Brief Article Open Access
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2013; 19(28): 4531-4536
Published online Jul 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i28.4531
Newly designed J-shaped tip guidewire: A preliminary feasibility study in wire-guided cannulation
Shigefumi Omuta, Iruru Maetani, Hiroaki Shigoka, Katsushige Gon, Michihiro Saito, Junya Tokuhisa, Mieko Naruki, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo 153-8515, Japan
Author contributions: Omuta S contributed to analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article and revising for reviewers comments; Maetani I contributed to conception and design, critical revision of the article and data collection; Shigoka H contributed to data collection; Omuta S, Gon K, Saito M, Tokuhisa J and Naruki M contributed to treatment of patients and data collection; all authors approved the final version of the paper.
Supported by Toho University Ohashi Medical Center
Correspondence to: Iruru Maetani, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-17-6 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8515, Japan. mtnir50637@med.toho-u.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-3-34681251 Fax: +81-3-54650210
Received: January 10, 2013
Revised: April 24, 2013
Accepted: May 9, 2013
Published online: July 28, 2013
Processing time: 199 Days and 15.5 Hours

Abstract

AIM: To perform wire-guided cannulation using a newly designed J-shaped tip guidewire, and to verify feasibility and safety for use.

METHODS: The study was conducted on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) patients with naïve papilla undergoing diagnosis and treatment of biliary diseases between September 2011 and July 2012. We performed ERCP in a succession of 50 cases with a J-shaped tip guidewire. The first insertion attempt began with a trainee who had 5 min to complete cannulation, followed if necessary by the trainer for another 5 min. We assessed the primary success rate of selective biliary cannulation within 10 min and adverse events such as post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), bleeding or perforation.

RESULTS: The primary success rate was 90% (45/50) within 10 min, the initial success rate within 5 min by trainee staff was 76% (38/50). The rate of PEP was 6% (3/50), but all 3 cases were mild pancreatitis. All patients were managed successfully with conservative treatment. There was no bleeding or perforation.

CONCLUSION: A newly designed J-shaped tip guide-wire has the possibility to facilitate selective biliary cannulation for ERCP and appears to be safe.

Key Words: J-shaped tip guidewire; Wire-guided cannulation; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Biliary tract; Cannulation technique; Perforation

Core tip: We conducted a feasibility study that performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with a newly designed J-shaped tip guidewire. This new guidewire has a strongly-flexed atraumatic tip with hydrophilic coating; therefore, it may contribute to the improvement of the passage through the intra-duodenal biliary segment and to the decrease of adverse events such as post-ERCP pancreatitis. We assessed the primary success rate of selective biliary cannulation within 10 min and rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis. The primary success rate was 90% (45/50); the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 6% (3/50), but all 3 cases were mild. The J-shaped tip guidewire may facilitate selective biliary cannulation in ERCP.



INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is used to diagnose and treat biliary disease. Deep cannulation of the common bile duct is required for this procedure, and the current success rate for the relatively difficult conventional contrast-guided cannulation (CGC) technique ranges from 50%-90%[1-5]. Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) is a recently developed alternative to CGC that has been shown to increase primary biliary cannulation rate[6-11], chiefly by reducing incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP)[12-20]. However, despite efficiency improvements, the sharp tips of guidewires are sometimes associated with perforation[21-23]. Even without perforation, complications can occur when the guidewire tip hits the fold and flexion of the intra-duodenal biliary segment. While a looped tip guidewire has been developed, its utility in avoiding perforation has not sufficiently been evaluated[24].

Here, we assessed the efficiency of ERCP using a newly designed J-shaped tip guidewire with a strongly flexed atraumatic tip and hydrophilic coating designed to improve passage through intra-duodenal biliary segments and decrease the adverse events, such as PEP, bleeding or perforation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients

Fifty patients with naïve papilla undergoing diagnosis and treatment for biliary diseases between September 2011 and July 2012 received ERCP using J-shaped tip guidewires. Patients were excluded if only their pancreatic ducts were diagnosed or treated, if they had previously undergone endoscopic sphincteroplasty, or if they had duodenal stenosis or Billroth II or Roux-en-Y anastomosis, or refused to provide informed consent.

Patients were sedated via intravenous administration of midazolam (5-10 mg) and buprenorphine (0.2 mg). Scopolamine butylbromide (20 mg) or glucagon (1 mg) was injected intravenously to inhibit gastrointestinal peristalsis, and each patient received nafamostat mesilate (20 mg/d) prior to ERCP. Blood samples collected 2 h after ERCP were used to determine complete blood counts and serum amylase levels, and those collected after 18-24 h also measured hepatobiliary enzymes and C-reactive protein. We did not place a pancreatic duct stent for the prevention of pancreatitis in either procedure.

J-shaped tip guidewire

The guidewire (RWHJ-2545A, 0.025-inch; Paiolax Medical Devices, Inc., Kanagawa, Japan) tip was bent to attain a 1-mm radius, and a hydrophilic coating was applied starting 50 mm from the tip. The shaft was covered by a sheath and the jacket coated with water-repellent material (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Newly designed J-shaped tip guidewire. The shape of the tip is a radius of 1 mm; 50 mm from the tip is the start of a hydrophilic coating.
Endoscopic procedure

Endoscopy was performed with JF-260V (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) or ED-530XT8 (Fujinon, Tokyo, Japan) endoscopes, after catheters were preloaded with guidewires. In the present study, in general, a regular catheter was chosen except for the case undergoing sphincterotomy. First, catheters (CleverCut3 V, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan; Tamdem XL, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, United States) were preloaded with guidewires, the guidewire tip was extended 5 mm from the catheter, bent into a “J” shape, and then the guidewire was pulled back into a stand-by position (Figure 2A). Endoscopists controlled the direction parallel to the axis of bile duct of the catheter by inches. Assisting endoscopists participated in the guidewire manipulation in all cases. An assisting endoscopist moved the guidewire back and forth in small motions by using a tactile feedback (in-and-out movement method). No fluoroscope was used during attempts of insertion, but once the guidewire was inserted without resistance then fluoroscopy was used only after insertion to confirm success (Figure 2B). The catheter was then inserted into the biliary system along the guidewire, and contrast medium was injected (Figure 2C). No test injection was performed before successful cannulation.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Endoscopic and fluoroscopic images showing the technique with J-shaped tip guidewire. A: Assistant endoscopist extended approximately 5 mm of the guidewire tip and restored it to the original “J” configuration (stand-by position); B: Selective biliary cannulation was attempted under endoscopic control without fluoroscopy; C: The guidewire was moved in an in-and-out motion by an assisting endoscopist. Once the guidewire was advanced without resistance, fluoroscopy was used to confirm successful cannulation; D: Contrast medium was injected after confirmation of successful biliary cannulation.

The first insertion attempt began with a trainee who had 5 min to complete cannulation, followed if necessary by a trainer with career experience of over 500 ERCPs (Maetani I or Shigoka H or Omuta S) for another 5 min. If both attempts failed, efforts continued with a standard biliary guidewire (Jagwire 0.035 angle type, Boston Scientific) for another 10 min (second attempt) and were repeated as necessary according to the trainers’ recommendations (exchange of endoscopist or guidewire, pancreatic duct guidewire placement method, or pre-cutting sphincterotomy).

Definitions

Success was defined as completing cannulation with the J-shaped tip guidewire and obtaining a cholangiogram within 10 min. Cannulation time was defined as from when a tip of the guidewire first touched the orifice of the papilla to the obtainment of cholangiogram. PEP was defined as continued abdominal pain ≥ 24 h after ERCP, with more than 3 times the normal (upper limit) serum-amylase level[25]. Pancreatitis severity was classified using the Atlanta International Symposium criteria[26]. Suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction was defined according to the revised Milwaukee classification[27]. Sphincter of Oddi manometory was not performed. Hyperamylasemia was defined as 3 times the normal (upper limit) amylase level 18-24 h after ERCP.

Ethics

The protocol adhered to the Helsinki Declaration and was approved in advance by the Institutional Ethical Review Board. The trial was registered with the University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000007526). All participants gave written informed consent beforehand.

Outcome measurement

The primary study endpoint was the success rate of cannulation with the J-shaped tip guidewire performed within 10 min. The secondary endpoints were as follows: (1) the rate of the occurrence of PEP; (2) time to selective biliary cannulation; (3) number of attempts for selective biliary cannulation; and (4) number of accidental pancreatic duct insertions. Data are presented as median and interquartile ranges (IQR).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and indications are summarized in Table 1, and details of the endoscopic procedure are given in Table 2.

Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics and indications.
Item (n = 50)Value
Age, yr [median (IQR)]75.3 (68-83)
Sex (male)24
Periampullary diverticulum, n (%)22 (44)
Indications
Choledocolithiasis (including suspicion)27
Cholangiocarcinoma7
Pancreatic cancer6
Gallbladder cancer4
Other malignant disease2
Cholangiocellular carcinoma1
Suspected biliary SOD1
Mirrizi syndrome1
Biliary leak after cholecystectomy1
Table 2 Number of patients receiving different procedures.
Proceduren
Endoscopic papillary (large) balloon dilation24
Endoscopic sphincterotomy19
Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage20
Endoscopic nasobiliary gallbladder drainage2
Placement of biliary stent (plastic or metal)18
Intraductal ultrasonography7
Aspiration, biopsy12
Only cholangiogram0

The overall success rate of endoscopy was 90% (45/50, Table 3), with cannulation achieved within the first 5 min in 38 patients (76%). Cannulation was achieved on the second attempt in 3 patients. The median time to cannulation for these 48 patients was 42.5 s (IQR: 5-262 s). Of the remaining two patients, one required pancreatic duct guidewire placement and the other a pre-cutting sphincterotomy. The median number of attempts was 2.0 (IQR: 1.0-6.0), and the median number of accidental pancreatic duct insertions was 1.0 (IQR: 0.0-3.0). The median serum-amylase level was 148 IU/L (IQR: 94-331 IU/L), and hyperamylasemia occurred in 4 patients.

Table 3 Cannulation outcomes.
Item (n = 50)Value
Success, n (%)45 (90)
< 5 min38 (76)
5-10 min7 (14)
Time to selective biliary cannulation1, s42.5 (5.0-262.0)
No. of attempts12.0 (1.0-6.0)
No. of accidental pancreatic duct insertion11.0 (0.0-3.0)
Amylase level1, IU/L148 (94-331)
Post-ERCP pancreatitis, n (%)3 (6)
Mild3
Severe0
Hyperamylasemia, n (%)4 (8)

Mild PEP occurred in 3 patients (6%); in 2 of these, success was achieved within 5 min after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation, while the third patient received the pre-cutting sphincterotomy mentioned above. All patients were managed successfully with conservative treatment. There were no other adverse events including bleeding or perforation.

DISCUSSION

The success rate for selective biliary cannulation using a J-shaped tip guidewire was comparable to that found in previous studies[6-16,28,29], and no guidewire-related adverse events such as bleeding or perforation occurred. Although ours was a preliminary study, the atraumatic and blunt tip of the new guidewire may facilitate selective biliary cannulation (Figure 3A) and reduce instances of perforation and bleeding.

Figure 3
Figure 3 An image via intra-duodenal biliary segments of J-shaped tip guidewire (A) and standard guidewire (B). A: Blunted J-shaped tip may facilitate passage through intra-duodenal segment (arrow); B: Normal guidewire tips may be become stuck in epithelial folds or flexion of intra-duodenal biliary segments (arrowheads).

Although straight and angled tips are the most common types used in WGC[1-20,28,29], these sharp tips often stick in the intra-duodenal biliary segment (Figure 3B). While the superiority of the J-shaped tip cannot be definitively shown without controls, the success rate, speed of cannulation, and facility of use appear improved compared to other studies. While similar procedures using standard guidewires resulted in a 77.9% overall success rate (trainees and trainer combined)[28], here we achieved a 76% success rate with trainees, and an overall success rate of 90%. Additionally, the 6% PEP rate is similar to that of other studies[14,18,19,20].

WGC was first introduced by Siegel et al[30]. Meta-analysis has shown that the reduction of pancreatic duct opacification is another possible advantage over CGC[14,18,19]. Further, WGC has been suggested to decrease the risk of PEP[14,18,19], facilitating its spread across the globe as a potential first-line method.

Usually, when guidewires are extended from the tip of a catheter without enough space for advancement, the wire may act like a needle and pierce the epithelium. The J-shape of the guidewire protrudes from the catheter before approaching the biliary orifice, and reduces this likelihood. We therefore believe our J-shaped design to be the aspect that improved insertion into the biliary system. Limitations to this study include small sample size, no controls, a single institution, and involvement of multiple endoscopists. A randomized comparison is warranted for objective evaluation of its performance. One drawback of the J-shaped tip guidewire is the 1-mm radius, which is wider than a standard guidewire and may hamper selective cannulation through a narrow orifice.

In conclusion, a newly designed guidewire with a J-shaped tip may facilitate selective biliary cannulation in ERCP. However, a large prospective randomized control trial is necessary to verify the performance of this guidewire in comparison with standard guidewires.

COMMENTS
Background

Selective biliary cannulation is essential for diagnosis and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in biliary diseases. Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) increases the primary biliary cannulation rate and decreases the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Therefore, WGC is now widely performed. However, even experts meet with difficulty and the possible risk of bleeding and perforation due to the guidewire.

Research frontiers

The authors performed ERCP using a newly designed J-shaped tip guidewire. A J-shaped tip guidewire with a strongly flexed atraumatic tip and hydrophilic coating was designed to improve passage through intra-duodenal biliary segments and decrease the adverse events, such as PEP, bleeding and perforation. The authors conducted a feasible study.

Innovations and breakthroughs

This is a single center pilot study. The primary success rate was 90% (45/50) within 10 min. The rate of PEP was 6% (3/50), but all 3 cases were mild pancreatitis. All patients were managed successfully with conservative treatment. There was no bleeding or perforation.

Applications

A newly designed J-shaped tip guidewire may facilitate selective biliary cannulation and the structure of the tip may contribute to decrease PEP and bleeding, or perforation. However, it is necessary to conduct a large prospective randomized control trial to verify the performance.

Peer review

This is a single center pilot study of a newly designed J-shaped tip guidewire for wire-guided cannulation. The authors hypothesized that the J-shaped tip prevented perforation or PEP during cannulation. The limitation of this study is a small sample size without a control group as the authors discussed.

Footnotes

P- Reviewers Dormann AJ, Gassler N, Nakai Y S- Editor Zhai HH L- Editor Logan S E- Editor Li JY

References
1.  Kumar S, Sherman S, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Success and yield of second attempt ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:445-447.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Maydeo A, Borkar D. Techniques of selective cannulation and sphincterotomy. Endoscopy. 2003;35:S19-S23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Cotton PB. Income and outcome metrics for the objective evaluation of ERCP and alternative methods. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:S283-S290.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Lehman GA. What are the determinants of success in utilization of ERCP in the setting of pancreatic and biliary diseases? Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:S291-S293.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Kowalski T, Kanchana T, Pungpapong S. Perceptions of gastroenterology fellows regarding ERCP competency and training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:345-349.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Schwacha H, Allgaier HP, Deibert P, Olschewski M, Allgaier U, Blum HE. A sphincterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:387-391.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE, Halwan B, Ishioka S, Kumar A. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2147-2153.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Walsh PR, Murray MA, Lee EY, Kwan V, Lynch PM. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2008;40:296-301.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 153]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 158]  [Article Influence: 9.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, Chatzimavroudis G, Zavos C, Pilpilidis I, Tzelas G, Tzovaras G. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy. 2008;40:302-307.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 69]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 71]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Bourke MJ, Costamagna G, Freeman ML. Biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: core technique and recent innovations. Endoscopy. 2009;41:612-617.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Halttunen J, Kylänpää L. A prospective randomized study of thin versus regular-sized guide wire in wire-guided cannulation. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1662-1667.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E, Bonassi U. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:830-834.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 121]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 135]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Lee TH, Park do H, Park JY, Kim EO, Lee YS, Park JH, Lee SH, Chung IK, Kim HS, Park SH. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:444-449.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 110]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, Eusebi LH, Ceroni L, Laterza L, Fabbri C, Bazzoli F. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis?: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2343-2350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 110]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 105]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, Furutake M. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:5289-5294.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Karamanolis G, Katsikani A, Viazis N, Stefanidis G, Manolakopoulos S, Sgouros S, Papadopoulou E, Mantides A. A prospective cross-over study using a sphincterotome and a guidewire to increase the success rate of common bile duct cannulation. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:1649-1652.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:112-125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 215]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 214]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Cheung J, Tsoi KK, Quan WL, Lau JY, Sung JJ. Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1211-1219.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Eachus P. Multidimensional health locus of control in nurses. J Adv Nurs. 1991;16:165-171.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:80-88.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
21.  Stapfer M, Selby RR, Stain SC, Katkhouda N, Parekh D, Jabbour N, Garry D. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg. 2000;232:191-198.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Fatima J, Baron TH, Topazian MD, Houghton SG, Iqbal CW, Ott BJ, Farley DR, Farnell MB, Sarr MG. Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: diagnosis and management. Arch Surg. 2007;142:448-454; discussion 454-455.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Machado NO. Management of duodenal perforation post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP. 2012;13:18-25.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Ayala JC, Labbe R, Vera E, Moran M. The loop tip wire guide: A new device to facilitate better access through the papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:AB236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383-393.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
26.  Bradley EL. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg. 1993;128:586-590.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, Toouli J, Venu RP. The efficacy of endoscopic sphincterotomy after cholecystectomy in patients with sphincter-of-Oddi dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:82-87.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Nambu T, Ukita T, Shigoka H, Omuta S, Maetani I. Wire-guided selective cannulation of the bile duct with a sphincterotome: a prospective randomized comparative study with the standard method. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:109-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Nakai Y, Isayama H, Tsujino T, Sasahira N, Hirano K, Kogure H, Sasaki T, Kawakubo K, Yagioka H, Yashima Y. Impact of introduction of wire-guided cannulation in therapeutic biliary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:1552-1558.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Siegel JH, Pullano W. Two new methods for selective bile duct cannulation and sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987;33:438-440.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]