Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2015; 21(9): 2677-2682
Published online Mar 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i9.2677
Published online Mar 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i9.2677
Effect of longer battery life on small bowel capsule endoscopy
George Ou, Neal Shahidi, Cherry Galorport, Oliver Takach, Robert Enns, Division of Gastroenterology, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Pacific Gastroenterology Associates, Vancouver V6Z2K5, British Columbia, Canada
Terry Lee, Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, University of British Columbia, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver V6Z2K5, British Columbia, Canada
Author contributions: Ou G, Galorport C, Takach O and Enns R designed the research study; Ou G, Shahidi N, Galorport C and Takach O performed the data collection; Ou G and Lee T analyzed the data; Ou G and Enns R drafted the manuscript; all authors contributed to the critical revision and final approval of the manuscript.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Robert Enns, MD, FRCPC, Division of Gastroenterology, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Pacific Gastroenterology Associates, Suite 770 - 1190 Hornby Street, Vancouver V6Z2K5, British Columbia, Canada. rob.enns@ubc.ca
Telephone: +1-604-688-6332-222 Fax: +1-604-689-2004
Received: August 16, 2014
Peer-review started: August 16, 2014
First decision: September 15, 2014
Revised: September 25, 2014
Accepted: October 21, 2014
Article in press: October 21, 2014
Published online: March 7, 2015
Processing time: 205 Days and 7.5 Hours
Peer-review started: August 16, 2014
First decision: September 15, 2014
Revised: September 25, 2014
Accepted: October 21, 2014
Article in press: October 21, 2014
Published online: March 7, 2015
Processing time: 205 Days and 7.5 Hours
Core Tip
Core tip: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to specifically examine the effect of battery life on capsule endoscopy completion rate (i.e., complete visualization of the entire small bowel). Capsule endoscopies performed using SB2U had longer recording time and a corresponding trend toward higher completion rate than the older-generation SB2. As the two systems are identical in dimensions, there was no difference in the transit times. There was no difference in the rates of positive findings. A randomized controlled trial would be necessary to confirm the diagnostic advantage of longer battery life in capsule endoscopy.