Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2006; 12(46): 7542-7546
Published online Dec 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i46.7542
Figure 1
Figure 1 Endoscopic photographs of GEG. A: Retracted ulcer scar on greater curvature and incomplete closure of pylorus; B: A 0.3 cm × 0.4 cm ulcer on gastric notch had whitish base; C: A 3 cm × 4 cm ulcer on inferior wall of gastric body and lesser curvature side. Yellowish green base and tumid ulcer margin; D: A 4 cm × 5 cm giant ulcer on lesser curvature side of gastric antrum and gastric notch had thickened and irregular base. Anterior wall of duodenal bulb was involved; E: The deformed gastric antrum and a 2 cm × 3 cm giant ulcer on gastric antrum and posterior wall of pylorus. The ulcer had mignonette base and black spots. The ulcer margin presented indentation-shaped appearance. Ulcer tissue was rigid and prone to bleed; F: Rough esophageal mucous membrane, blurred vascular net, clear-cut esophageal Z line; G: Higher esophageal Z line.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Histologic photographs of GEG (H&E staining). A: Massive eosinophil cells and lymphocytes infiltrated (original magnification x 200); B: Same view as A, at different magnification (original magnification x 200); C: Massive eosinophil cells and lymphocytes infiltrated, especially surrounding the vessels. Intestinal metaplasia (original magnification x 100); D: Same view as C, at different magnification (original magnification x 200); E: Massive eosinophil cells and lymphocytes. Fibrous tissue proliferation, fabric scar, intestinal metaplasia and hyalinization (original magnification x 400); F: Massive eosinophil cells and lymphocytes. Arteriole, veinlets and lymph vessels abundantly proliferated. Lymphoid follicles (original magnification x 100); G: Same view as F, at different magnifications (original magnification x 400).