Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2021; 27(47): 8156-8165
Published online Dec 21, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i47.8156
Figure 1
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of bile duct ligation. A: Anatomy of the liver, bile duct, portal vein, and hepatic artery in mice; B: Exposure of the bile duct.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Magnetic resonance imaging findings and quantitative analysis. A: Box diagram of bile duct volume, ALT and AST in sham and BDL subgroups; B: Maximum cross-section of the bile duct or gallbladder on MRCP, T1-weighted, and T2-weighted images in sham and BDL subgroups. BDL: Bile duct ligation; MRCP: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate transaminase. aP < 0.01 for comparison between and sham and liver fibrosis subgroups.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Functional parameter changes of magnetic resonance imaging and quantitative analysis. A: Maximum cross-section of liver parenchyma on T2 mapping, pre-, and post-enhanced T1 mapping in sham and BDL subgroups; B: Box diagram of T2 value, T1 value, and ΔT1 value in sham and BDL subgroups. BDL: Bile duct ligation. aP < 0.01 for comparison between and sham and liver fibrosis subgroups.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Masson's trichrome stain of the intrahepatic bile duct and hepatic parenchyma in sham and bile duct ligation subgroups (light microscopy, 400×). BDL: Bile duct ligation.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Spearman correlation coefficients between magnetic resonance imaging parameters with hepatic fibrosis rate. ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate transaminase.