Clinical Trials Study Open Access
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2014; 20(36): 13172-13177
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13172
Negative methylation status of Vimentin predicts improved prognosis in pancreatic carcinoma
Yi-Feng Zhou, Xia Wang, Jing-Jing Xiang, Xiao-Feng Zhang, Department of Digestive Medicine, The First People’s Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang Province, China
Yi-Feng Zhou, Jin-Shan Sun, Zhao-Shen Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University of Chinese PLA, Shanghai 200433, China
Wei Xu, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Splenic Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of the Logistics University of the Chinese People’s Armed Police Force, Tianjin 300162, China
Author contributions: Zhou YF and Xu W performed the majority of the experiments; Wang X, Sun JS and Xiang JJ collected the clinical samples; Zhang XF performed the statistical analysis; Li ZS and Zhang XF designed the study and wrote the manuscript; Zhou YF and Xu W contributed equally to this work.
Supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China, No. 81001078
Correspondence to: Dr. Xiao-Feng Zhang, Department of Digestive Medicine, The First People’s Hospital of Hangzhou, Huansha Road 261, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang Province, China. zxf837@tom.com
Telephone: +86-571-56008888 Fax: +86-571-87914773
Received: April 7, 2014
Revised: June 8, 2014
Accepted: June 26, 2014
Published online: September 28, 2014

Abstract

AIM: To determine the existence of a potential relationship between the methylation state of the Vimentin gene and its prognostic value in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS: Sixty-four primary tumor specimens and normal tissues were collected consecutively from pancreatic cancer patients during surgery at Hangzhou First People’s Hospital and Affiliated Hospital of the Logistics University of the Chinese People’s Armed Police Force. DNA was extracted from the samples and subsequently quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the Vimentin methylation status of the samples. All of the patients were followed up to December 2012. χ2 test, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression statistical models were used.

RESULTS: Out of 64 pancreatic cancer tissues, 21 were marked as Vimentin methylation-positive, and 43 were marked as Vimentin methylation-negative. The location of pancreatic carcinoma was related to the Vimentin methylation state. The pathological T staging (P < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.003) and the Vimentin methylation state (P = 0.037) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION: In our study, Vimentin methylation status can predict the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients. However, additional experiments and clinical trials are needed to accurately validate this observation.

Key Words: Vimentin, Methylation, Pancreatic carcinoma, Prognosis

Core tip: Vimentin is reported to be an important mesenchymal marker, and plays an important role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in malignant tumors with regard to cellular adhesion, migration and signaling. In our study, we found that pathological T staging (P < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.003) and the Vimentin gene methylation state (P = 0.037) were independent prognostic factors. However, additional experiments and clinical trials are needed to accurately validate this observation.



INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies in humans, wherein the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%[1,2]. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage of disease because of the lack of easily observable symptoms[3]. As reported, only 20% of pancreatic cancer patients are determined as suitable candidates to be considered for surgical resection. Moreover, following surgery, the 5-year survival rate of pancreatic cancer patients is approximately only 15%-25% due to the high recurrence and metastatic rates[4,5]. In the advanced stage of disease, the prognosis for these patients remains poor, even after chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The median overall survival rate is 3-6 mo for patients with metastatic disease and 6-10 mo for patients with non-metastatic disease[6,7]. Thus, early detection of pancreatic cancer is clearly important in order to augment the potential benefits and rates of an operation, and the prognosis of the patients. Recently, CA19-9 has been commonly used as a biomarker of pancreatic cancer. However, the specificity and sensitivity of this biomarker have not been satisfactory[8-10].

Vimentin is reported as an important mesenchymal marker, and plays an important role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in malignant tumors with regard to cellular adhesion, migration and signaling[11,12]. Several investigators have previously shown that Vimentin is an important marker for the early detection of cancer, such as bladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer[13,14]. In addition, methylation of the Vimentin gene is described as a marker in several malignant tumors, including gastric carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, cervical cancer and bladder cancer[13,15-17]. In our current study, we have attempted to identify the relationship between the methylation state of Vimentin and pancreatic cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection and DNA preparation

Sixty-four primary tumor specimens and normal tissues were collected consecutively from pancreatic cancer patients undergoing surgery at Hangzhou First People’s Hospital and Affiliated Hospital of the Logistics University of the Chinese People’s Armed Police Force. All specimens were confirmed by histopathology. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All the collected samples were stored at -80°C. DNA from the samples was extracted by QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Catalog number: 51306, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients who were enrolled in our study are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinicopathological features of pancreatic carcinoma n (%).
DataVimentin methylated negative group (n = 43)2Vimentin methylated positive group (n = 21)3P value
Sex0.582
Male27 (62.8)15 (71.4)
Female16 (37.2)6 (28.6)
Tumor position0.007
Head11 (25.6)13 (61.9)
Body and tail32 (74.4)8 (38.1)
Preoperative CEA level0.294
Normal20 (46.5)13 (61.9)
Elevated23 (53.5)8 (38.1)
Preoperative CA19-9 level0.600
Normal24 (55.8)10 (47.6)
Elevated19 (44.2)11 (52.4)
Pathological N staging10.426
N021(48.8)13 (61.9)
N122 (51.2)8 (38.1)
Pathological T staging10.753
T114 (32.6)5 (23.8)
T219 (44.2)11 (52.4)
T310 (23.3)5 (23.8)
Adjuvant chemotherapy0.791
No20 (46.5)11 (52.4)
Yes23 (53.5)10 (47.6)
Sodium bisulfite modification

Genomic tumor DNA (1 μg) and the corresponding normal pancreatic tissue specimens were subjected to bisulfite treatment using an Epitect Bisulfite Kit (Catalog No. 59104, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany)[18].

Quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction

The bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified using a quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and a Thermal Cycler Dice® Real-time System TP800 (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan). Thermo-cycling was carried out in a final volume of 25 μL containing 1.0 μL of the DNA sample, 100 nmol/L each of the Vimentin or β-actin primers (forward and reverse sequences), and 12.5 μL of SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan), which consists of Taq DNA polymerase, PCR reaction buffer and deoxynucleotide triphosphate mixture. The qPCR primer sequences for Vimentin were: Vimentin MS (sense), 5’-TCGTTTCGAGGTTTTCGCGTTAGAGAC-3’, and Vimentin MAS (antisense), 5’-CGACTAAAACTCGACCGACTCGCGA-3’. The PCR amplification consisted of 40 cycles (95°C for 5 s and 55°C for 30 s) after an initial denaturation step (95°C for 10 s). To correct for differences between the samples in terms of both the quality and quantity of the purified DNA, β-actin was used as an internal control. The targets were obtained from the same bisulfite treated DNA.

Vimentin methylation scores

The relative levels of methylated Vimentin DNA in pancreatic cancer and the corresponding normal pancreatic tissues were calculated by normalizing to the internal control of β-actin. The Vimentin methylation scores were calculated by comparing the relative levels of Vimentin in pancreatic carcinoma with the corresponding levels in normal pancreatic tissue. The methylation status was recorded as positive when the Vimentin methylation score was greater than 1.0.

Follow-up

After treatment, the patients were monitored every month for the first year, every 3 mo for the second year, and then every 6 mo thereafter. Telephone calls and letters were used to identify patients who could not attend regular follow-up assessments. Complete data were collected for all 64 patients through December 31, 2012. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 38 mo (with a median of 17 mo).

Statistical analysis

The χ2 test was used to compare categorical variables between the palliatively operated group with the other groups. Student’s t-tests were used to compare paired continuous variables. Univariate survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier methods. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software version 20.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Statistical significance was defined as an alpha value of P < 0.05.

RESULTS
Vimentin methylation in pancreatic cancer and corresponding pancreatic tissues

We detected Vimentin methylation in pancreatic cancer and corresponding pancreatic tissues. Of the 64 pancreatic cancer tissues, 21 of them had a high-level methylation status and 45 of the corresponding pancreatic tissues had a high level of methylation. There were 9 pancreatic cancer tissues and 5 normal corresponding pancreatic tissues without methylation of the Vimentin gene. In addition, Vimentin methylation scores were recorded and informed that 43 of them were marked as Vimentin methylation-negative, and the remaining 21 were Vimentin methylation-positive.

Vimentin methylation state was related to the age and the diameter of the tumor

The clinicopathological factors seen between these two groups are summarized in Table 1. Moreover, we found that the location of the pancreatic carcinoma was associated with the status of Vimentin methylation. However, patient gender, preoperative serum tumor markers, lymph node metastasis and pathological T-stage were found not to be associated with the Vimentin methylation state.

Vimentin methylation state was an independent prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer

Univariate analysis showed that tumor position (P = 0.002), pathological T-staging (P < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.015) and the Vimentin methylation state (P = 0.013) were prognostic factors in pancreatic carcinoma (Table 2 and Figure 1). Multivariate analysis showed that the pathological T-staging (P < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.003) and the Vimentin methylation state (P = 0.037) were independent prognostic factors (Table 3).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Univariate analysis: Tumor position, pathological T staging, adjuvant chemotherapy and vimentin methylation state were prognostic factors for the pancreatic carcinoma patients. A: Tumor position; B: T staging; C: Adjuvant chemotherapy; D: VIM methylation status.
Table 2 Univariate analysis of overall survival in pancreatic carcinoma.
VariablesnMedian survival (mo)P value
Sex0.819
Male4213.45
Female2210.84
Preoperative CEA0.260
Normal3315.15
Elevated3113.61
Preoperative CA19-90.947
Normal4014.12
Elevated2415.09
Tumor position0.007
Body and tail4016.20
Head2411.25
Pathological T stage< 0.001
T11921.01
T23013.10
T3158.00
Pathological N stage0.311
N03414.28
N13016.20
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Yes3316.120.015
No3113.07
Vimentin methylation state0.013
Positive2111.09
Negative4316.03
Table 3 Multivariate analyses of overall survival in pancreatic carcinoma (Cox’s regression model).
VariableHR95%CIP value
OS in all pancreatic cancer patients
Tumor position1.7890.873-3.6660.112
Pathological T staging4.0262.283-7.101<0.001
Adjuvant chemotherapy0.3560.181-0.6980.003
Vimentin methylation state2.2501.052-4.8130.037
DISCUSSION

An estimated 44030 people were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and approximately 37660 people died of pancreatic cancer in the United States in 2011[19]. Although the technology of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has been developed, the incidence and mortality rates have remained approximately the same over the past two decades. A mutation in the CDKN2A (p16) gene has been reported in families with pancreatic cancer and melanoma[20,21]. An excess of pancreatic cancer is also seen in families harboring breast cancer susceptibility gene-2 mutations, and particular mutations in the PALB2 and MSH2 genes have recently been identified as possibly increasing pancreatic cancer susceptibility[22-25]. Vimentin is a key molecular marker of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, but it is not yet associated with either the occurrence or degree of malignancy of pancreatic carcinoma.

CpG methylation is a major epigenetic modification of genome DNA that is involved in the regulation of cell-specific gene expression[26]. It has been proposed that this modification may cause transcriptional repression by directly modulating transcription factor function or by triggering the formation of inactive chromatin[27,28]. We found that of 64 pancreatic cancer tissues, 21 of them displayed a high level of methylation status and 45 of the corresponding pancreatic tissues displayed a high level of methylation. Moreover, survival analysis showed that the Vimentin methylation status was an independent prognostic factor as well as a prognostic marker in T-staging and adjuvant chemotherapy. We are also aware that a low methylation status is always associated with high Vimentin expression levels. Additionally, Vimentin has been shown to be associated with several pathways, including cell adhesion, cytoplasmic microtubule assembly, and cytoskeleton remodeling. Higher Vimentin expression in pancreatic cancer cells may imply a higher state of malignancy of these cells, with an associated higher metastatic ability. The detailed mechanism of Vimentin and its gene methylation status requires further study.

Our observations only covered 64 pancreatic cancer patients, which is a small population sample. Although our results showed that the Vimentin methylation status could be used to predict prognosis in pancreatic cancer, more studies and clinical trials are needed to validate this result. In summary, our study showed that pancreatic cancer patients exhibiting a negative Vimentin methylation status displayed a poorer prognosis as compared with those with a positive status. The role of Vimentin methylation in pancreatic cancer warrants further empirical exploration.

COMMENTS
Background

Vimentin is reported as an important mesenchymal marker, and plays an important role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in malignant tumors with regard to cellular adhesion, migration and signaling. In their current study, authors have attempted to identify the relationship between the methylation state of the Vimentin gene and pancreatic cancer.

Research frontiers

Several investigators have previously shown that Vimentin is an important marker for the early detection of cancer, such as bladder cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer. In addition, methylation of Vimentin is described as a marker in several malignant tumors, including gastric carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, cervical cancer and bladder cancer.

Innovations and breakthroughs

The location of pancreatic carcinoma was related to the Vimentin methylation state. The pathological T staging (P < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.003) and the Vimentin methylation state (P = 0.037) were independent prognostic factors.

Applications

This result showed that the Vimentin methylation status could be used to predict prognosis in pancreatic cancer.

Peer review

The manuscript is very interesting. The authors try to determine the existence of a potential relationship between the methylation state of Vimentin and its prognostic value in pancreatic cancer. In total, 64 primary tumor specimens and normal tissues were collected in this study. The authors found that Vimentin methylation status can predict the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: McHenry L, Schmidt S- Editor: Qi Y L- Editor: Logan S E- Editor: Du P

References
1.  Michalski CW, Weitz J, Büchler MW. Surgery insight: surgical management of pancreatic cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007;4:526-535.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Hirata K, Egawa S, Kimura Y, Nobuoka T, Oshima H, Katsuramaki T, Mizuguchi T, Furuhata T. Current status of surgery for pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg. 2007;24:137-147.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Cardenes HR, Chiorean EG, Dewitt J, Schmidt M, Loehrer P. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: current therapeutic approach. Oncologist. 2006;11:612-623.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 81]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Carpelan-Holmström M, Nordling S, Pukkala E, Sankila R, Lüttges J, Klöppel G, Haglund C. Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry. Gut. 2005;54:385-387.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 236]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 255]  [Article Influence: 13.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225-249.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7953]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8028]  [Article Influence: 535.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
6.  Sultana A, Smith CT, Cunningham D, Starling N, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P. Meta-analyses of chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2607-2615.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 285]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 284]  [Article Influence: 16.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Hawes RH, Xiong Q, Waxman I, Chang KJ, Evans DB, Abbruzzese JL. A multispecialty approach to the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:17-31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 114]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 5.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Wu X, Lu XH, Xu T, Qian JM, Zhao P, Guo XZ, Yang XO, Jiang WJ. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of serum tumor markers, and fecal k-ras and p53 gene mutations for pancreatic cancer. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006;7:170-174.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Leung TK, Lee CM, Wang FC, Chen HC, Wang HJ. Difficulty with diagnosis of malignant pancreatic neoplasms coexisting with chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:5075-5078.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Zhou G, Chiu D, Qin D, Niu L, Cai J, He L, Huang W, Xu K. The efficacy evaluation of cryosurgery in pancreatic cancer patients with the expression of CD44v6, integrin-β1, CA199, and CEA. Mol Biotechnol. 2012;52:59-67.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Lee JM, Dedhar S, Kalluri R, Thompson EW. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: new insights in signaling, development, and disease. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:973-981.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1482]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1561]  [Article Influence: 86.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Ivaska J, Pallari HM, Nevo J, Eriksson JE. Novel functions of vimentin in cell adhesion, migration, and signaling. Exp Cell Res. 2007;313:2050-2062.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 528]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 544]  [Article Influence: 32.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Costa VL, Henrique R, Danielsen SA, Duarte-Pereira S, Eknaes M, Skotheim RI, Rodrigues A, Magalhães JS, Oliveira J, Lothe RA. Three epigenetic biomarkers, GDF15, TMEFF2, and VIM, accurately predict bladder cancer from DNA-based analyses of urine samples. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5842-5851.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 126]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 135]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Wong KF, Luk JM. Discovery of lamin B1 and vimentin as circulating biomarkers for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;909:295-310.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Shirahata A, Sakata M, Sakuraba K, Goto T, Mizukami H, Saito M, Ishibashi K, Kigawa G, Nemoto H, Sanada Y. Vimentin methylation as a marker for advanced colorectal carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:279-281.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Shirahata A, Sakuraba K, Kitamura Y, Yokomizo K, Gotou T, Saitou M, Kigawa G, Nemoto H, Sanada Y, Hibi K. Detection of vimentin methylation in the serum of patients with gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:791-794.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Jung S, Yi L, Kim J, Jeong D, Oh T, Kim CH, Kim CJ, Shin J, An S, Lee MS. The role of vimentin as a methylation biomarker for early diagnosis of cervical cancer. Mol Cells. 2011;31:405-411.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Hibi K, Sakata M, Sakuraba K, Shirahata A, Goto T, Mizukami H, Saito M, Ishibashi K, Kigawa G, Nemoto H. Aberrant methylation of the HACE1 gene is frequently detected in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:1581-1584.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:212-236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3032]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3078]  [Article Influence: 236.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Ghiorzo P, Gargiulo S, Nasti S, Pastorino L, Battistuzzi L, Bruno W, Bonelli L, Taveggia P, Pugliese V, Borgonovo G. Predicting the risk of pancreatic cancer: on CDKN2A mutations in the melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndrome in Italy. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5336-537; author reply 5336-537;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Whelan AJ, Bartsch D, Goodfellow PJ. Brief report: a familial syndrome of pancreatic cancer and melanoma with a mutation in the CDKN2 tumor-suppressor gene. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:975-977.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 201]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 214]  [Article Influence: 7.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Ferrone CR, Levine DA, Tang LH, Allen PJ, Jarnagin W, Brennan MF, Offit K, Robson ME. BRCA germline mutations in Jewish patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:433-438.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 146]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 154]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Hahn SA, Greenhalf B, Ellis I, Sina-Frey M, Rieder H, Korte B, Gerdes B, Kress R, Ziegler A, Raeburn JA. BRCA2 germline mutations in familial pancreatic carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:214-221.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 359]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 325]  [Article Influence: 15.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Slater EP, Langer P, Niemczyk E, Strauch K, Butler J, Habbe N, Neoptolemos JP, Greenhalf W, Bartsch DK. PALB2 mutations in European familial pancreatic cancer families. Clin Genet. 2010;78:490-494.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 179]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 176]  [Article Influence: 13.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Lindor NM, Petersen GM, Spurdle AB, Thompson B, Goldgar DE, Thibodeau SN. Pancreatic cancer and a novel MSH2 germline alteration. Pancreas. 2011;40:1138-1140.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002;16:6-21.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5074]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4679]  [Article Influence: 212.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Shin TH, Paterson AJ, Grant JH, Meluch AA, Kudlow JE. 5-Azacytidine treatment of HA-A melanoma cells induces Sp1 activity and concomitant transforming growth factor alpha expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:3998-4006.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Ammanamanchi S, Kim SJ, Sun LZ, Brattain MG. Induction of transforming growth factor-beta receptor type II expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells through SP1 activation by 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:16527-16534.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]