Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2010; 16(27): 3450-3456
Published online Jul 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i27.3450
Published online Jul 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i27.3450
Figure 1 Fixed effect model of odds ratio for survival during follow-up 1-year after treatment: Radiofrequency ablation vs hepatectomy.
RFA: Radiofrequency ablation.
Figure 2 Random effect model of odds ratio for survival of follow-up 3-year (A) and at the end of follow-up (B) after treatment: Radiofrequency ablation vs hepatectomy.
RFA: Radiofrequency ablation.
Figure 3 Random effect model of odds ratio for Recurrence of follow-up 1-year (A) and 3-year (B) and the end of follow-up (C) after treatment: Radiofrequency ablation vs hepatectomy.
RFA: Radiofrequency ablation.
Figure 4 Funnel plots.
A: 7 articles in the meta-analysis of survival during follow-up 1-year after treatment; B: 8 articles in the meta-analysis of survival during follow-up 3-years after treatment; C: 9 articles in the meta-analysis of survival up to the end of follow-up; D: 5 articles in the meta-analysis of recurrence during follow-up 1-year after treatment; E: 6 articles in the meta-analysis of recurrence during follow-up 3-years after treatment; F: 8 articles in the meta-analysis of recurrence up to the end of follow-up.
- Citation: Liu JG, Wang YJ, Du Z. Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(27): 3450-3456
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i27/3450.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i27.3450