Rapid Communication Open Access
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2007; 13(12): 1820-1823
Published online Mar 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i12.1820
Role of intravenously administered hyoscine butyl bromide in retrograde terminal ileoscopy: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
SP Misra, M Dwivedi, Department of Gastroenterology, Moti Lal Nehru Medical College, University of Allahabad, Allahabad 211001, India
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: SP Misra, MD, DM, FRCP, FICP, FACG, FNASc, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, Motilal Nehru Medical College, Allahabad 211001, India. spmisra@sancharnet.in
Telephone: +91-532-2256087 Fax: +91-532-2256274
Received: December 21, 2006
Revised: December 28, 2006
Accepted: January 4, 2007
Published online: March 28, 2007

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the role of hyoscine butyl bromide in facilitating retrograde ileoscopy.

METHODS: Retrograde terminal ileoscopy was attempted in 200 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy. After intubation of the cecum and visualization of the ileocecal valve, hyoscine butyl bromide injection or normal saline was given intravenously to the patients in a double blind random fashion. The pulse rate and oxygen saturation were measured continuously. After completion of the procedure, endoscopists were then asked to score the ease of intubation and the ease of visualization of the terminal ileum on a visual scale of 1 to 10. The patients were also asked to score the pain after receiving hyoscine butyl bromide injection on a score of 1 to 10.

RESULTS: Terminal ileoscopy could be performed in 188 patients. The mean (SD) visual analogue score for the ease of intubation of the cecum was 7.4 (0.65) in the injection group and 5.9 (0.8) in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The mean (SD) length of ileum visualized in the injection group was 14.4 (3.3) cm and 10.4 (2.7) cm in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The mean (SD) visual analogue score for ease of visualization of the terminal ileum was 7.5 (0.69) in the injection group and 5.9 (0.7) in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The pain score experienced by the patients was 6.5 (0.7) in the injection group and 6.7 (0.69) in the placebo group (P < 0.008). Although the pulse rate increased significantly in patients receiving the drug, no statistically significant difference was noted in the oxygen saturation between the two groups either before or after administration of the drug. No complications were observed in either of the groups.

CONCLUSION: Hyoscine butyl bromide injection is a useful adjunct in helping the intubation and visualization of terminal ileum during colonoscopy.

Key Words: Ileoscopy; Colonoscopy; Colon; Ileum; Hyoscine; Tuberculosis; Inflammatory bowel disease; Cancer



INTRODUCTION

Colonoscopy is the procedure of choice for investigating patients with diseases of the colon and terminal ileum, such as colonic adenomas or cancer, fecal occult blood loss, inflammatory bowel disease, iron deficiency anemia, colonic tuberculosis and hematochezia[1-8].

Terminal ileoscopy is an integral part of complete colonoscopy. Retrograde terminal ileoscopy has been noted to be useful in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, diarrhea, lymphoma, cytomegalovirus-induced ileitis, tuberculosis, portal hypertension and a host of other conditions involving the terminal ileum[7-21]. In a recent study, we have noted that obtaining blind biopsies from even a normal-appearing terminal ileum is useful in patients suspected of having ileocaecal tuberculosis[22]. Although terminal ileoscopy has been recommended by several authors[7-10,22], it is not routinely performed when colonoscopy is done in all patients undergoing colonoscopy[3]. A more recent study showed that routine ileoscopy is very useful and easy to perform after proper training has been imparted. Except for a study that found that hyoscine butyl bromide injection is helpful in performing ileoscopy[23], the role of hyoscine butyl bromide in facilitating retrograde terminal ileoscopy has not been evaluated. The present study was therefore planned to evaluate the role, if any, of hyoscine butyl bromide injection in performing ileoscopy at colonoscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrograde terminal ileoscopy was attempted in 200 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy. Colonic preparation was performed using a polyethylene glycol-electrolyte-based solution (Peglec, Tablets India, Ltd, Chennai, India).

Patients with a previous history of abdominal surgery, glaucoma, obstructive uropathy, autonomic dysfunction and allergy to hyoscine butyl bromide (Buscopan) were excluded from the study. All patients received midazolam for conscious sedation. Colonoscopy was performed using an Olympus videocolonoscope (CF 130 L, Olympus, Tokyo) without any attachment.

At colonoscopy, a careful search was made for any lesion in the colon. After reaching the cecum, attempt was made to localize the ileocecal opening. Once it was visualized, 1 mL of hyoscine butyl bromide injection (German Remedies, Mumbai) containing 20 mg of the drug or an equal volume of normal saline was administered intravenously to the patients in a double blind random fashion by a nursing assistant. Once in the terminal ileum all attempts were made to go as far as possible in the ileum. Any abnormality in mucosa of the terminal ileum was carefully recorded and biopsies were obtained from suspicious-looking lesions. The endoscopists scored the ease of intubation and the ease of visualization of the terminal ileum on a visual analogue score of 1-10. The length of terminal ileum visualized was also recorded during withdrawal of the colonoscope, when the length of the colonoscope inside the ileocecal valve was measured. The pulse rate and oxygen saturation were measured continuously using a pulse oximeter. However for the study purposes the values just before administration of hyoscine butyl bromide or saline and at the end of the procedure were taken. After the procedure the patients scored the pain they felt while the terminal ileum was intubated or visualized, on a visual analogue score of 1-10.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test and chi-square test with or without Yates’ correction as appropriate. All patients gave their informed consent and IRB clearance was obtained before start of the trial.

RESULTS

During the study period, 200 colonoscopies were performed. The indications for colonoscopy are given in Table 1. The cecum could be intubated in all patients. Repeat colonoscopy had to be performed in 21 (10.5%) patients due to poor preparation during the first colonoscopy.

Table 1 Indications for colonoscopy in two groups of patients n = 200.
IndicationGroup 1(active drug)Group 2(placebo)Total
Unexplained abdominal pain5556111
Suspected colonic tuberculosis141226
Ulcerative colitis111324
Hematochezia5510
Fecal occult blood positive4610
Colon cancer246
Occult gastrointestinal bleeding224
Colonic polyp123
Portal hypertension (colonic bleed)213
Crohn’s disease213

Despite all attempts, the terminal ileum could not be intubated in 12 patients: 4 due to deformed ileocecal valve and 8 due to non-visualization of the ileocecal opening. These patients were excluded from the final analysis. Hyoscine butyl bromide injection was administered to 2 patients and normal saline to 2 patients with deformed ileocecal valve respectively. As per protocol, injections were administered only on visualization of the ileocaecal opening and therefore no injection was given to patients in whom the ileocecal valve was not visualized.

The mean (SD) age of these patients was 44.7 (10.6) years (range 25-65 years). There were 147 males and 41 females in the study.

There were 94 patients in both groups. The mean (SD) visual analogue score for the ease of intubation was 7.4 (0.65) in the injection group and 5.9 (0.8) in the placebo group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean (SD) length of ileum visualized was 14.4 (3.3) cm in the injection group and 10.4 (2.7) cm in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The mean (SD) visual analogue score for ease of visualization of the terminal ileum was 7.5 (0.69) in the injection group and 5.9 (0.7) in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The mean (SD) pain score experienced by the patients was 6.5 (0.7) in the injection group and 6.7 (0.69) in the placebo group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.008).

The effect of the drug on the vital parameters is shown in Table 2. Although the pulse rate increased significantly in patients receiving the drug, no statistically significant difference was noted in the oxygen saturation between the two groups either before or after administration of the drug.

Table 2 Effect of hyoscine N-butyl bromide on the vital parameters mean ± SD.
DrugPlaceboP
Pulse rate before administration85.7 (4.7)85.6 (3.8)NS
Pulse rate after procedure93.2 (4.9)86.5 (3.9)< 0.001
Highest pulse rate achieved
before ileoscopy9492
Highest pulse rate achieved
during ileoscopy10292
Po2 before administration95.4 (1.5)95 (1.3)NS
Po2 after administration94.4 (1.8)94.6 (1.7)NS
Minimum Po2 before ileoscopy9294NS
Minimum Po2 during ileoscopy9090NS
DISCUSSION

Colonoscopy remains the procedure of choice for most diseases of the large bowel[1]. Although colonoscopy is performed routinely for suspected abnormalities of the colon[1], ileoscopy is not commonly employed in the work-up of patients with ileocolonic abnormalities[3]. Despite the fact that a number of studies have demonstrated the utility of retrograde ileoscopy during colonoscopic examination of the large bowel[7-22], a recent study speculated that perceived difficulty of ileal intubation, time constraints, and the expectation of a low diagnostic yield are the likely reasons for the resistance on the part of the endoscopists in attempting retrograde ileoscopy[3].

We did not study the success of terminal ileal intubation in the two groups as the rate of terminal ileal intubation is high in the hands of the experienced and motivated endoscopists. However, the results of the present study were encouraging and hyoscine butyl bromide injection was noted to have a salutary effect on all the parameters evaluated in the study, including the ease of terminal ileal intubation and the length of the terminal ileum visualized. This should be helpful in motivating endoscopists to perform retrograde terminal ileoscopy. Even the patients perceived the procedure to be less painful when hyoscine butyl bromide was administered. Moreover, adverse effects were not observed, although the patients receiving the drug had significant tachycardia compared to those receiving placebo (Table 2).

Injection of hyoscine butyl bromide has been utilized to achieve aperistalsis in patients undergoing ERCP. However, its role in colonoscopy is not very clear[24-28]. It should be noted that in the present study we did not use it till we achieved cecal intubation and visualized the ileocecal valve, suggesting that it should not be used to facilitate colonoscopy but only to make ileoscopy easier for the endoscopist and patients. An earlier study noted the drug is a useful adjunct in intubating the terminal ileum during routine colonoscopy[23].

Glucagon has been used in lieu of hyoscine butyl bromide for achieving aperistalsis in patients undergoing ERCP[29,30]. Glucagon has also been evaluated as an adjunct in facilitating colonoscopy[31,32]. Whether glucagon can be used in lieu of hyoscine butyl bromide in achieving ileal intubation in patients undergoing colonoscopy, remains to be studied. However, since the action of glucagon and hyoscine butyl bromide are similar, and glucagons has been used instead of hyoscine, to achieve aperistalsis during ERCP, we do not foresee any reason why glucagons cannot replace hyoscine. Although the side effects of glucagon are less, the cost is a prohibitive factor in its routine use, especially in the developing countries.

A few earlier studies have raised concern about the adverse changes in the vital parameters following administration of hyoscine butyl bromide[25,27] although not all studies observed such changes[24,26]. However, we did not observe any untoward incident or adverse changes in the vital parameters in this study, which might be due to the very short time required between administration of the drug and completion of the ileoscopy. It is important to remember that hyoscine butyl bromide or saline injection was administered only when the ileocaecal valve could be identified and the endoscopist was prepared to intubate the terminal ileum.

We have noted that retrograde terminal ileoscopy is a useful investigation in patients with ileocolonic tuberculosis[33] and can diagnose the cause of hematochezia in patients in whom an earlier colonoscopic examination fails to reveal any abnormality[34]. Obtaining blind biopsies from normal appearing cecum and terminal ileum could yield a positive diagnosis in a select group of patients suspected of having ileocecal tuberculosis[22]. The use of hyoscine butyl bromide injection would make the procedure easier and it is expected that more endoscopists would perform retrograde terminal ileoscopy while performing colonoscopy.

Footnotes

S- Editor Liu Y L- Editor Wang XL E- Editor Che YB

References
1.  Cappell MS, Friedel D. The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: endoscopic findings, therapy, and complications. Med Clin North Am. 2002;86:1253-1288.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for the training and assessment of trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2001.  Available from: http://www.BSG.org.uk/sections/endoscopy.htm.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Cherian S, Singh P. Is routine ileoscopy useful? An observational study of procedure times, diagnostic yield, and learning curve. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:2324-2329.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 64]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Angtuaco TL, Reddy SK, Drapkin S, Harrell LE, Howden CW. The utility of urgent colonoscopy in the evaluation of acute lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding: a 2-year experience from a single center. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1782-1785.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Jensen DM, Machicado GA. Diagnosis and treatment of severe hematochezia. The role of urgent colonoscopy after purge. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:1569-1574.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Ohyama T, Sakurai Y, Ito M, Daito K, Sezai S, Sato Y. Analysis of urgent colonoscopy for lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Digestion. 2000;61:189-192.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 77]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Coremans G, Rutgeerts P, Geboes K, Van den Oord J, Ponette E, Vantrappen G. The value of ileoscopy with biopsy in the diagnosis of intestinal Crohn's disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1984;30:167-172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Börsch G, Schmidt G. Endoscopy of the terminal ileum. Diagnostic yield in 400 consecutive examinations. Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;28:499-501.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Kundrotas LW, Clement DJ, Kubik CM, Robinson AB, Wolfe PA. A prospective evaluation of successful terminal ileum intubation during routine colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:544-546.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Zwas FR, Bonheim NA, Berken CA, Gray S. Diagnostic yield of routine ileoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1441-1443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Geboes K, Ectors N, D'Haens G, Rutgeerts P. Is ileoscopy with biopsy worthwhile in patients presenting with symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease? Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:201-206.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 136]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 161]  [Article Influence: 6.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Halligan S, Saunders B, Williams C, Bartram C. Adult Crohn disease: can ileoscopy replace small bowel radiology? Abdom Imaging. 1998;23:117-121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Tribl B, Turetschek K, Mostbeck G, Schneider B, Stain C, Pötzi R, Gangl A, Vogelsang H. Conflicting results of ileoscopy and small bowel double-contrast barium examination in patients with Crohn's disease. Endoscopy. 1998;30:339-344.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Marshall JK, Hewak J, Farrow R, Wright C, Riddell RH, Somers S, Irvine EJ. Terminal ileal imaging with ileoscopy versus small-bowel meal with pneumocolon. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;27:217-222.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Lewis BS. Ileoscopy should be part of standard colonoscopy: a comparison of radiographic and endoscopic evaluation of the ileum. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;31:103-104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Bhasin DK, Goenka MK, Dhavan S, Dass K, Singh K. Diagnostic value of ileoscopy: a report from India. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;31:144-146.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Varanasi RV, Fleisher AS, Darwin PE, King CE, Haluszka O. Colonoscopic sclerotherapy of ileal varices. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:109-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Leung VK, Tang WL, Cheung CH, Lai MS. Importance of ileoscopy during colonoscopy for the early diagnosis of ileal tuberculosis: report of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:813-815.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Yusoff IF, Ormonde DG, Hoffman NE. Routine colonic mucosal biopsy and ileoscopy increases diagnostic yield in patients undergoing colonoscopy for diarrhea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:276-280.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Morini S, Lorenzetti R, Stella F, Martini MT, Hassan C, Zullo A. Retrograde ileoscopy in chronic nonbloody diarrhea: a prospective, case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1512-1515.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Misra SP, Dwivedi M, Misra V, Gupta M. Ileal varices and portal hypertensive ileopathy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:778-783.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Misra SP, Dwivedi M, Misra V, Gupta M, Kunwar BK. Endoscopic biopsies from normal-appearing terminal ileum and cecum in patients with suspected colonic tuberculosis. Endoscopy. 2004;36:612-616.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Ansari A, Soon SY, Saunders BP, Sanderson JD. A prospective study of the technical feasibility of ileoscopy at colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;38:1184-1186.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Saunders BP, Williams CB. Premedication with intravenous antispasmodic speeds colonoscope insertion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:209-211.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Marshall JB, Patel M, Mahajan RJ, Early DS, King PD, Banerjee B. Benefit of intravenous antispasmodic (hyoscyamine sulfate) as premedication for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:720-726.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Shaheen NJ, Robertson DJ, Crosby MA, Furs SJ, May DT, Harlan WR, Grimm IS, Isaacs KL, Bozymski EM. Hyoscyamine as a pharmacological adjunct in colonoscopy: a randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:2905-2908.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Mui LM, Ng EK, Chan KC, Ng CS, Yeung AC, Chan SK, Wong SK, Chung SC. Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of intravenously administered hyoscine N-butyl bromide in patients undergoing colonoscopy with patient-controlled sedation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:22-27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Yoong KY, Perkin D, Portal J, Strickland I, Heymann T. Intravenous hyoscine as a premedication for colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2004;36:720-722.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Van Dam J, Catalano MF, Ferguson DR, Barnes DS, Zuccaro G, Sivak MV. A prospective, double-blind trial of somatostatin analog (octreotide) versus glucagon for the inhibition of small intestinal motility during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:321-324.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Lahoti S, Catalano MF, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ. A prospective, double-blind trial of L-hyoscyamine versus glucagon for the inhibition of small intestinal motility during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46:139-142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Norfleet RG. Premedication for colonoscopy: randomized, double-blind study of glucagon versus placebo. Gastrointest Endosc. 1978;24:164-165.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Cutler CS, Rex DK, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Does routine intravenous glucagon administration facilitate colonoscopy? A randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:346-350.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Misra SP, Misra V, Dwivedi M. Ileoscopy in patients with ileocolonic tuberculosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:1723-1727.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Misra SP, Dwivedi M, Misra V. Ileoscopy in 39 hematochezia patients with normal colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3101-3104.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]