Clinical Research Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. May 15, 2004; 10(10): 1504-1507
Published online May 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i10.1504
Biochemical and radiological predictors of malignant biliary strictures
Ibrahim A. Al-Mofleh, Abdulrahman M. Aljebreen, Saleh M. Al-Amri, Rashed S. Al-Rashed, Faleh Z. Al-Faleh, Hussein M. Al-Freihi, Ayman A. Abdo, Gastroenterology Division, department of Medicine (38), King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Arthur C. Isnani, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine and Research Center (74), PO Box 2925, Riyadh 11461, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Professor Ibrahim A. Al-Mofleh, Gastroenterology Division, Department of Medicine (38), King Khalid University Hospital, PO Box 2925, Riyadh 11461, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Telephone: +966-467-1215 Fax: +966-467-1217
Received: November 22, 2003
Revised: January 2, 2004
Accepted: January 9, 2004
Published online: May 15, 2004

Abstract

AIM: Differentiation of benign biliary strictures (BBS) from malignant biliary strictures (MBS) remains difficult despite improvement in imaging and endoscopic techniques. The aim of this study was to identify the clinical, biochemical and or radiological predictors of malignant biliary strictures.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all charts of patients who had biliary strictures (BS) on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous cholangiography (PTC) in case of unsuccessful ERCP from March 1998 to August 2002. Patient characteristics, clinical features, biochemical, radiological and biopsy results were all recorded. Stricture etiology was determined based on cytology, biopsy or clinical follow-up. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to determine the optimal laboratory diagnostic criterion threshold in predicting MBS.

RESULTS: One hundred twenty six patients with biliary strictures were enrolled, of which 72 were malignant. The mean age for BBS was 53 years compared to 62.4 years for MBS (P = 0.0006). Distal bile duct stricture was mainly due to a malignant process 48.6% vs 9% (P = 0.001). Alkaline phosphates and AST levels were more significantly elevated in MBS (P = 0.0002). ROC curve showed that a bilirubin level of 84 μmol/L or more was the most predictive of MBS with a sensitivity of 98.6%, specificity of 59.3% and a positive likelihood ratio of 2.42 (95%CI: 0.649-0.810). Proximal biliary dilatation was more frequently encountered in MBS compared to BBS, 73.8% vs 39.5% (P = 0.0001). Majority of BBS (87%) and MBS (78%) were managed endoscopically.

CONCLUSION: A serum bilirubin level of 84 μmol/L or greater is the best predictor of MBS. Older age, proximal biliary dilatation, higher levels of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, ALT and AST are all associated with MBS. ERCP is necessary to diagnose and treat benign and malignant biliary strictures.




INTRODUCTION

Biliary stricture (BS) may result from an intra or extra-luminal benign or malignant process. Although history, laboratory investigations and imaging techniques may help to differentiate benign from malignant biliary strictures, it remains a clinical challenge. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been considered the method of choice for the diagnosis of BS as a result of its accuracy in establishing the site and cholangiographic features of stricture[1]. Cytology specimens can be obtained, which has a sensitivity rate of only 35% but a specificity rate approaching 100% for the diagnosis of malignancy[2].

Recently, new imaging techniques with increased diagnostic yield have emerged. For instance, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as a non-invasive method has similar or even better diagnostic yield with the advantage of avoiding complications of ERCP[1,3,4]. Also, with the advent of multislice CT (MS-CT), it has been possible to detect minute biliary and pancreatic tumours as well as small lymph nodes and vessels[5]. MS-CT cholangiography has become valuable in pre-operative evaluation and determining unresectability[6]. Therefore, CT has maintained as the method of choice for pancreatic and biliary tumours imaging[7,8]. Furthermore, intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) has been valuable in the differentiation of MBS from BBS. It has increased the accuracy of ERC-tissue sampling, but it has not been suitable for staging lymphadenopathy-associated MBS[8].

The aim of this study was to identify the clinical, biochemical and or radiological predictors of malignant biliary strictures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with biliary strictures from March 1998 to August 2002 who had ERCP or PTC in case of unsuccessful ERCP were included. Demographic characteristics, presenting features, laboratory data, imaging technique findings and management modalities were analyzed.

Definition of biliary strictures was suggested by cholangiographic features and it was supported by brush cytology, fine needle aspiration (FNA), the presence of mass or metastases by imaging and or clinical follow-up.

ERCP was performed by three experienced gastroenterologists using 4.2 mm channel duodenoscopes (Pentax or Olympus). All patients received diazepam and demerol as premedication. In addition, patients with biliary dilatation received cefuroxime prophylaxis. Endoscopic and cholangiographic findings were recorded.

Biopsy and brushing materials were obtained when feasible, strictures dilated with balloon or Soehendra dilator and large 10-12 F stent inserted.

Data collected were entered into the computer using Microsoft Excel. After all data were checked for completeness, statistical analysis was performed using Stat Pac gold analysis software and Microsoft Excel programs. Two-tailed P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to determine the optimal laboratory diagnostic criterion threshold (i.e. total bilirubin, ALT, AST and alkaline phosphatase) in predicting a malignant biliary stricture. A ROC curve displayed the false positive rate on the x axis (specificity), and the true positive rate on the y axis (sensitivity) for varying test thresholds, thus plotting the performance of a diagnostic test[10]. The ideal cut-off criteria for the laboratory results were chosen by determining the point lying geometrically closest to an ideal test with 100% specificity and sensitivity[11].

RESULTS

One hundred twenty six patients were included, 54 of those had a BBS while 72 had a MBS. The main causes of BBS were related to stone disease (choledocholithiasis, Mirizzi syndrome or postcholecystectomy). In 22 patients the cause could not be identified. Cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic head carcinoma were the most common causes of MBS. Other causes of BS are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Causes of biliary strictures (n = 126).
Benignn%Malignantn%
Choledocholithiasis1222Cholangiocarcinoma3143
Mirizzi syndrome713Pancreatic head CA2332
Postcholecystectomy611Ampullary CA57
Sclerosing cholangitis35.5Gallbladder CA57
Choledochal cyst23.7Metastatic CA45.5
Chronic pancreatitis11.9Hepatocellular CA22.7
Juxtapapillary11.9Lymphoma22.7
diverticulum
Non-specified2240.7
TOTAL54TOTAL72

The mean age of patients with MBS (62.4 ± 11.7 years) was significantly higher than that of patients with BBS (53 ± 18 years) (P = 0.0006). Fifty percent of BBS were proximal (P = 0.01) and approximately 50% of MBS were distal (P < 0.001). There were no significant gender differences (Table 2). Jaundice was found in more than 80% of patients with BBS and MBS, and right upper quadrant (RUQ) pain in 50% of patients. Anorexia, weight loss and fever were less common and no significant differences were observed when both groups were compared (Table 3).

Table 2 Demographic data of patients with biliary strictures (n = 126).
BenignMalignantP value
Number of patients54 (%)72 (%)
Mean age53 ± 1862.4 ± 11.70.0006
Males25 (46)41 (56.9)0.2255
Females29 (54)31 (43.1)0.2255
Sites of biliary stricture
Proximal27 (50)20 (27.7)0.0107
Middle22 (41)17 (23.6)0.0394
Distal5 (9)35 (48.6)< 0.001
Table 3 Presenting symptoms of patients with biliary stric-tures (n = 126).
Benign n = 54 (%)Malignant n = 72 (%)P value
Jaundice44 (81)61 (84.7)0.5884
RUQ pain27 (50)38 (52.8)0.7561
Weight loss4 (7)11 (15.3)0.1326
Fever3 (5)7 (9.7)0.3066
Anorexia4 (7)7 (9.7)0.5843

Mean serum values of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, ALT and AST were significantly higher in patients with MBS. However GGT levels were not significantly different in both groups (Table 4).

Table 4 Laboratory data of patients with biliary strictures (n = 126).
Benign n = 54Malignant n = 72P value
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)142.6 ± 98.4184.61 ± 120.80.0389
Direct bilirubin (μmol/L)102.4 ± 95.3138.10 ± 98.50.0433
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)108.5 ± 48.5145.50 ± 57.50.0002
GGT (IU/L)397.0 ± 496.5436.50 ± 325.10.591
ALT (IU/L)52.7 ± 38.366.94 ± 35.60.0339
AST (IU/L)76.5 ± 43.2107.80 ± 45.70.0002

As shown in Table 5 and Figure 1, ROC analysis identified total bilirubin of 84 μmol/L as the best cut-off value for predicting a malignant biliary stricture with a sensitivity of 98.6%, a specificity of 59.3% and a positive likelihood ratio of 2.42 (area under the curve = 0.735, SE = 0.044, 95%CI: 0.649-0.810). On the other hand, ROC analysis showed that other laboratory tests including ALT, AST and alkaline phosphates to have a poor sensitivity and specificity.

Figure 1
Figure 1 ROC analysis of total bilirubin.
Table 5 Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) test results in predicting malignant biliary strictures.
ParameterCut-off valueSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)+LR-LR
Total bilirubin (μmol/L)8498.659.32.420.02
Direct bilirubin (μmol/L)6391.761.12.360.14
Alkaline13659.783.33.580.48
phosphatase (IU/L)
GGT (IU/L)24680.653.71.740.36
ALT (IU/L)6845.881.52.470.66
AST (IU/L)8576.474.12.950.32

Proximal biliary dilatation was more frequently encountered in MBS compared to BBS, 73.8% vs 39.5% (P = 0.0001). Majority of patients, 87% of BBS and 78% of MBS were treated endoscopically.

DISCUSSION

The differentiation between benign and malignant biliary strictures can be difficult but is of obvious importance in regard to prognosis and planning optimal therapy.

In our study, majority of patients with BS presented with obstructive jaundice and half had right upper quadrant pain. Other less frequent symptoms included anorexia, weight loss and fever. In contrast to Tandon et al[12], who have encountered more anorexia and weight loss in MBS, we found no significant difference between MBS and BBS. This could be due to the early stage at presentation in our patients.

In our study, although statistically significant differences were found in most biochemical parameters, bilirubin was the best predictor of malignant biliary stricture. A serum bilirubin level of 84 μmol/L or greater was highly predictive of malignant biliary stricture with a sensitivity of 98.6%, a specificity of 59.3% and a positive likelihood ratio of 2.42. Furthermore, proximal biliary dilatation was more frequently encountered in MBS compared to BBS, 73.8% vs 39.5% (P = 0.0001). Similarly, in a prospective study of 29 patients, Bain et al[13] have shown that a bilirubin of level of 75 μmol/L or greater or a stricture length of greater than 14 mm was highly predictive of malignant biliary stricture. In the same study, intrahepatic duct dilatation was present in 93% of malignant strictures versus 36% of BBS (P = 0.002).

In our study, we found that distal bile duct strictures were mainly due to a malignant process, 48.6% vs 9% in BBS (P < 0.001), which is contrary to other studies. This is probably because we have rarely encountered BBS secondary to chronic pancreatitis which is commonly present with distal benign BS (we had only one patient).

ERCP remains to be an important imaging technique in the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive jaundice[14]. The yield of ERCP in differentiating MBS from BBS can be further improved with tissue sampling. Sensitivity of biliary fluid and brushing cytology is unsatisfactorily low. It can be improved by combining fine needle aspiration biopsy with intraductal forceps biopsy. This method has been known as triple tissue sampling[15,16]. Despite the triple tissue sampling, the sensitivity and negative predictive value have not exceeded 62% and 39%, respectively[16]. Furthermore, brushing cytology yield could be improved by stricture brushing after a 10 F dilatation of malignant stricture[17]. Similar observation on improvement of bile cytology has been reported earlier by Mohandas et al[18]. Evaluation of cytology specimens for aneuploidy and tumour markers, CA 19-9 and CEA might also increase the diagnostic yield[19].

Recently, intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) has been evaluated in the differential diagnosis of MBS from BBS with conflicting results. While Gress et al[20] have not found reliable differentiation criteria, Inui et al and Tamada et al[21,22], who used special biliary and pancreatic probes, have provided encouraging results. However, its accuracy is still not exceeding 80%. IDUS has been reported to be superior to conventional endoscopic ultrasonography in terms of diagnostic accuracy, and prediction of tumour respectability[23].

Treatment of BS depends on the etiology, benign or malignant, magnitude of damage in post-surgical injuries and prediction of respectability of MBS. Endoscopic management of BBS has been considered the primary method before the decision of surgical intervention[24]. Major bile duct injuries require surgical construction. After initial evaluation of anatomy by direct cholangiogram and inserting a biliary drain, surgical reconstruction with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy has been associated with an overall success rate exceeding 90%[25]. It has been considered as the best treatment modality of BBS[26]. On the other hand Born et al[27] have considered endoscopic or percutaneous management as an adequate short and long-term alternative to surgery.

The decision of therapeutic modality for biliary or pancreatic tumours depends on the evaluation of respectability. It is important to determine preoperatively the spread of MBS. These events may help decide the appropriate treatment for each condition. Surgery has to be considered for the management of resectable tumours. However, at the time when the diagnosis of MBS has been established, it is often late for curable resection[28]. Therefore, endoscopic approach remains the method of choice for palliation. Majority of our patients (78%) had endoscopic palliation.

In a large series with 505 patients, Costamagna et al[29] strongly suggested ERCP in the diagnosis and palliation of all patients with suspected MBS. ERCP has been considered as the optimal technique for diagnosis and palliation of MBS[30].

In conclusion, a serum bilirubin level of 84 μmol/L or greater is the best predictor of MBS. Older age, proximal biliary dilatation, higher levels of bilirubin, alkaline phosphates, ALT and AST are all associated with MBS. ERCP is the best imaging technique in demonstrating stricture and biliary dilatation, and remains the method of choice in managing BBS and MBS.

Footnotes

Edited by Wang XL Proofread by Xu FM

References
1.  Hawes RH. Diagnostic and therapeutic uses of ERCP in pancreatic and biliary tract malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:S201-S205.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Scudera PL, Koizumi J, Jacobson IM. Brush cytology evaluation of lesions encountered during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;36:281-284.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Hall-Craggs MA, Allen CM, Owens CM, Theis BA, Donald JJ, Paley M, Wilkinson ID, Chong WK, Hatfield AR, Lees WR. MR cholangiography: clinical evaluation in 40 cases. Radiology. 1993;189:423-427.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 95]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 95]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel ED, Steinberg D, Ferucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: Comparison with en-doscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:589-597.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 212]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 220]  [Article Influence: 7.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Kim HJ, Kim MH, Lee SK, Yoo KS, Seo DW, Min YI. Tumor vessel: a valuable cholangioscopic clue of malignant biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:635-638.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 123]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 133]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  O'Malley ME, Boland GW, Wood BJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL, Mueller PR. Adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: determination of surgical unresectability with thin-section pancreatic-phase helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1513-1518.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 114]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Cha JH, Han JK, Kim TK, Kim AY, Park SJ, Choi BI, Suh KS, Kim SW, Han MC. Preoperative evaluation of Klatskin tumor: accuracy of spiral CT in determining vascular invasion as a sign of unresectability. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:500-507.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Mortele KJ, Ji H, Ros PR. CT and magnetic resonance imaging in pancreatic and biliary tract malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:S206-S212.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  Farrell RJ, Agarwal B, Brandwein SL, Underhill J, Chuttani R, Pleskow DK. Intraductal US is a useful adjunct to ERCP for distinguishing malignant from benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:681-687.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 70]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 72]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  McNeil BJ, Keller E, Adelstein SJ. Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. N Engl J Med. 1975;293:211-215.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 837]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 738]  [Article Influence: 15.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839-843.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5096]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4987]  [Article Influence: 121.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Tandon RK, Mehrotra R, Arora A, Acharya SK, Vashisht S. Biliary strictures on ERCP: a study in northern India. J Assoc Physicians India. 1994;42:865-866.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Bain VG, Abraham N, Jhangri GS, Alexander TW, Henning RC, Hoskinson ME, Maguire CG, Lalor EA, Sadowski DC. Prospective study of biliary strictures to determine the predictors of malignancy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2000;14:397-402.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Khurram M, Durrani AA, Hasan Z, Butt Au, Ashfaq S. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic evaluation of patients with obstructive jaundice. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003;13:325-328.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Fogel EL, Sherman S. How to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. Endoscopy. 1999;31:758-760.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Jailwala J, Fogel EL, Sherman S, Gottlieb K, Flueckiger J, Bucksot LG, Lehman GA. Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:383-390.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Parasher VK, Huibregtse K. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided cytology of malignant biliary strictures using a novel scraping brush. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:288-290.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Mohandas KM, Swaroop VS, Gullar SU, Dave UR, Jagannath P, DeSouza LJ. Diagnosis of malignant obstructive jaundice by bile cytology: results improved by dilating the bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:150-154.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Ryan ME, Baldauf MC. Comparison of flow cytometry for DNA content and brush cytology for detection of malignancy in pancreaticobiliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;40:133-139.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Gress F, Chen YK, Sherman S, Savides T, Zaidi S, Jaffe P, Lehman G, Wonn MJ, Hawes R. Experience with a catheter-based ultrasound probe in the bile duct and pancreas. Endoscopy. 1995;27:178-184.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 48]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Inui K, Nakazawa S, Yoshino J, Wakabayashi T, Okushima K, Nakamura Y, Hattori T, Miyoshi H. Ultrasound probes for biliary lesions. Endoscopy. 1998;30 Suppl 1:A120-A123.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Tamada K, Hagai H, Yasuda Y, Tomiyama T, Ohashi A, Wada S, Kanai N, Satoh Y, Ido K, Sugano K. Transpapillary intraductal US prior to biliary drainage in the assessment of longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:300-307.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Menzel J, Poremba C, Dietl KH, Domschke W. Preoperative diagnosis of bile duct strictures--comparison of intraductal ultrasonography with conventional endosonography. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:77-82.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 105]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Al-Karawi MA, Mohamed AELS. Endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures. Saudi Med J. 1994;15:56-60.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Lillemoe KD, Melton GB, Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Campbell KA, Talamini MA, Sauter PA, Coleman J, Yeo CJ. Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990s. Ann Surg. 2000;232:430-441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 300]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 319]  [Article Influence: 13.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Liotta G, Costa G, Lepre L, Miccini M, De Masi E, Lamazza MA, Fiori E. Management of benign biliary strictures: biliary enteric anastomosis vs endoscopic stenting. Arch Surg. 2000;135:153-157.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 84]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 93]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Born P, Rösch T, Brühl K, Sandschin W, Allescher HD, Frimberger E, Classen M. Long-term results of endoscopic and percutaneous transhepatic treatment of benign biliary strictures. Endoscopy. 1999;31:725-731.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 55]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Kuroda A, Muto T. Bile duct carcinoma without jaundice: clues to early diagnosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:1477-1483.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Costamagna G, Gabrielli A, Mutignani M, Perri V, Buononato M, Crucitti F. Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of malignant biliary strictures: review of 505 patients. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 1993;56:201-206.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Al-Mofleh IA, Al-Rashed RS, Al-Amri SM, Al-Ghamdi AS, Al-Faleh FZ, Al-Freihi HM, Isnani AC. Malignant biliary strictures. Diagnosis and management. Saudi Med J. 2003;24:1360-1363.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]