Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: A meta-analysis and meta-regression with single arm analysis

doi:10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3925

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 27, Issue 25

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7467)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

472

WORD

158

HTML

3813

Figures (1-5)

275

Tables (1-3)

262

Sum=4980

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

280

Download

434

Sum=714

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

493

Download

1280

Sum=1773

Jul 7, 2021 (publication date) through Dec 23, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (37)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2021; 27(25): 3925-3939
Published online Jul 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3925

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of included articles. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Forest plot for risk of perforation. RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Forest plot for risk of bleeding. RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Forest plot for recurrence rate. RR: Relative risk; CI: Confidence interval.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 5 Meta regression of perforation and proportion of right colon polyps. CI: Confidence interval.

Citation: Lim XC, Nistala KRY, Ng CH, Lin SY, Tan DJH, Ho KY, Chong CS, Muthiah M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: A meta-analysis and meta-regression with single arm analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(25): 3925-3939
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i25/3925.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3925