Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2021; 27(12): 1182-1193
Published online Mar 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i12.1182
Figure 1
Figure 1 Two-dimensional region of interest and volume of interest. A-C: T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) (A), arterial phase contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) (B), and R2* map showed liver metastasis (yellow line) (C) confirmed by histology in a 59-year-old woman with lung cancer; D: Two-dimensional region of interest was drawn on the section showing the maximal tumor dimension; E-G: T2WI (E), arterial phase contrast-enhanced T1WI (F), and R2* map showed a live hemangioma (yellow line) (G) in a 59-year-old woman; H: Volume of interest was placed covering the entire tumor volume on R2* map. 2D-ROI: Two-dimensional region of interest; VOI: Volume of interest.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Bland–Altman plots showing interobserver variability in two-dimensional region of interest and volume of interest measurements. A: Two-dimensional region of interest (ROI); B: Volume of interest. The differences between the two readers using the two different ROI positioning methods were small. 2D-ROI: Two-dimensional region of interest; VOI: Volume of interest.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the two positioning methods in differentiating between malignant group and benign group. Two-dimensional region of interest and volume of interest methods yielded similar results. 2D-ROI: Two-dimensional region of interest; VOI: Volume of interest; AUC: Area under the curve.