Clinical Research Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 15, 2004; 10(12): 1795-1797
Published online Jun 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i12.1795
Investigation of regurgitation and other symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in Indonesian infants
Badriul Hegar, Aswitha Boediarso, Agus Firmansyah, Department of Pediatrics, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Yvan Vandenplas, Department of Pediatrics, Academisch Ziekenhuis Vrije UniversiteitBrussel, Brussels, Belgium
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Yvan Vandenplas, Department of Pediatrics, Academic Children’s Hospital, VUB, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium. yvan.vandenplas@az.vub.ac.be
Telephone: +32-24775780 Fax: +32-24775783
Received: September 9, 2003
Revised: November 23, 2003
Accepted: December 1, 2003
Published online: June 15, 2004

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the incidence of regurgitation and other symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in Indonesian infants.

METHODS: In a cross-sectional study at the University Outpatient Clinic for vaccination in Jakarta, 138 mothers of healthy infants less than 12-mo old were prospectively asked to report the frequency of regurgitation.

RESULTS: Whatever the age was, some infants did not regurgitate (from 10% during the first month of life to 67% in 1-year-old infants). Regurgitation of at least once a day was reported in 77% of infants younger than 3 mo. Daily regurgitation decreased to 12% in the 9-12 mo old group. Reported peak prevalence was 81% (26/32) during the first month of life. Regurgitation decreased sharply between the 4-6 and 7-9 mo old groups (from 44% to 9%). The longer the regurgitation persisted, the more frequently the mother perceived regurgitation as a problem. Volume and frequency of regurgitation, back arching, irritability, crying and refusal of feeding were the symptoms causing maternal anxiety. The longer the regurgitation persisted, the more frequently the mothers viewed it as a health problem.

CONCLUSION: Regurgitation occurs frequently in Indonesian infants, and is a frequent cause of concern to mothers.




INTRODUCTION

Regurgitation is the effortless return of gastric contents into the mouth, and the most common symptom of infantile gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Few attempts have been made to determine the prevalence of regurgitation and its natural course in infants. In the Western world, evaluation of the natural progression of symptoms of GER at any age has become virtually impossible because of widespread self-treatment and a lack of medical referral. It is not clear how important genetic, racial and ethnic factors may be in the clinical presentation, the prevalence and the natural history of GER disease. In the Eastern part of the world, it is commonly thought that regurgitation is less frequent than in the United States and Europe. For these reasons, determining the prevalence of GER in Indonesian infants is of interest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from mothers bringing their healthy infants to the Outpatient Clinic of the Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, for routine immunization. All infants were born at term and in good general health with adequate nutritional status (P50-97 NCHS). Most of the mothers were from the middle-low socioeconomic class and worked as housewives. The data were obtained by prospectively interviewing mothers using a standard questionnaire about the prevalence of regurgitation during the previous two wk and other descriptive information.

The same author (BH) interviewed 138 consecutive mothers, presenting to the outpatient clinic of one of the local authors. Each interview lasted for 15 to 20 min. All mothers agreed to participate in the study. Age distribution of the infants is listed in Table 1. There were 75 male and 63 female infants. Mothers were asked the number of episodes of regurgitation per day, and whether they considered regurgitation as a health problem, whether the frequency or volume of emesis was a health problem and whether the infant had such symptoms as crying, back arching, irritability, or refusal to feed, as well as whether the symptoms had an adverse impact on the baby’s quality of life.

Table 1 Age distribution of studied infants.
Age (mo)Infants (n)
0-374
4-634
7-921
10-129
Total138

The two-tailed unpaired t-test was used, statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Table 2 summarizes the prevalence and frequency of regurgitation in the infants by month of age. Up to the age of 3 mo, about half of the infants regurgitated more than two times a day, the number was slightly higher in the first mo of life and smaller at 3 mo. In the group regurgitating 1 to 4 times a day, there was a sharp decrease in the number of episodes of regurgitation to almost zero by the age of 7 to 8 mo. Twenty-five percent of the infants regurgitated more than 4 times a day during the first month of life, but from the age of 6 mo all infants regurgitated less than 4 times a day. Table 3 shows the number of mothers who were concerned about regurgitation. The evolution of concern was inversely related to the persistence of regurgitation. During the first month of life, many infants regurgitated, and few mothers expressed their concerns. However, the mothers of older infants with persistent vomiting became concerned about the symptom. Among infants regurgitating more than once a day, about 40% of the mothers asked for medical advice about the symptom. The reasons for maternal concern are listed in Table 4, and included the excessive volume and frequency of regurgitation, and symptoms suggesting a decreased quality of life of the infants such as food refusal, crying, back arching and irritability. The volume of regurgitation was less frequently considered as a problem than the frequency of regurgitation (9% vs 66%). Crying and irritability were the second most frequent reasons for concern among the mothers (57%). Food refusal and back arching were reported as reasons for concern in 26% and 20%, respectively. Mothers of regurgitating infants estimated their infants had an impaired quality of life (75 vs 15 %, P < 0.05). Infants of unconcerned mothers had much less frequent symptoms than infants of concerned mother (P < 0.05).

Table 2 Daily frequency of regurgitation in 138 healthy infants.
Age (mo)InfantsDaily frequency of regurgitation (%)
0< 11-4> 4
1323 (10)3 (10)18 (55)8 (25)
2253 (12)2 (8)13 (15)7 (28)
3175 (29)1 (6)8 (47)3 (18)
4106 (60)1 (10)3 (30)0 (0)
5143 (21)2 (15)6 (43)3 (21)
6106 (60)1 (10)3 (30)0 (0)
7106 (60)2 (20)2 (20)0 (0)
831 (33)2 (67)0 (0)0 (0)
988 (10)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
1054 (80)0 (0)1 (20)0 (0)
1111 (100)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
1232 (67)1 (33)0 (0)0 (0)
13848 (35)15 (11)54 (39%)21 (15%)
Table 3 Number of mothers considering regurgitation as a health problem.
Daily regurgitation frequency (%)
< 11-4> 4
With concern324835 (25)
Without concern6 03013103 (75)
Table 4 Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and number of mothers showing concern.
Symptomn (%)
Crying and irritability20 (57)
Food refusal9 (26)
Back arching7 (20)
Excessive frequency of regurgitation23 (66)
Excessive volume of regurgitation3 (9)
DISCUSSION

Recent studies have suggested that GER may in part be genetically determined. Thus, its prevalence and severity might be expected to vary according to racial or ethnic background. Radiology is not recommended in the diagnosis of GER. The radiological method of GER evaluation showed a specificity of 50% and a sensitivity of 29%, as compared to 24-h pH monitoring[1]. A genetic influence on the prevalence of GER was supported by the finding that GER symptoms are more frequently encountered in the relatives of GER disease patients[2]. Moreover, the concordance for GER is higher in monozygotic than dizygotic twins[3]. A locus on chromosome 13q, between microsatellite D13S171 and D13S263, has been linked with severe GER in 5 families with multigenerational histories[4], but the same abnormal locus was not found in 5 other families, possibly due to the genetic heterogeneity of GER and different clinical presentations among patients studied[5]. The incidence of hiatal hernia was reported to be much lower in Korea (1.4%) than in Western world (2.3%-50%)[6]. Several studies have confirmed the familial segregation of hiatal hernia, Barrett’s esophagus, esophageal carcinoma and GER.

There are only a few studies that have attempted to describe the natural history of GER in children. In some of these studies, infantile GER was excluded[7]. Orenstein developed a questionnaire to identify infants with GER[8]. At least regurgitation occurred once a day in half of 0- to 3-mo-old white non-Hispanic infants, and increased up to two thirds at 4 mo and decreased to 5% at 10-12 mo of age[9]. Daily regurgitation was present in 50% of infants younger than 3 mo, in more than 66% at 4 mo, but only in 5% at 1 year of age[8-10]. Nelson and coworkers documented the prevalence of regurgitation in a white non-Hispanic infant population in USA[9]. However, as the authors stated, their findings could not be generalized and investigations of different racial/ethnic and socioeconomic groups are needed to determine differences in prevalence of symptoms in other populations. Also in Japanese infants, regurgitation was common and decreased with age[11].

Our questionnaire intended to report the incidence of regurgitation, not of symptoms suggesting gastro-esophageal reflux (disease). Regurgitation occurred frequently in our small sample size of Indonesian infants. The sample size was relatively small for an epidemiological survey. In fact, the prevalence of regurgitation in our population was the highest ever reported. In the study by Nelson and coworkers, the prevalence of regurgitation peaked at 4 mo of age[9], whereas in our population the prevalence was highest during the first month of life. In a study from northern India, the prevalence of regurgitation in 1-6-mo-old infants was 55%[12]. In our study, 75% of 0-6-mo-old infants regurgitated at least once a day.

Complete resolution of regurgitation was the most common outcome in infant reflux, with a resolution by 10 mo of age in 55%, by 18 mo of age in 60%-80% and by 2 years of age in 98%[13,14] In the study by Nelson and coworkers, and in our study, regurgitation was almost completely disappeared by 7 mo[9]. In 6-12-mo old infants, the prevalence of regurgitation was 15% in North India[12], which was similar to the findings in our population if all infants regurgitating at least once per day were considered. If the infants regurgitating less than once a day were included, then the prevalence of regurgitation among 6-12-mo old Indonesian infants was as high as 30%. In all studies evaluating the natural evolution of infant regurgitation, there was a sharp decline around 6-7 mo towards a disappearance at the age of 12 mo[9,12,15].

According to epidemiological data from France, Australia and the United States, excessive regurgitation was a cause of concern and medical consult in about 25% of parents[8-10]. Spilling in infancy was very common, but the majority of children settled by 13 to 14 mo of age. However, those with frequent spilling (> 90 d) were more likely to have GER symptoms at 9 years of age[16]. Esophagitis occurred in one quarter of infants with persistent distress[17]. There was a subgroup of otherwise healthy infants, presenting with wheeze and/or stridor, who had isolated swallowing dysfunction and silent aspiration as the cause of their respiratory symptoms[18]. Our findings were similar, 30% of the mothers showed concern over regurgitation. Symptoms causing parental perception that regurgitation might be a problem were comparable in both studies, and included the volume and frequency of regurgitation and symptoms suggesting decreased quality of life such as crying, back-arching and irritability[9]. Parental reports about reflux-related behaviors were similar in Nelson’s study and in ours[9]. Despite the concern of parents, pediatricians generally stated that intervention was not needed[19]. Although a prospective follow-up of 63 regurgitating infants reported a complete disappearance of regurgitation by 12 mo of age, it is interesting that these same infants were reported on a long-term follow-up to have a significant increase in feeding refusal, prolonged eating time, parental distress about feeding and impaired quality of life when compared to non-regurgitating controls[15].

In conclusion, the severity and incidence of GOR were significantly higher in symptomatic than asymptomatic infants[20]. Food allergy might be common in regurgitating infants[21,22]. Recommendations for a diagnostic workup have been published[23,24]. Hydrolysates might treat regurgitation by improving gastric emptying[25]. GER frequently caused apnea in infants[26,27]. GER and regurgitation decreased the quality of life[28] in infants, and increasesd hospital stay and cost[29,30]. Worldwide, racial differences in the prevalence and persistence of infantile regurgitation seem minimal. Regurgitation in Indonesian infants tends to be very frequent, with more than 75% of 0-3-mo-old infants regurgitating at least once a day. Symptoms viewed as being related to GER and causing maternal concern are also similar. For one in three mothers worldwide, the symptom of regurgitation is a cause for concern. Mothers in Indonesia are no exception.

Footnotes

Edited by Wang XL and Xu JY Proofread by Xu FM

References
1.  Aksglaede K, Pedersen JB, Lange A, Funch-Jensen P, Thommesen P. Gastro-esophageal reflux demonstrated by radiography in infants less than 1 year of age. Comparison with pH monitoring. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:136-138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Trudgill NJ, Kapur KC, Riley SA. Familial clustering of reflux symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1172-1178.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 81]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Cameron AJ, Lagergren J, Henriksson C, Nyren O, Locke GR, Pedersen NL. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:55-59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 174]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 179]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Hu FZ, Preston RA, Post JC, White GJ, Kikuchi LW, Wang X, Leal SM, Levenstien MA, Ott J, Self TW. Mapping of a gene for severe pediatric gastroesophageal reflux to chromosome 13q14. JAMA. 2000;284:325-334.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 88]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Orenstein SR, Shalaby TM, Barmada MM, Whitcomb DC. Genetics of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;34:506-510.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Kim E. Hiatus hernia and diverticulum of the colon: their low incidence in Korea. N Engl J Med. 1964;271:764-768.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Ashorn M, Ruuska T, Karikoski R, Laippala P. The natural course of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:638-641.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Orenstein SR, Shalaby TM, Cohn JF. Reflux symptoms in 100 normal infants: diagnostic validity of the infant gastroesophageal reflux questionnaire. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1996;35:607-614.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 128]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 108]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Nelson SP, Chen EH, Syniar GM, Christoffel KK. Prevalence of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux during infancy. A pediatric practice-based survey. Pediatric Practice Research Group. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:569-572.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 410]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 335]  [Article Influence: 12.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Chouhou D, Rossignol C, Bernard F, Dupont C. [Gastroesophageal reflux in screening centers in children under 4 years of age]. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1992;49:843.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Miyazawa R, Tomomasa T, Kaneko H, Tachibana A, Ogawa T, Morikawa A. Prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux-related symptoms in Japanese infants. Pediatr Int. 2002;44:513-516.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  De S, Rajeshwari K, Kalra KK, Gondal R, Malhotra V, Mittal SK. Gastrooesophageal reflux in infants and children in north India. Trop Gastroenterol. 2001;22:99-102.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Carrè I. The natural history of the partial thoracic stomach ("hiatal hernia") in children. Arch Dis Child. 1959;34:344-353.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 165]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 168]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Shepherd RW, Wren J, Evans S, Lander M, Ong TH. Gastroesophageal reflux in children. Clinical profile, course and outcome with active therapy in 126 cases. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1987;26:55-60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Nelson SP, Chen EH, Syniar GM, Christoffel KK. One-year follow-up of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux during infancy. Pediatric Practice Research Group. Pediatrics. 1998;102:E67.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 155]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 152]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Martin AJ, Pratt N, Kennedy JD, Ryan P, Ruffin RE, Miles H, Marley J. Natural history and familial relationships of infant spilling to 9 years of age. Pediatrics. 2002;109:1061-1067.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 178]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 175]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Heine RG, Cameron DJ, Chow CW, Hill DJ, Catto-Smith AG. Esophagitis in distressed infants: poor diagnostic agreement between esophageal pH monitoring and histopathologic findings. J Pediatr. 2002;140:14-19.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Sheikh S, Allen E, Shell R, Hruschak J, Iram D, Castile R, McCoy K. Chronic aspiration without gastroesophageal reflux as a cause of chronic respiratory symptoms in neurologically normal infants. Chest. 2001;120:1190-1195.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 88]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Aggett PJ, Agostoni C, Goulet O, Hernell O, Koletzko B, Lafeber HL, Michaelsen KF, Milla P, Rigo J, Weaver LT. Antireflux or antiregurgitation milk products for infants and young children: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;34:496-498.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Thomas EJ, Kumar R, Dasan JB, Chandrashekar N, Agarwala S, Tripathi M, Bal CS. Radionuclide scintigraphy in the evaluation of gastro-oesophageal reflux in post-operative oesophageal atresia and tracheo-oesophageal fistula patients. Nucl Med Commun. 2003;24:317-320.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Hill DJ, Hosking CS, Heine RG. Clinical spectrum of food allergy in children in Australia and South-East Asia: identification and targets for treatment. Ann Med. 1999;31:272-281.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Salvatore S, Vandenplas Y. Gastroesophageal reflux and cow milk allergy: is there a link. Pediatrics. 2002;110:972-984.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 84]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 85]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Vandenplas Y. Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants and children. World J Gastroenterol. 1999;5:375-382.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Gold BD. Review article: epidemiology and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19:22-27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Garzi A, Messina M, Frati F, Carfagna L, Zagordo L, Belcastro M, Parmiani S, Sensi L, Marcucci F. An extensively hydrolysed cow's milk formula improves clinical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and reduces the gastric emptying time in infants. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2002;30:36-41.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Sheikh S, Stephen TC, Sisson B. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in infants with recurrent brief apneic episodes. Can Respir J. 1999;6:401-404.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Wenzl TG, Silny J, Schenke S, Peschgens T, Heimann G, Skopnik H. Gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory phenomena in infants: status of the intraluminal impedance technique. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999;28:423-428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 94]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 98]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Khalaf MN, Porat R, Brodsky NL, Bhandari V. Clinical correlations in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit with varying severity of gastroesophageal reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;32:45-49.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Ferlauto JJ, Walker MW, Martin MS. Clinically significant gastroesophageal reflux in the at-risk premature neonate: relation to cognitive scores, days in the NICU, and total hospital charges. J Perinatol. 1998;18:455-459.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Frakaloss G, Burke G, Sanders MR. Impact of gastroesophageal reflux on growth and hospital stay in premature infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;26:146-150.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]