core Tip: Various lesions associated with medication use are detected during esophagogastroduodenoscopy, including pill-induced esophagitis, desquamative esophagitis, deteriorating gastroesophageal reflux, chemotherapy-induced esophagitis, proton pump inhibitor-induced gastric mucosal changes, medication-induced gastric erosions and ulcers, pseudomelanosis of the stomach, olmesartan-related gastric mucosal inflammation, lanthanum deposition in the stomach, zinc acetate hydrate tablet-induced gastric lesions, immune-related adverse event gastritis, olmesartan-associated sprue-like enteropathy, duodenal pseudomelanosis, and lanthanum deposition. Endoscopists must diagnose these mucosal alterations by acquiring pertinent knowledge regarding medication-induced lesions, concomitant with inquiries concerning patient medication history.



INTRODUCTION

The primary purpose of screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is to comprehensively examine the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum to detect neoplasms. Furthermore, EGD provides invaluable information for disease diagnosis, assessment of disease state, and treatment planning in symptomatic patients. This procedure can reveal a spectrum of conditions, including cancer, and can also enable the identification of mucosal changes attributed to medications taken by the patient[1,2]. Although gastric and duodenal ulcers caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have long been known as drug-induced upper gastrointestinal lesions[3,4], the advent of various medications on the market has led to the emergence of new types of mucosal injuries and alterations. Despite the inclusion of information on some drug-induced upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions in the package inserts of medications, not all prescribing physicians are acquainted with these conditions due to their infrequency. Therefore, endoscopists should acquire accurate know-ledge regarding diverse drug-induced mucosal alterations for appropriate diagnosis. This knowledge is also crucial for the differential diagnosis of other conditions, including neoplastic lesions. Herein, we review articles associated with drug-induced mucosal alterations in the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, and present endoscopic images of representative lesions detected on EGD.

LITERATURE REVIEW
Search strategy

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed database to retrieve all peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2013, and August 3, 2023, without imposing any study design filters. To augment our search results, we manually screened additional relevant articles using a reference list of selected publications that met our eligibility criteria. Our search used the keywords “drug-induced” and “esophagus”, “stomach”, or “duodenum”, and was performed by the principal investigator Iwamuro M. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Peer-reviewed articles describing cases of drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract lesion; and (2) Review articles, original articles, case series, and case reports. Articles were excluded if they: (1) Did not focus primarily on drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract lesion; (2) Were animal or cell studies; (3) Were letters, editorials, or correction notices; or (4) Were written in languages other than English. All the eligible articles were evaluated.

Search results

Figure 1 presents a flow diagram summarizing the identification, screening, eligibility, and exclusion processes of the literature search. The keywords “drug-induced” and “esophagus” yielded 45 papers of which 19 were excluded for the following reasons: Not primarily focused on drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract lesion (n = 14); animal or cell studies (n = 2); and written in languages other than English (n = 3). The keywords “drug-induced” and “stomach” yielded 173 papers, of which 149 papers were excluded for the following reasons: Not primarily focused on drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract lesion (n = 65); animal or cell studies (n = 72); and studies written in languages other than English (n = 12). The keywords “drug-induced” and “duodenum” yielded 30 articles, of which 19 were excluded due to the following reasons: Not primarily focused on drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract lesion (n = 8); animal or cell studies (n = 8); and studies written in languages other than English (n = 3). Finally, 61 articles were retrieved from the initial PubMed search after applying the exclusion criteria. After a manual screening, 33 additional articles were deemed relevant and included. A total of 94 articles were reviewed in detail.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow diagram summarizing the identification, screening, eligibility, and exclusion processes of the literature search.

Virtually all drugs may cause adverse events, including those involving the digestive tract, and various changes in the gastrointestinal mucosa due to different drugs have been reported. Drugs reported in two or more papers are presented in Table 1. In the subsequent sections, we elucidate the discernible categories of drug-induced mucosal alterations accompanied by illustrative EGD images.

Table 1 Drugs described in two or more papers.
Esophagus

Stomach
Duodenum
NSAIDsWarfarinPPIsOlmesartan
BisphosphonatesDOACsNSAIDsIron tablets
Iron tabletsSSRIsSteroidsDiuretics
DoxycyclineBenzodiazepineBisphosphonatesLanthanum carbonate
TetracyclinePhenytoinIron tablets
CiprofloxacinPinaveriumDoxycycline
ClindamycinAscorbic acidDiuretics
AmoxicillinL-arginineOlmesartan
MetronidazoleOpiatesLanthanum carbonate
Rifaximin5-fluorouracilZinc acetate
Potassium chlorideBleomycinImmune checkpoint inhibitors
AntihypertensivesDactinomycin
NitratesMethotrexate
QuinidineCytarabine
AcetaminophenVincristine
Colchicine
PILL-INDUCED ESOPHAGITIS

Given that tablets are ingested in a supine posture or preceding sleep, accompanied by inadequate water intake, the entrapment of medication within the esophagus may result in the release of deleterious agents, imparting noxious constituents capable of inflicting damage to the esophageal wall. The mucosal injury to the esophagus due to the retention of such medications is also referred to as pill-induced esophagitis[5-19]. Esophageal injury can be caused by over hundred distinct substances consumed in the form of oral pharmaceuticals. Principal contributors include antibiotics, notably tetracycline and doxycycline, along with other agents such as bisphosphonates[20], NSAIDs, potassium chloride[21], and iron pills. Acetaminophen, warfarin, colchicine, ascorbic acid, L-arginine, pinaverium, antihypertensives, and antiarrhythmic agents may also induce esophagitis. These pharmaceutical agents are believed to exert a corrosive effect on the esophageal mucosa, thereby instigating processes that lead to inflammation, irritation, erosion, and ulceration within the esophagus. Pill-induced esophagitis manifests as dysphagia, pain during swallowing, thoracic discomfort, heartburn, and general esophageal irritation. To attenuate the risk of esophageal injury, it is imperative for patients to ingest medications with a copious volume of plain water and concurrently adopt an upright posture (either sitting or standing) for a minimum of 30 min following the intake of the medication.

DESQUAMATIVE ESOPHAGITIS

Desquamative esophagitis, also known as esophagitis dissecans superficialis, or sloughing esophagitis, is an infrequent, unique endoscopic finding characterized by mucosal sloughing into the esophageal lumen. Desquamative esophagitis occurs in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants, which are commonly prescribed for the prevention and treatment of blood clots. While dabigatran is frequently implicated[22-26], rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban can also induce this condition. A typical appearance is depicted in Figure 2, illustrating the presence of diffuse white membranous deposits in the mid to distal esophagus. Endoscopic biopsy of the white membranous deposits reveals a degenerated squamous epithelium accompanied by inflammatory cell infiltration[26]. A previous study found that the use of psychoactive agents, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, was prevalent in patients with desquamative esophagitis[27]. Other medications, such as benzodiazepines, opioids, and antiepileptic agents, similarly contribute to the occurrence of desquamative esophagitis[8,28]. Such esophageal mucosal injuries are believed to occur through a mechanism similar to that of pill-induced esophagitis, in which damage arises from the retention of medication in the esophagus. Therefore, for prevention, it is crucial to take medication with a full glass of water while in an upright position to ensure smooth passage into the stomach.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Dabigatran-induced desquamative esophagitis. A-C: White membranous material is observed in the middle to lower esophagus of a 73-year-old woman taking dabigatran.
WORSENING OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX

In gastroesophageal reflux, the primary precipitant of mucosal injury is the refluxed gastric acid. However, various medications may exacerbate or trigger the onset of gastroesophageal reflux[13,14]. Nitrates such as nitroglycerin are commonly used to treat conditions such as angina by relaxing and dilating blood vessels. This relaxation effect is not specific to the blood vessels in the heart, but also extends to other smooth muscles, including the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), allowing stomach acid to flow back into the esophagus. Calcium channel blockers, anticholinergic medications, sedatives, tranquilizers, and theophylline may also relax the LES and contribute to acid reflux. In symptomatic individuals, it is imperative not only to administer proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), but also to evaluate the potential exacerbating effects of pharmacological agents on gastroesophageal reflux. Therefore, it is important to promptly discontinue or modify medication accordingly.

CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED ESOPHAGITIS

Chemotherapy-induced esophagitis refers to inflammation and irritation of the esophagus, which occurs as a side effect of chemotherapy drugs. These potent medications used to treat cancer can inadvertently damage the esophageal lining, leading to a range of symptoms and complications[8,11,18]. Drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, bleomycin, dactinomycin, methotrexate, cytarabine, and vincristine have been identified as causative agents.

PPI-INDUCED GASTRIC MUCOSAL CHANGE

PPIs, a class of medications that reduce stomach acid production, are commonly prescribed to treat conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcers. Although PPIs are generally regarded as safe with a low incidence of adverse effects, emerging evidence suggests that their long-term use can elicit diverse endoscopic and histopathological alterations in the gastric mucosa[29,30]. These include multiple white and flat elevated lesions, fundic gland polyps, hyperplastic polyps, cobblestone-like mucosa, black spots, and a white globe appearance.

The term “multiple white and flat elevated lesions” was proposed in 2011 to describe a new type of polyp associated with PPI use that was observed in the gastric cardia, fornix, or corpus[31-34] (Figure 3A-C). These lesions manifest as circumscribed and sharply demarcated areas characterized by a whitish appearance, exhibiting a round morphology and slight elevation of the mucosa with a smooth surface. Multiple white and flat elevated lesions were more easily identified on narrow band imaging than on normal white-light observation. Pathologically, a straight, enlarged, and hyperplastic foveolar epithelium was observed, which is a typical feature of this lesion.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Proton pump inhibitor-induced gastric mucosal changes. A-C: Multiple white and flat elevated lesions. Whitish slight elevations are observed in the gastric fornix of a patient taking proton pump inhibitor (PPI). Lesions are easily identified on narrow-band imaging observation (C); D and E: Fundic gland polyps in a PPI user. After indigo carmine dye spraying (E); F-H: Hyperplastic polyps in the stomach. Multiple reddish, friable, long polyps are seen.

Fundic gland polyps are one of the most prevalent types of gastric polyps, with an estimated incidence ranging from approximately 2% to 11%, albeit subject to variation among diverse populations (Figure 3D and E)[35]. Notably, their occurrence tends to diminish in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, but conversely increases in individuals undergoing PPI therapy. Fundic gland polyps reportedly regress after cessation of PPIs in some patients[36-40].

Several studies have explored the potential association between PPI use and the development of hyperplastic polyps in the stomach (Figure 3F-H). Some studies suggest that the long-term use of PPIs may be associated with an increased risk of gastric polyps[41]. The frequency of hyperplastic polyps exhibited a propensity for elevation among individuals testing positive for Helicobacter pylori. Similar to fundic gland polyps, hyperplastic polyps reportedly regress in some patients following the discontinuation of PPIs[36,42].

Cobblestone-like mucosa refers to the manifestation of numerous, approximately 3-5 mm-sized, irregular, elevated mucosal lesions in the gastric body[34,43,44] (Figure 4A-C). This distinctive mucosal pattern has a similar coloration as that of contiguous mucosa and is typically discerned as interspersed among the gastric folds. This represents a histopathological alteration attributable to prolonged PPI use. The histopathological characterization of the cobblestone-like mucosa involves the presence of parietal cell protrusions and cystic dilatation of the fundic glands, with these changes particularly accentuated in non-atrophic gastric regions.

Figure 4
Figure 4 Proton pump inhibitor-induced gastric mucosal changes. A-C: Cobblestone-like mucosa. Numerous, approximately 3-5 mm-sized, elevated mucosal lesions are seen in the gastric body of a proton pump inhibitor user. After indigo carmine dye spraying (B and C); D and E: Black spots. Dark, dot-like spots are observed in the gastric body; F and G: White globe appearance. A small, round, white deposit observed during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Magnifying endoscopic observation with blue laser imaging emphasized the lesion (G).

Prolonged usage of PPIs induces the formation of black spots in the gastric mucosa, which are discerned as diminutive, dark, dot-like lesions on EGD (Figure 4D and E)[45]. Histopathologically, these spots are characterized by the entrapment of brownish substances within the dilated lumina of the expanded fundic gland cysts. The cystic dilatation of fundic gland cysts induced by the use of PPIs is strongly posited as a key etiological factor contributing to the development of black spots.

The term “white globe appearance” is defined as a small (≤ 1 mm) white globe-shaped feature located beneath the gastric epithelium, observed during magnifying endoscopic observation with narrow band imaging[46]. This feature is associated with early gastric cancers and is often detected near the demarcation line. It indicates cancers with a differentiated component. Conversely, a white globe appearance has also been noted in the gastric mucosa of non-cancer patients with autoimmune gastritis or during PPI use[47,48] (Figure 4F and G).

MEDICATION-INDUCED GASTRIC EROSIONS AND ULCERS

Gastric mucosal damage caused by NSAIDs has long been recognized. The mechanism involves several complex interactions[1,3,4,49]. NSAIDs inhibit cyclooxygenase and subsequently reduce the synthesis of prostaglandins, which play a protective role in maintaining the integrity of the gastric mucosa. NSAIDs cause vasoconstriction and thereby reduce the blood flow, which compromises the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the gastric mucosa, resulting in mucosal damage. Some NSAIDs have direct toxic effects on the gastric mucosa. Epidemiological investigations have shown that the relative risk for the development of gastrointestinal complications escalates in patients concomitantly administered with corticosteroids and NSAIDs[50,51]. Similar to pill-induced esophagitis, bisphosphonates, iron tablets, and doxycycline directly irritate the gastric mucosa due to the chemical properties of the drug and its direct contact with the lining of the stomach.

PSEUDOMELANOSIS OF THE STOMACH

Pseudomelanosis is an infrequent and benign pathological condition in which a dark pigment accumulates within macrophages located in the lamina propria. Unlike melanosis coli, the onset of gastric pseudomelanosis is unrelated to laxative use, but is thought to be associated with diuretics, beta-blockers, and iron supplementation. While gastric pseudomelanosis induces alterations in mucosal coloration, patients are devoid of accompanying clinical symptoms and do not manifest mucosal damage such as erosions or ulcers[52-55]. Deemed a benign condition, a diagnosis of gastric pseudomelanosis does not necessarily mandate any modification in the prescribed medication.

OLMESARTAN-RELATED GASTRIC MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION

Olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist commonly used to treat hypertension, induces enteropathy with sprue-like symptoms. Although infrequent, olmesartan has been reported to induce lymphocytic, collagenous, or chronic gastritis[18,56-59].

LANTHANUM DEPOSITION IN THE STOMACH

Lanthanum carbonate is used for the therapeutic management of hyperphosphatemia, primarily in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. White lesions are characteristic endoscopic features indicative of gastric lanthanum deposition[60-67]. These whitish deposits are easily discernible through narrow band or blue laser imaging. We have elucidated that the endoscopic manifestations of gastric lanthanum deposition vary between mucosa with and without atrophy. In non-atrophic mucosa, lanthanum was initially deposited on the posterior wall to the greater curvature of the gastric body, presenting as diffuse white lesions, the extent of which increased over time (Figure 5A and B). The susceptibility of the posterior wall to the greater curvature of the gastric body suggests that the active ingredient of the orally ingested lanthanum remains in prolonged contact with this region. Conversely, in atrophic mucosa, particularly with intestinal metaplasia, lanthanum deposition manifested as circular or granular white lesions (Figure 5C and D), and the extent of lanthanum deposition increased concurrently with the expansion of the intestinal metaplasia. The increased permeability of lanthanum in areas with intestinal metaplasia compared to that in normal mucosa may facilitate its deposition on the gastric mucosa. We speculate that the multifocal occurrence and mosaic-like distribution of intestinal metaplasia result in the circular or granular appearance of lanthanum deposition. Confirming a history of ingestion of lanthanum carbonate is essential for diagnosing this condition.

Figure 5
Figure 5 Lanthanum deposition in the stomach. A and B: Lanthanum deposition shows diffuse white lesions in non-atrophic mucosa. Magnifying observation with narrow-band imaging reveals tiny whitish depositions within the gastric mucosa (B); C and D: Multiple circular white lesions are seen in the gastric antrum with atrophic change. Magnifying observation with narrow-band imaging of the circular white lesions (D).

The pathological significance of lanthanum deposition in the human gastric mucosa remains unclear. To date, there have been no reports of health impairments associated with gastric lanthanum deposition, suggesting that the diagnosis of gastric lanthanum deposition does not necessarily mandate the discontinuation of lanthanum carbonate intake. However, the long-term prognosis of this condition is currently unknown, and ongoing follow-up of individual cases is desirable.

ZINC ACETATE HYDRATE TABLET-INDUCED GASTRIC LESIONS

Zinc acetate tablets are used to treat zinc deficiency and Wilson’s disease. We found that approximately two-thirds of the patients subjected to oral administration of zinc acetate tablets manifested gastric mucosal injuries characterized by mucosal erythema, erosions, white patches, and ulcers[68] (Figure 6). Localization occurred predominantly in the middle third region, followed by the upper third region. Owing to the potential occurrence of hemorrhagic gastric ulcers, patients undergoing oral administration of zinc acetate hydrate should be monitored for gastric mucosal damage.

Figure 6
Figure 6 Zinc acetate hydrate tablet-induced gastric lesions. A 73-year-old Japanese woman had been taking zinc acetate dihydrate tablets for eight months to treat dysgeusia and hypozincemia. A: A round erosion with adhesion of the white coat is observed; B: Linear erosions are also seen in the gastric body (arrow); C: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed two months after cessation of zinc acetate hydrate tablet shows a resolution of erosions.
IRAE GASTRITIS

Immune checkpoint inhibitors can alleviate T-cell deactivation by reinstating the immune response against tumor cells. However, systemic activation of immune cells simultaneously induces self-reactive T cells in organs other than the tumor, potentially leading to the onset of immune-related adverse event (irAE) in various organs. Among the immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal injuries, irAE colitis is well recognized[69]. Although the incidence of irAE gastritis is presumed to be lower than that of irAE colitis, endoscopic features of erythema, white exudates, and friable mucosa have been documented (Figure 7)[70-77]. The destruction of the glandular structure is visible upon magnifying observation with narrow band imaging[78]. If such lesions are observed after the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the possibility of irAE gastritis should be considered. In irAEs, the prompt cessation of the causative agent does not consistently lead to rapid symptom amelioration and often necessitates the administration of steroids.

Figure 7
Figure 7 Immune-related adverse events gastritis. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy images after 16 wk of pembrolizumab administration in a 57-year-old female. A: White exudate and coarse mucosa are observed in the gastric body; B: Magnifying observation with narrow-band imaging shows that the glandular structures are absent.
OLMESARTAN-ASSOCIATED SPRUE-LIKE ENTEROPATHY

Olmesartan-associated sprue-like enteropathy denotes a condition associated with the usage of olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker. Sprue-like enteropathy is characterized by symptoms resembling those of celiac disease, such as chronic diarrhea, weight loss, and malabsorption of nutrients. Unlike in celiac disease, these symptoms persist even with a gluten-free diet. Villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia, and inflammation are discernible in biopsied specimens[79-81]. Consequently, if a patient presents with persistent diarrhea, weight loss, and malabsorption, particularly when using olmesartan, duodenal biopsy, along with EGD, is essential for the evaluation of these characteristic pathological features and for diagnosis. Discontinuation of olmesartan typically resolves the symptoms and mucosal changes.

PSEUDOMELANOSIS OF THE DUODENUM

A black to dark brown pigmentation can be observed in the duodenum, termed duodenal pseudomelanosis (Figure 8)[54,82-85]. This condition is often observed in patients with chronic diseases such as hypertension, chronic kidney failure, and diabetes. A history of oral iron supplementation, antihypertensive agents (hydralazine), diuretics (thiazides, furosemide), and beta-blockers was noted in most cases. As mentioned in the section on gastric pseudomelanosis, this condition is considered benign and a change in oral medications is not necessarily required.

Figure 8
Figure 8 Pseudomelanosis of the duodenum. A-C: A dark brown pigmentation is observed in the duodenal bulb. Narrow-band imaging (C).
LANTHANUM DEPOSITION IN THE DUODENUM

Lanthanum deposition in the duodenum refers to the accumulation of lanthanum in patients with chronic kidney disease taking lanthanum carbonate as a phosphate binder to treat elevated phosphate levels. The representative endoscopic feature is the presence of whitish discoloration of the villi, displaying numerous pinpoint or dot-like white deposits (Figure 9)[86-88]. Although this discoloration is a notable finding, the clinical significance of lanthanum deposition in the duodenum is still not fully understood, and its presence does not necessarily indicate pathology or adverse effects.

Figure 9
Figure 9 Lanthanum deposition in the duodenum. A: The duodenal mucosa is whitish; B: Magnifying observation reveals numerous dot-like white deposits in the duodenal villi; C: Magnifying observation with blue laser imaging emphasized the white deposits.
CONCLUSION

Diagnosing drug-induced mucosal alterations in the upper gastrointestinal tract is important for several reasons. First, in cases where a specific drug is identified as causing alterations in the esophageal, gastric, and duodenal mucosa, reassessment of treatment strategies is imperative. Discontinuation of the causative medication is generally recommended for patients presenting with symptoms or displaying evident mucosal damage, such as ulcers. If discontinuation of the causative agent proves challenging, dose reduction or transitioning to a medication with similar effects should be considered. Additionally, in the presence of lesions such as ulcers or erosions, acid-suppressing agents and mucosal protective agents may be administered. Second, establishing a diagnosis enables discerning whether gastrointestinal symptoms are attributable to a particular drug, prevents unnecessary examinations aimed at excluding other diseases, and facilitates the identification of appropriate interventions. In conclusion, the diagnosis of drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract lesion is crucial for ensuring patient safety and facilitating appropriate medical management. Understanding the characteristic endoscopic images presented in this paper and conducting a thorough diagnosis will enable the implementation of suitable treatments and preventive measures.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country/Territory of origin: Japan

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Liu C, China S-Editor: Wang JJ L-Editor: A P-Editor: Chen YX

References
1.  Bordin DS, Livzan MA, Gaus OV, Mozgovoi SI, Lanas A. Drug-Associated Gastropathy: Diagnostic Criteria. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Joo MK, Park CH, Kim JS, Park JM, Ahn JY, Lee BE, Lee JH, Yang HJ, Cho YK, Bang CS, Kim BJ, Jung HK, Kim BW, Lee YC; Korean College of Helicobacter Upper Gastrointestinal Research. Clinical Guidelines for Drug-Related Peptic Ulcer, 2020 Revised Edition. Gut Liver. 2020;14:707-726.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Nguyen TNM, Sha S, Chen LJ, Holleczek B, Brenner H, Schöttker B. Strongly increased risk of gastric and duodenal ulcers among new users of low-dose aspirin: results from two large cohorts with new-user design. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022;56:251-262.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Bjarnason I, Scarpignato C, Holmgren E, Olszewski M, Rainsford KD, Lanas A. Mechanisms of Damage to the Gastrointestinal Tract From Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:500-514.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 236]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 242]  [Article Influence: 40.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Bordea MA, Pirvan A, Sarban C, Margescu C, Leucuta D, Samasca G, Miu N. Pill -Induced Erosive Esophagitis in Children. Clujul Med. 2014;87:15-18.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Abdi S, Masbough F, Nazari M, Abbasinazari M. Drug-induced esophagitis and helpful management for healthcare providers. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2022;15:219-224.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Hu SW, Chen AC, Wu SF. Drug-Induced Esophageal Ulcer in Adolescent Population: Experience at a Single Medical Center in Central Taiwan. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Mastracci L, Grillo F, Parente P, Unti E, Battista S, Spaggiari P, Campora M, Valle L, Fassan M, Fiocca R. Non gastro-esophageal reflux disease related esophagitis: an overview with a histologic diagnostic approach. Pathologica. 2020;112:128-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Gore RM, Levine MS.   Diseases of the Upper GI Tract. 2018 Mar 21. In: Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis 2018-2021: Diagnostic Imaging - IDKD Book [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2018–.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Panarelli NC. Other Forms of Esophagitis: It Is Not Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, So Now What Do I Do? Surg Pathol Clin. 2017;10:765-779.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Grossi L, Ciccaglione AF, Marzio L. Esophagitis and its causes: Who is "guilty" when acid is found "not guilty"? World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:3011-3016.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
12.  McGettigan MJ, Menias CO, Gao ZJ, Mellnick VM, Hara AK. Imaging of Drug-induced Complications in the Gastrointestinal System. Radiographics. 2016;36:71-87.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Domagała-Rodacka R, Cibor D, Szczeklik K, Rodacki T, Mach T, Owczarek D. Gastrointestinal tract as a side-effect target of medications. Przegl Lek. 2016;73:652-658.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Drug-induced lesions of the oesophageal mucosa. Prescrire Int. 2015;24:210-211, 213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Kim SH, Jeong JB, Kim JW, Koh SJ, Kim BG, Lee KL, Chang MS, Im JP, Kang HW, Shin CM. Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of drug-induced esophagitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:10994-10999.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
16.  Dağ MS, Öztürk ZA, Akın I, Tutar E, Çıkman Ö, Gülşen MT. Drug-induced esophageal ulcers: case series and the review of the literature. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2014;25:180-184.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Almashat SJ, Duan L, Goldsmith JD. Non-reflux esophagitis: a review of inflammatory diseases of the esophagus exclusive of reflux esophagitis. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2014;31:89-99.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Allard FD, Stelow EB. Review of Drug-induced Injury in Mucosal Biopsies From the Tubular Gastrointestinal Tract. Adv Anat Pathol. 2019;26:151-170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Kwak HA, Hart J. The Many Faces of Medication-Related Injury in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Surg Pathol Clin. 2017;10:887-908.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Costa MS, Gravito-Soares E, Gravito-Soares M, Figueiredo P. Severe drug-induced oesophagitis in a young male patient. BMJ Case Rep. 2022;15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Maesaka K, Tsujii Y, Shinzaki S, Yoshii S, Hayashi Y, Iijima H, Nakamoto K, Ohtani T, Sakata Y, Takehara T. Successful treatment of drug-induced esophageal ulcer in a patient with chronic heart failure: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e13380.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Araki T, Hayashi K, Sonoda Y, Honda T, Imamura Y, Koide Y, Hamada H, Nakao K. Dabigatran-induced esophagitis with full circumferential blue pigmentation. DEN Open. 2024;4:e271.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Lin S, Wang Y, Zhang L, Guan W. Dabigatran must be used carefully: literature review and recommendations for management of adverse events. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:1527-1533.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Cuadros Martínez M, Froilán Torres C, Gonzalo Bada N. Symptomatic exfoliative esophagitis induced by dabigatran. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018;110:743-744.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Zhou Y, Su Y, Li Z, Wu C, Sun W, Wang C. Analysis of the clinical characteristics of dabigatran-induced oesophagitis. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023;30:e24-e28.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Toya Y, Nakamura S, Tomita K, Matsuda N, Abe K, Abiko Y, Orikasa S, Akasaka R, Chiba T, Uesugi N, Sugai T, Matsumoto T. Dabigatran-induced esophagitis: The prevalence and endoscopic characteristics. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31:610-614.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Hart PA, Romano RC, Moreira RK, Ravi K, Sweetser S. Esophagitis Dissecans Superficialis: Clinical, Endoscopic, and Histologic Features. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:2049-2057.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 66]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Purdy JK, Appelman HD, McKenna BJ. Sloughing esophagitis is associated with chronic debilitation and medications that injure the esophageal mucosa. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:767-775.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 81]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Shinozaki S, Osawa H, Hayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Miura Y, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. Changes in gastric morphology during long-term use of vonoprazan compared to proton pump inhibitors. Singapore Med J. 2022;63:283-287.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Kim GH. Proton Pump Inhibitor-Related Gastric Mucosal Changes. Gut Liver. 2021;15:646-652.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Adachi K, Mishiro T, Okada M, Kinoshita Y. Prevalence of Multiple White and Flat Elevated Lesions in Individuals Undergoing a Medical Checkup. Intern Med. 2018;57:1213-1218.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Hasegawa R, Yao K, Kanemitsu T, Arima H, Hirase T, Hiratsuka Y, Takeda K, Imamura K, Ohtsu K, Ono Y, Miyaoka M, Hisabe T, Ueki T, Tanabe H, Ohta A, Nimura S. Association between occurrence of multiple white and flat elevated gastric lesions and oral proton pump inhibitor intake. Clin Endosc. 2024;57:65-72.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Majima K, Muraki Y, Shimamoto T. Multiple White and Flat Elevated Lesions Observed in the Stomach: A Prospective Study of Clinical Characteristics and Risk Factors. Intern Med. 2018;57:2613-2619.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Kiso M, Ito M, Boda T, Kotachi T, Masuda K, Hata K, Sasaki A, Kawamura T, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S, Chayama K. Endoscopic findings of the gastric mucosa during long-term use of proton pump inhibitor - a multicenter study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:828-832.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Martin FC, Chenevix-Trench G, Yeomans ND. Systematic review with meta-analysis: fundic gland polyps and proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44:915-925.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Iwamuro M, Shiraha H, Okada H. Gastric polyps' regression after potassium-competitive acid blocker cessation. J Gen Fam Med. 2022;23:358-359.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Tanaka M, Kataoka H, Yagi T. Proton-pump inhibitor-induced fundic gland polyps with hematemesis. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2019;12:193-195.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Takeda T, Asaoka D, Tajima Y, Matsumoto K, Takeda N, Hiromoto T, Okubo S, Saito H, Aoyama T, Shibuya T, Sakamoto N, Hojo M, Osada T, Nagahara A, Yao T, Watanabe S. Hemorrhagic polyps formed like fundic gland polyps during long-term proton pump inhibitor administration. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2017;10:478-484.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Fukuda M, Ishigaki H, Sugimoto M, Mukaisho KI, Matsubara A, Ishida H, Moritani S, Itoh Y, Sugihara H, Andoh A, Ogasawara K, Murakami K, Kushima R. Histological analysis of fundic gland polyps secondary to PPI therapy. Histopathology. 2019;75:537-545.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Ochiai Y, Kikuchi D, Ito S, Takazawa Y, Hoteya S. Large Fundic Gland Polyp Associated with Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Administration Mimicking Gastric-Type Neoplasm. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2021;15:123-130.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Hongo M, Fujimoto K; Gastric Polyps Study Group. Incidence and risk factor of fundic gland polyp and hyperplastic polyp in long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy: a prospective study in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:618-624.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 81]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Nikaido M, Miyamoto S, Utsumi T, Shimizu T, Nakanishi Y, Kumagai K, Teramura M, Setoyama T, Seno H. Gastric Hyperplastic Polyps Can Shrink After Discontinuation of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Case Series Compared With Continuation of Proton Pump Inhibitors. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022;56:e216-e221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Hatano Y, Haruma K, Kamada T, Shiotani A, Takahari K, Matsumoto M, Uchida O. Factors Associated with Gastric Black Spot, White Flat Elevated Mucosa, and Cobblestone-Like Mucosa: A Cross-Sectional Study. Digestion. 2018;98:185-193.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Takahari K, Haruma K, Ohtani H, Kiyoto S, Watanabe A, Kamada T, Manabe N, Hatano Y. Proton Pump Inhibitor Induction of Gastric Cobblestone-like Lesions in the Stomach. Intern Med. 2017;56:2699-2703.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Hatano Y, Haruma K, Ayaki M, Kamada T, Ohtani H, Murao T, Manabe N, Mori H, Masaki T, Shiotani A. Black Spot, a Novel Gastric Finding Potentially Induced by Proton Pump Inhibitors. Intern Med. 2016;55:3079-3084.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Doyama H, Yoshida N, Tsuyama S, Ota R, Takeda Y, Nakanishi H, Tsuji K, Tominaga K, Tsuji S, Takemura K, Yamada S, Katayanagi K, Kurumaya H, Iwashita A, Yao K. The "white globe appearance" (WGA): a novel marker for a correct diagnosis of early gastric cancer by magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI). Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E120-E124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Iwamuro M, Tanaka T, Kanzaki H, Kawano S, Kawahara Y, Okada H. Two Cases of White Globe Appearance in Autoimmune Atrophic Gastritis. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2018;2018:7091520.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Miwa W, Hiratsuka T, Sato K, Fujino T, Kato Y. Marked reduction in the number of white globe appearance lesions in the noncancerous stomach after exchanging vonoprazan for esomeprazole treatment: a follow-up case report. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2021;14:1046-1051.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Cheng H, Huang H, Guo Z, Chang Y, Li Z. Role of prostaglandin E2 in tissue repair and regeneration. Theranostics. 2021;11:8836-8854.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 25.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Piper JM, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Griffin MR. Corticosteroid use and peptic ulcer disease: role of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:735-740.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 425]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 358]  [Article Influence: 10.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Aalykke C, Lauritsen K. Epidemiology of NSAID-related gastroduodenal mucosal injury. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;15:705-722.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Ibrahim M, Herman M. A Rare Finding of Gastric Pseudomelanosis in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Case Report. Cureus. 2023;15:e38933.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Qureshi NU, Younus MF, Alavi K, Sheikh MY. Gastric and Duodenal Pseudomelanosis: An Extended Unusual Finding in a Patient with End Stage Kidney Disease. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2016;2016:2861086.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
54.  Wael Mohamed M, Althahabi R, Abubaker F, Sharif O. An Incidental Finding of Gastric and Duodenal Pseudomelanosis: A Case Report. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2022;16:264-269.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Samiullah S, Bhurgri H, Babar A, Samad F, Choudhary MM, Demyen M. Peppered and rare - Gastric and Duodenal Pseudomelanosis: A case series. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33:757-760.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Seminerio J, McGrath K, Arnold CA, Voltaggio L, Singhi AD. Medication-associated lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:140-150.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Ma C, Park JY, Montgomery EA, Arnold CA, McDonald OG, Liu TC, Salaria SN, Limketkai BN, McGrath KM, Musahl T, Singhi AD. A Comparative Clinicopathologic Study of Collagenous Gastritis in Children and Adults: The Same Disorder With Associated Immune-mediated Diseases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:802-812.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Rubio-Tapia A, Herman ML, Ludvigsson JF, Kelly DG, Mangan TF, Wu TT, Murray JA. Severe spruelike enteropathy associated with olmesartan. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:732-738.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 319]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 280]  [Article Influence: 23.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Shenbagaraj L, Swift G. Olmesartan-associated severe gastritis and enteropathy. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Iwamuro M, Urata H, Tanaka T, Okada H. Review of the diagnosis of gastrointestinal lanthanum deposition. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26:1439-1449.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Goto K, Ogawa K. Lanthanum Deposition Is Frequently Observed in the Gastric Mucosa of Dialysis Patients With Lanthanum Carbonate Therapy: A Clinicopathologic Study of 13 Cases, Including 1 Case of Lanthanum Granuloma in the Colon and 2 Nongranulomatous Gastric Cases. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016;24:89-92.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Rothenberg ME, Araya H, Longacre TA, Pasricha PJ. Lanthanum-Induced Gastrointestinal Histiocytosis. ACG Case Rep J. 2015;2:187-189.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Haratake J, Yasunaga C, Ootani A, Shimajiri S, Matsuyama A, Hisaoka M. Peculiar histiocytic lesions with massive lanthanum deposition in dialysis patients treated with lanthanum carbonate. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:767-771.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Hoda RS, Sanyal S, Abraham JL, Everett JM, Hundemer GL, Yee E, Lauwers GY, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Misdraji J. Lanthanum deposition from oral lanthanum carbonate in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Histopathology. 2017;70:1072-1078.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Yasunaga C, Haratake J, Ohtani A. Specific Accumulation of Lanthanum Carbonate in the Gastric Mucosal Histiocytes in a Dialysis Patient. Ther Apher Dial. 2015;19:622-624.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Nishida S, Ota K, Hattori K, Iwatsubo T, Kawaguchi S, Kojima Y, Takeuchi T, Maeda T, Sakaguchi M, Higuchi K. Investigation of the clinical significance and pathological features of lanthanum deposition in the gastric mucosa. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020;20:396.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Yabuki K, Haratake J, Hisaoka M. Lanthanum Deposition in the Gastroduodenal Mucosa of Dialysis Patients. J UOEH. 2019;41:387-395.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Iwamuro M, Tanaka T, Kuraoka S, Hamada K, Abe M, Kono Y, Kanzaki H, Kawano S, Kawahara Y, Okada H. Zinc Acetate Dihydrate Tablet-associated Gastric Lesions. Intern Med. 2022;61:1931-1938.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Xiang Z, Li J, Zhang Z, Cen C, Chen W, Jiang B, Meng Y, Wang Y, Berglund B, Zhai G, Wu J. Comprehensive Evaluation of Anti-PD-1, Anti-PD-L1, Anti-CTLA-4 and Their Combined Immunotherapy in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:883655.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Yip RHL, Lee LH, Schaeffer DF, Horst BA, Yang HM. Lymphocytic gastritis induced by pembrolizumab in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2018;28:645-647.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Rao BB, Robertson S, Philpott J. Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Hemorrhagic Gastritis with Pembrolizumab. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Gonzalez RS, Salaria SN, Bohannon CD, Huber AR, Feely MM, Shi C. PD-1 inhibitor gastroenterocolitis: case series and appraisal of 'immunomodulatory gastroenterocolitis'. Histopathology. 2017;70:558-567.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 143]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 136]  [Article Influence: 17.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  Ferrian S, Liu CC, McCaffrey EF, Kumar R, Nowicki TS, Dawson DW, Baranski A, Glaspy JA, Ribas A, Bendall SC, Angelo M. Multiplexed imaging reveals an IFN-γ-driven inflammatory state in nivolumab-associated gastritis. Cell Rep Med. 2021;2:100419.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Rovedatti L, Lenti MV, Vanoli A, Feltri M, De Grazia F, Di Sabatino A. Nivolumab-associated active neutrophilic gastritis. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73:605-606.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Obeidat A, Silangcruz K, Kozai L, Wien E, Fujiwara Y, Nishimura Y. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Gastritis Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Scoping Review. J Immunother. 2022;45:363-369.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Iwamuro M, Tanaka T, Kono Y, Kawano S, Okada H. Multiple White Plaques in the Esophagus: A Possible Case of Esophageal Mucosal Alteration Associated With Immune-Related Adverse Events of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cureus. 2022;14:e32710.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Nishimura Y, Yasuda M, Ocho K, Iwamuro M, Yamasaki O, Tanaka T, Otsuka F. Severe Gastritis after Administration of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab. Case Rep Oncol. 2018;11:549-556.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Johncilla M, Grover S, Zhang X, Jain D, Srivastava A. Morphological spectrum of immune check-point inhibitor therapy-associated gastritis. Histopathology. 2020;76:531-539.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 12.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
79.  Bashari DR. Severe Sprue-Like Enteropathy and Colitis due to Olmesartan: Lessons Learned From a Rare Entity. Gastroenterology Res. 2020;13:150-154.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
80.  Santos-Antunes J, Coelho R, Cardoso H, Macedo G. Drug-induced small-bowel mucosal atrophy. Endoscopy. 2015;47 Suppl 1 UCTN:E8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
81.  Nielsen JA, Steephen A, Lewin M. Angiotensin-II inhibitor (olmesartan)-induced collagenous sprue with resolution following discontinuation of drug. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6928-6930.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
82.  Oduru O, Jo Gumm A, Sigurdsson L, Cook S, O'Connell DM. Pseudomelanosis Duodeni in a Child With Chronic Diarrhea. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023;76:e45.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
83.  Kanda N, Izumi Y. A case of pseudomelanosis duodeni that disappeared after discontinuation of iron pills. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;97:597-598.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
84.  Cheema HI, Raghavapuram S, Boston I, Augustine T, Tharian B. A Case of Duodenal "Spot" Diagnosis. Cureus. 2022;14:e25500.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
85.  Lopez G, D'Ercole M, Ferrero S, Croci GA. Duodenal Pseudomelanosis: A Literature Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
86.  Ching D, Houghton D, Slim Z, Kumarasinghe MP. Duodenal pigment deposition in a patient with chronic renal failure. Pathology. 2020;52:729-731.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
87.  Iwamuro M, Urata H, Tanaka T, Kawano S, Kawahara Y, Okada H. Frequent Involvement of the Duodenum with Lanthanum Deposition: A Retrospective Observational Study. Intern Med. 2019;58:2283-2289.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
88.  Iwamuro M, Tanaka T, Urata H, Kimoto K, Okada H. Lanthanum phosphate deposition in the duodenum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:1103-1104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]